Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM00616
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Notes on cover sheet and A1.02G indicate using 1/3 diagonal distances for exiting. This is only correct for the sprinklered part of the building. Please adjust notes and diagrams to indicate 1/2 diagonals for unsprinklered parts of the building. Please add notes indicating fire pump room will meet all requirements for fire pump rooms from 2006 IFC and NFPA 20. These include floor drain, fire sprinklers, sufficient heat, electrical requirements, etc. Dumpsters (if inside) must be in sprinklered portions of the building. |
| 03/07/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. COT minimum font size for all drawings is 3/32". There are several architectural and all the structural that are not in compliance with this requirement. Please revise all non compliant sheets and resubmit. 2. For all floor plans, please show location of Accessible Parking signs. 3. Please provide approved site plan. SHEET A1.02G 4. The Code Summary shows that the governing accessibility code is the Fair Housing Act and ADA. The City of Tucson has adopted the 2006 IBC and its governing accessibility requirements are Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition). If an ADA Accessibility Standards review is desired, please file an appeal to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. a. If an ADAAS review is not requested, please change and note all accessibility references to ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition). 5. At the OCCUPANT LOAD schedule please provide the total number of occupants and/or change the A1.24 reference to A1.25. SHEET A1.04 6. Please provide a reference note to the preferred accessibility code to be used for this project. SHEET A1.25 7. At gate 107, Stair 5, please provide a landing on the stair side for compliance with 2006 IBC, Section 1008.1.5. a. Any gate hardware to be panic hardware. 8. Please show the diagonal separation for levels 1 through 6 without sprinklers. 9. At the 2nd Floor Egress Plan, please relocate the 3rd and 4th elevation markers to the 3rd- 5th Floor Egress Plan. 10. The code analysis calls for 12 accessible parking spaces to be provide. There are only 8 shown on this sheet. Some are missing. Please show or explain where the additional accessible spaces are to be located. 11. Please indicate the location of all the accessible parking signage. 12. Please provide total occupant load. SHEET A4.41 13. Ditto comment 7 above. 14. Provide detectable warning strips at either end of the marked crossing at the East entrance as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406.12 and/or 406.14. SHEET A6.21 15. Ditto comment 7 above. SHEET A7.22 16. For detail nos. HS1 and HS2, the bottom of the main sign is to be 7' a.f.f. as per COT DOT sign mounting standards. 17. Need Special Inspection Certifications. T11CM00616 THE DISTRICT PARKING GARAGE STRUCTURAL REVIEW 18. ALL SHEETS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE ALL LETTERING AS REQUIRED. 19. SHEET GS0-2; DETAIL 16: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION. 20. SHEET GS0-3; DETAIL 13: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE IN THE OPENING/REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE. 21. SHEETS GS1-1, GS1-2A, AND GS1-2B; PLAN: TO THE RIGHT OF GRID LINE 10, VERBIAGE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS IS COVERED BY A TEMPORARY SHORING WALL. MOVE THE VERBIAGE SO IT IS LEGIBLE. 22. SHEETS GS1-2A AND GS1-2B; PLAN: SEVERAL STRIP FOOTINGS ALONG GRID C BETWEEN GRIDS 4 AND 7 HAVE NO "BOF" REFERENCE NUMBER. VERIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. 23. SHEET GS1-3B; PLAN: TO THE LEFT OF GRID 8.8 AND ABOVE GRID A.3, VERBIAGE FOR A BEAM "CRB" IS COVERED BY A WALL. MOVE THE VERBIAGE SO IT IS LEGIBLE. 24. GENERAL CALCULATIONS: WITHOUT PROVIDING EVERY CALCULATION SHEET FOR EVERY STRUCTURAL MEMBER, PROVIDE SUMMARY SHEETS IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING ALL FOUNDATION, COLUMN, BEAM, WALL, SHEAR WALL, AND SLAB SIZES AND REINFORCING. 25. GENERAL: TYPICAL SECTIONS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE PLANS FOR THE VARIOUS SLAB THICKNESSES. WHERE ARE THESE THICKNESSES CALLED OUT? 26. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/14/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the purpose of the 6" RPZ located in the Riser/Pump Room; the civil drawing show a 6" RPZ located due west of the parking garage, next to the new water meter. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 2. Clarify the nature of the "funnel drain" located in the floor of each ventilation shaft, as noted on sheet P-2.0; it is not included in the project specifications. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 3. Finish dimensioning the domestic cold water piping shown on sheet P-2.2. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 4. Clarify the term, "non-diversified", used on sheet P-2.2 to describe the water fixture units for the three proposed buildings. Since the fixture unit vs. demand curves developed by Hunter already include diversity, provide an explanation of the pipe-sizing method that will be used. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2006. 5. Sheet P-2.1 shows two storm water manifolds. Explain how these assemblies comply with the requirements of Sections 1101.5, 1101.6, and 1102.7, IPC 2006. 6. Clarify the size-difference for the primary and secondary area drains on the west end of the 6th floor. 7. Specify the minimum slope for the horizontal rainwater conductors. Reference: Section 1106.3 and Table 1106.3, IPC 2006. |
| 03/14/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | A permanently legible imprint of the registrant's seal and signature, along with the date the documents were sealed, shall appear on each sheet of drawings. In addition, a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. |
| 03/14/2011 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No sewer-connected fixtures. |
| 03/14/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/17/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 550 N 5th Av Six Floor Parking Garage T11CM00616 The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. Provide fault current analysis beginning at the service and at each panel. 2. Provide a specification sheet for the Fire Pump, Jockey Pump, and the controllers. 3. Indicate on Sheet E2.2 , Fire Pump installation is to comply with NEC 2005 - 695 and NFPA-20. 4. Verify overcurrent selection for Fire Pump is per 2005 NEC-695.B.1. 5. Indicate on sheet E2.2, Fire Pump Disconnect Means to be marked per 695.4.B.3. 6. Sheet E2.3, feeders indicated under the panels show only the phase feeders, these must include the neutrals, 7. Sheet 2.17, size the conductors feeding the Fire Pump and indicate on plan. 8. Provide 2006 IECC Budget Lighting Calculations for Parking Garage. 9. Provide City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting( Ord. 10035) calculations showing compliance, can be found on the City's Web Page. Ray T Majuta, Elect Plan Ck PDSD, City of Tucson, 3/20/11, Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/23/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The development plan or final plat for the District project have not been approved. While it appears that the building plans match the unapproved version of the DP Zoning will wait until the DP is approved. Once the DP and FP have been approved and the commercial plans reviewers have also approved the building plans zoning will approve the building plans as well. A copy of the approved DP must be included with the next submittal of the garage plans |
| 03/28/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/28/2011, Development Package and Final Plat have not been approved yet. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |