Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM00375
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1)Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. A. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030. B. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) C. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. D. The density required of the water supply. 2) The "K" drawings are marked "Preliminary - not for construction" 3) Per 2006 IFC and IBC (section 907), A occupancies with an occupant load exceeding 300 require fire alarm system. Please include note indicating deferrred submittal for alarms. |
| 02/07/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need waste water 5th floor credit evaluation may need 3rd floor wastewater type III capacity review |
| 02/08/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a waste connection for the proposed clothes washer. Reference: Sections 304.0 and 310.4, UPC 2006. 2. Show how the water heater and clothes dryer will be provided with combustion air. Reference: Section 507.1.1, UPC 2006. 3. Clarify the installation of water heater WH-1 with regard to maintenance access, clearance from combustibles (e.g. at the top of the water heater), and the height of the flue. Reference: Section 310.4, 510.5.2.1, and 510.3.4, UPC 2006. 4. Clarify how the indirect waste piping from the north prep sink, K-2, in room 108 complies with the requirements of Section 803.0, UPC 2006 (e.g. each drain to extend separately to the indirect waste receptor; drains exceeding 5'-0" in length shall be trapped). 5. Provide a vent for the floor sink (P-7) in room 101. Reference: Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 2006. 6. Revise the island venting shown on the waste and vent diagram (sheet P8.1) to the arrangement shown in detail 2/P9.1. Reference: Section 909.0, UPC 2006. 7. Revise the vent for sink K-1 located in room 101 so that the opening for the vent is not below the weir of the fixture trap. Reference: Section 1002.4, UPC 2006. |
| 02/08/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/09/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide clarification of detail T7/S1.2 which provides support for suspended equipment weighing no more than 400 pounds as compared to keynote #11 on sheet S3.1 which references detail T7/S1.2 for the support of hood KH-1 which weighs 700 pounds. In addition, does the hood total weight include the weight of a person working "on or in the hood" as required by Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the walk-in freezer and the walk-in cooler. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006. 3. Revise the ventilation calculations to clarify the space descriptions and coordinate with the architectural plans. Include ventilation for the kitchen. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Hood KH-1 is serving heavy-duty cooking appliances; an un-listed hood for this use requires an exhaust flow rate of 400 CFM per foot of hood length. Provide listing information for the listed Type I hood that was used as the basis for design and only required approximately 275 CFM per foot of hood length. Reference: Sections 507.1 and 507.13.2, IMC 2006. 5. Clarify the hood over the rice cookers: on sheet M1.1 it is called a "Class II" hood (Type II?); on sheet K-1.0 is called a Type I hood. The minimum air flow rate for an un-listed wall-canopy Type II hood used for cooking purposes is 200 CFM per foot of length. Reference: Section 507.13.4, IMC 2006. |
| 02/14/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2011 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) REMOVE REFERENCE TO 2003 adaag ON PP A1.O. REFERENCE SHOULD BE TO ANSI 117.1 2) REMOVE OCCUPANCY REFERENCES TO "B" AND "M" OCCUPANCY TYPES PP A1.O. THE REFERENCE TO "A2" IS SUFFICIENT. 3) EXTERIOR DINING PATIO REQUIRES 2 MEANS OF EGRESS FOR PROVIDED OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR. 4) IBC SECTION 106.1.1....PLEASE PROVIDE CLEAR PLANS AND DETAILS FOR ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION SEPARATE FROM ARCHITECTURAL FINISH PLANS. PP A3.0 IS CONFUSING. IN SEVERAL PLACES WALLS ARE DENOTED AS "BRICK WALL, CLEAN AS NECESSARY" WHILE ALSO STATING "SKIM COAT ON EXISTING. NEW 5/8' GYP BOARD. SIMILARLY WALL TYPE 'M' STATES "FRP PANELS FULL HEIGHT ONE HOUR RATED WALL TYPE X FIRE RATED GYP BOARD"...PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THAT MEANS. 5) SIMILARLY PP A3.1. KEYNOTE 65 REFERENCES CONCRETE OR BRICK RAMPS AND YET IS USED AT SEVERAL PLACES THAT APPEAR TO BE SPACE HEATERS. 6) PP A3.2 IS ACCEPTABLE FOR WALL TYPE DISTINCTIONS. PLEASE REMOVE THE CONFLICTING INFORMAITON FROM THE PREVIOUS 2 PAGES AND PROVIDE CUT REFERENCES TO DETAIL PAGES. 7) CUT REFERENCES FOR DETAILS TO SOFFITS ARE MISSING FROM REFLECTED CEILING PLAN OR OTHER FLOOR PLAN SHEETS. 8) PLEASE COORDINATE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PP A4.0 WITH THAT ON PP E1.0 OR REMOVE LIGHTING NOTATIONS FROM REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. PP A4.0 NOTATIONS FOR L-17 AT BAR AND L-10 AT WALK INS DO NOT MATCH ELECTRICAL PLANS. 9) PLEASE DIMENSION ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS FOR LAVATORIES, TOILETS, GRAB-BARS, ETC TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ANSI 117.1 OR PROVIDE CUT-SHEET REFERENCES ON ELEVATION AND FLOOR PLANS. 10) |
| 02/28/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sushi Garden T11CM00375 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 28, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. As there has been an expansion of building area provide a vehicle parking calculation that shows that the entire site meets the requirements of the LUC Section 3.3.4. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t11cm00375.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02/2011 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/02/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |