Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM00219
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | A corridor exists in the north west corner of the store. Per 2006 IBC, section 1017, corridor must be 1 hour rated. |
| 02/02/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Circled keynotes and two elevation call-outs on sheet P102 refer to details on sheet P502; provide sheet P502. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. The plumbing riser diagram (A10 on sheet P501) refers to further details on sheet P2.2; provide sheet P2.2. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. The water pressure analysis on sheet P102 calls for the contractor to select and install a water pressure booster system. This constitutes the practice of engineering and requires plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. If the design for a booster system is not to be included with this package, show where the booster system is to be located and request a deferred submittal for the design. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304 and Section 103.2.2, UPC 2006. 4. Clarify the termination of the primary roof drains; detail H1/P510 is called out on sheet P104 but detail N1/P510 implies a connection to a site storm drain. (Note: Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain that, in turn, terminates in an area that is not capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage.) Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures (e.g. janitor's sink, 1- and 3-compartment sinks, and lavatories). All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, UPC, etc) Reference: Sections 301.1.1 and 401.1, UPC 2006. 6. Several of the specified fixtures (the Crane water closets and the Manitowoc ice makers) require a minimum pressure greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise the water pressure calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 7. Show the slope of the building sewer on the drawing (C150?). The slope of the building sewer shall be at least ΒΌ" per foot unless it is shown to be impractical due to the depth of the public sewer or structural conditions. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 718.1, UPC 2006. 8. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 719.1, UPC 2006. |
| 02/02/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. COVER SHEET: PER THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS, ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 2. COVER SHEET; SHEET INDEX: STRUCTURAL LISTS A SHEET S530. PROVIDE THAT SHEET IN THE SET. 3. COVER SHEET; SHEET INDEX: ARCHITECTURAL LISTS A SHEET A140. PROVIDE THAT SHEET IN THE SET. 4. COVER SHEET; SHEET INDEX: SHEET A621 IS A SHEET IN THIS SET, BUT NOT LISTED IN THE INDEX. PROVIDE. 5. COVER SHEET; SHEET INDEX: SHEET XC302 IS A SHEET IN THIS SET, BUT NOT LISTED IN THE INDEX. PROVIDE. 6. COVER SHEET; SHEET INDEX: SHEET XC311 IS A SHEET IN THIS SET, BUT NOT LISTED IN THE INDEX. PROVIDE. 7. COVER SHEET; SHEET INDEX: SHEET XC501 IS A SHEET IN THIS SET, BUT NOT LISTED IN THE INDEX. PROVIDE. 8. SHEETS XC301/XC302 (DETAIL F14); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (PAGE vii): THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INDICATES FOUNDATIONS AT THE CANOPY SHOULD BEAR AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 7' BELOW FINISH GRADE. THE DETAIL INDICATES 5'-0". CLARIFY. 9. SHEET A101; FLOOR PLAN: ELEVATIONS IN THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM ARE DESIGNATED AS D10-A211, D3-A211, D13-A211, D17-A211, AND D6-A211. THERE ARE NO "D" DETAILS ON THAT SHEET. REVISE. 10. SHEET A101; FLOOR PLAN: A DETAIL NEAR THE RESTROOMS IS DESIGNATED AS E11-A530. THERE IS NO DETAIL E11 ON THAT SHEET. REVISE. 11. SHEET A110 (PARTITION TYPES); SHEET A550 (DETAIL A9): THE DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE TOP OF THE PARTITION TYPES (A9-A550) SHOWS THE WALL EXTENDING TO THE STEEL DECK, WHILE THE DETAILS ON A550 SHOW THE WALL STOPPING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF JOISTS. VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH THE STRUCTURAL. 12. SHEET A110; PARTITION TYPE 7: THE DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL (A9-A550) IS INCORRECT. REVISE. 13. SHEET A401; SECTION A14: THE BOXED NOTE REFERENCES SHEET A1.4. REVISE. 14. SHEET S101; FOUNDATION PLAN: IS THE SECTION CUT R8-S502 AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING CORRECT? SECTION R8-S502 IS A SECTION AT THE ENTRY. VERIFY. 15. SHEET S502 (SECTION A1); SHEET C500 (DETAIL F1): THE GUARDRAIL HEIGHT REQUIREMENT IS 42" PER THE IBC SECTION 1013.2 (AS INDICATED ON SECTION A1-S502). REVISE DETAIL F1-C500. 16. GENERAL: GUARDRAIL OPENINGS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1013.3. INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 17. GENERAL: IT APPEARS THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THOSE SHEETS LISTED IN THE DIRECTORY AND ACTUAL SHEETS IN THE SET. REVIEW AND VERIFY ALL SHEETS. 18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/02/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/03/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Coordinate the component descriptions as shown on the Envelope Compliance Certificate with the components shown on the drawing. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Condensate drains may not terminate in an area that is not capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage (i.e. condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain that, in turn, terminates in an area that is not capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage). Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 02/04/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | A floodplain use permit and an elevation certificate are required for this project. If the DR can demonstrate that the project (bldg. /canopy) can be removed or is not affected by the regulated flow of 142 cfs, then the FUP and El. Cert. will not be required. Engineering will then approve the bldg. and the canopy. 02-04-2011. Paul Machado. |
| 02/07/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/14/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TYPE III CAPACITY RESPONCE LETTER FROM PCRWRD 3RD FLOOR- CHAD 740-6547 NEED WASTEWATER IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR- TOM TOMCHAK 443-6600 NEED WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR DEMO OF BUILDING- LIZ 740-6602 |
| 02/16/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/16/2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/24/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |