Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11CM00660
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/04/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This project is governed by the 2006 IBC which has as the ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition) as the compliant accessibility code. a. Please change all details and references from ADA to ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition). b. Please review all accessibility design details and change them to be in compliance with the ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition). c. An accessible compliant review for ADA Accessible Standards may be conducted upon an approved appeal to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. If so desired, please complete a building official appeal and submit for review and approval. A fee of $132.00 is required for processing. 2. Generic details are not acceptable. Sheet nos. ADA1.0 and ADA 1.1 are mostly code copied details that that no relevance to the actual design of the accessibility elements of this project. Please delete all details not relevant to this project. a. Please provide large scale details of the accessible parking shown on sheet C2.0 and provide all accessible dimensions, slopes, signage, markings, symbols, ramps and access to the accessible routes in compliance with the ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition). c. Please note that detectable warning strips are not required for accessible parking aisles unless they are a part of a marked crossing. Please delete detectable warning strips shown at the aisle ramp. 3. SHEET A8.1 1. Generic details are not acceptable. Please delete all code copied details shown on sheets ADA 1.0 and A1.1 and show all accessible dimensions, accessories and requirements on the actual design toilet floor plan and elevations. SHEETS ADA1.0 AND 1.1 2. Please delete all details shown on these two sheets that are not relative to the design of this project. 3. Detail 12/ADA1.1: As per COT DOT standards, the bottom of the main sign is to be 7' a.f.g. 4. Please provide one large scale detail of the accessible parking layout with all requirements shown on this one detail. Three details are not necessary. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/09/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/16/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/17/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/23/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes or cleanouts g. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2011 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/21/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |