Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T11CM00100
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T11CM00100 201 N. 4th Ave. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 01/21/11 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 The indicated existing building encroaching into the right of way will require approval from the real estate division of the city of tucson, possibly thru a TRE (temporary revocable easement), purchase of the right of way or redesign of the project.. Provide written approval from the real estate division. Contact Jim Rossi. The indicated existing structure is considered a historic building and must be reviewed and approved by Frank Podgorski for the HPZ division of the City of Tucson prior to and demolition of existing structures. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide dimensioned setback distances from all property lines to the proposed structure. The required (front) street perimeter yard setback Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5 is 20' or 11/2 times the wall height. The required side street setback per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5 for both 9th St. and Stevens Ave. is 10'. A DDO variance may be required to reduce the required setback. Contact Adam Smith regarding the Infill Incentive District which may allow reduced setbacks and other items which may help in completing this project. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 This project is proposing zero parking spaces being provided with a total of 62 parking spaces required. A Board of Adjustment (BOA) variance will be required to be completed and approved for the elimination of all required parking. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Provide the sight visibility triangle for the PAAL accessing Stevens Ave. There appears to be structures within the sight visibility triangles. See engineering comments. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 Clarify the proposed use: If two principal uses are to be provided, Bar and Food Services, Clearly indicate what square footage is bar and what square footage is Food Services. List the proposed use or uses as follows: "Food Services "33" subject to: Sec.3.4.5.6.C" and "Alcoholic Beverage Service "33" subject to: Sec. 3.4.5.19.C" If two principal uses are being proposed a change to vehicle parking requirements will be required. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 The number and of bicycle parking spaces is indicated incorrectly. Two class one and two class two spaces are required. Clearly indicate the location of the class one bicycle parking spaces along with a detail of the type of locker and dimensioned layout. 7. Per the new LUC a loading zone is not required. If the loading zone shown is to remain, it would require a TRE from real estate. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T11CM00100.doc |
| 01/18/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 25, 2012 SUBJECT: 201 N 4th Ave- Site Plan 2nd Engineering Review TO: John Campisano LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec12 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T11CM00100 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan (T11CM00100) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Restated: DS Sec.2-02: Provide site plan that meets all minimum requirements within Development Standards Section 2-02 (Site Plan Content). It is acknowledge that an MDR application has been submitted for the IID however prior to approval of the site plan the application must be approved and all conditions of approval must be listed on the site plan as a General Note. 2) Restated: Revise the site plan to verify conformance with the future Modern Streetcar Project and public roadway improvement plans that will affect the public right-of-way of Stevens Ave. Refer to R. Bruce Woodruff A.I.A., LEED AP, COTGSD AE Project Manager at 520-837-6310 or bruce.woodruff@tucsonaz.gov for any questions regarding the Modern Streetcar Project. Provide written approval for conformance. 3) Completed. 4) Completed. 5) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.6: Provide approval from TDOT and COT Real Property Department for all existing overhangs that are currently located within the public right-of-way. Verify conformance with all Historic District requirements and any issues with the future Modern Streetcar Project improvement plans. The indicated existing structure is considered a historic building and must be reviewed and approved by Frank Podgorski from the HPZ division of the City of Tucson prior to the demolition of existing structures. 6) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Any proposed offsite parking (either on street parking or leased area parking) must satisfy the Zoning Land Use Code requirements and will require prior written approval before final site plan approval. It is acknowledge that an MDR application has been submitted for the IID however prior to approval of the site plan the application must be approved and all conditions of approval must be listed on the site plan as a General Note. 7) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide a detail for the proposed new asphalt driveway. Verify the proposed driveway meets the minimum surfacing requirements per the LUC 3.3.7.3. It is acknowledge that an MDR application has been submitted for the IID however prior to approval of the site plan the application must be approved and all conditions of approval must be listed on the site plan as a General Note. 8) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to provide all dimensions for the proposed sight visibility triangles. Verify the dimensions meet the requirements within DS Sec.3-01.5.1. PAALs to Arterial MS&R Streets have a Near side dimension of 20'x345' and a Far side dimension of 20'x125', revise. Per the site plan there are structures located within the SVT areas, a DSMR will be required to modify the standard to allow the existing structures within the SVT areas. 9) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to show all minimum dimensions for the proposed PAAL. It is acknowledge that an MDR application has been submitted for the IID however prior to approval of the site plan the application must be approved and all conditions of approval must be listed on the site plan as a General Note. 10) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the right-of-way for all public roads. It is acknowledge that an MDR application has been submitted for the IID however prior to approval of the site plan the application must be approved and all conditions of approval must be listed on the site plan as a General Note. Be advised that TDOT has a Special Plan for the future widening of Stevens Blvd since it is classified as an Arterial Road per the MS&R Street Maps. 11) Acknowledged. 12) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to provide a detail for the proposed refuse container to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Verify maneuverability, construction details, etc. Refuse vehicle can not back out into traffic and across a pedestrian sidewalk for safety issues. Provide Environmental Services approval for all refuse requirements. 13) Acknowledged. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929 Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 01/25/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Contact Adam Smith for information regarding the Infill Incentive District which may help with subsequent reviews. 1. The existing structure is considered a historic building and must be reviewed and approved by Frank Podgorski for Historic Preservation prior to demolition of existing structures. 2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. 3. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Obtain permission for use of ROW. 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 6. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. I. Identify all screening elements on the site & landscape plans. 7. DS 10-03.0 COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. Provide Rainwater Harvesting Plan. 8. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 9. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 10. If necessary include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 11. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/25/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/02/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts g. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |