Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM00463
Parcel: 10604073A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T11CM00463
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/14/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Architect needs to sign seal.

Shade canopies must be set back from property lines. If canopies are not set back from other buildings area must be calculated per IFC Section 2404.1.
02/15/2011 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Evan Eglin, Architect DATE: February 16, 2011
7391 E. Tanque Verde Road
Tucson, Arizona 85705
Subject: Kids Forever Day Care, 216 E. Prince Road
Site plan T11CM00000463 (First Review)
T13S, R13E, Section 25

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
4. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
6. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
10. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
11. Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
12. Show Site plan number (T11CM00463) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
13. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice.
14. A floodplain use permit may be required.
15. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".

Hydrology Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the HR.
2. There is a significant amount of stormwater (400 cfs) located on Prince Rd. It appears that the two buildings are connected by a shade structure and is considered one building. A HR is required to define the floodplain limits to determine if the building is in a floodplain, therefore a floodplain use permit for substantial improvement may be required.
3. A Hydrology report is required for developments which are not subject to detention requirements, nor which require extensive structural improvements for handling drainage; but which are impacted by flows from significant watercourse and/or affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more….. per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2
4. The content and format of the Hydrology report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the Hydrology report.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/216 E. Prince Rd. Ste 01 Site
02/15/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Kids Forever Daycare - Entry Addition
T11CM00463
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2011

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1) This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). This project has been reviewed for full code compliance for the area of expansion only due to a building expansion less than 25%.

2) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 The scale shown on the drawing appears to be incorrect. The Parking Area Access Lanes (PAAL's) dimensioned at 24'-0" scale at 35'-0".

3) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a legal description on the plan.

4) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide lot dimensions and bearings for all lot lines on the plan.

5) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the following information for all structures, buildings and shade structures, on the plan; size, height, overhangs.

6) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Based on the most current aerial photos there appears to be some type of structure located between Building 1 & 2 that is not shown on this plan. Show this structure on the plan and provide documentation that it was permitted.

7) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Based on the most current aerial photos there appears to be some type of shade structure located between Building 1 & 3 that is not shown on this plan. Show this structure on the plan and provide documentation that it was permitted.

8) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Based on the most current aerial photos there appears to be some type of patio cover along the east side of Building 2 that is not shown on this plan. Show this structure on the plan and provide documentation that it was permitted.
9)
10) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Provide both the existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan.

11) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide a width dimension for the entrance PAAL off of Prince Road.

12) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a PAAL width dimension from the striped area with the "P.P." to the parking shown to the north.

13) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Provide the existing zoning of the adjacent parcels, including those across the street.

14) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan. This use should be listed as "DAY CARE "31", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.13.5"

15) D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a Floor Area Ration (FAR) calculation on the plan. This calculation should include the allowed and proposed FAR.

16) D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle parking calculation is not correct. The calculation shows 26 spaces provided but there are only 24 shown on the plan, please clarify.

17) D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Based on the last approved site plan found in the COT Records Section there are four (4) Class 2 bicycle parking spaces shown on the plan. That said based on LUC Section 3.3.3.5 a minimum of two (2) Class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. Show the proposed location for the Class 2 Bicycle parking and provide a detail that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09.5.0 and includes materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. For your information a single inverted "U" supports two (2) bicycles.

18) Adjacent to "PROJECT DATA" there is a statement "(EXISTING NON-CONFORMING SITE)". Provide a copy of the Zoning Administrator's non-conforming letter or remove this statement from the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\2011\t11cm00463

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan.
02/24/2011 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
03/02/2011 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Passed
03/03/2011 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Passed
03/11/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Section R4-30-304 D of the Arizona Administrative Code states that a registrant shall sign, date, and seal professional documents that are to be submitted to any regulatory or review body.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the location and size of the water meter
b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants
c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned)
d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer
e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer
f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts
g. the first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
03/14/2011 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. The most Northerly existing accessible parking space aisle has been modified. Please insure that the aisle is a minimum of 5' wide for the entire length of the accessible parking space.
2. The most Southerly accessible parking space is a new parking space and subject to full code compliance.
a. The parking aisle may adjoin an accessible route, not be part of the accessible route, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 502.4.1. Please provide a separate aisle from the accessible route.
b. One of the two accessible parking spaces must be "Van Accessible" with an aisle width of 5' and a space width of 11' or aisle 8' and van parking space 8', ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 502.2
3. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking spaces showing the following:
a. Grade slopes of parking spaces and of the accessible route as per section 403.3 and 502.5.
b. Properly sized aisle
c. Dimensions
d. Signage and location, provide a large scale detail and show "Van Accessible" signage
e. Show how access is achieved to the accessible route.
4. The accessibility for the gate in front of building 3 has been removed and the gate is now exiting directly out into the PAAL. Please reinstate the accessible entrance as before.
5. Please verify with Zoning requirements the separation of the accessible pedestrian way from the vehicle paving for all pedestrian ways modified or new.
END OF REVIEW

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/21/2011 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/21/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed