Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11CM00100
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/20/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T11CM00100 201 N. 4th Ave. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 01/21/11 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2..1.A.2 Provide the legal description of the property on the site plan. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide the bearings of all property lines. The indicated existing building encroaching into the right of way will require approval from the real estate division of the city of tucson, possibly thru a TRE (temporary revocable easement), purchase of the right of way or redesign of the project.. Provide written approval from the real estate division. Contact Jim Rossi. The indicated existing structure is considered a historic building and must be reviewed and approved by Frank Podgorski for the HPZ division of the City of Tucson priior to and demolition of existing structures. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide dimensioned setback distances from all property lines to the proposed structure. The required (front) street perimeter yard setback Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5 is 20' or 11/2 times the wall height. The required side street setback per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5 for both 9th St. and Stevens Ave. is 10'. A DDO variance may be required to reduce the required setback. Contact Adam Smith regarding the Infill Incentive District which may allow reduced setbacks and other items which may help in completing this project. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 This project is proposing zero parking spaces being provided with a total of 62 parking spaces required. A Board of Adjustment (BOA) variance will be required to be completed and approved for the elimination of all required parking. The indiacted proposed leased parking will not be allowed because this use requires parking be located within the same block (SB). See LUC Sec. 3.3.7.1 5. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Provide the sight visibility triangle for the PAAL accessing Stevens Ave. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 Clarify the proposed use: If two principal uses are to be provided, Bar and Food Services, Clearly indicate what square footage is bar and what square footage is Food Services. List the proposed use or uses as follows: "Food Services "33" subject to: Sec.3.4.5.6.C" and "Alcoholic Beverage Service "33" subject to: Sec. 3.4.5.19.C" If two principal uses are being proposed a change to vehicle parking requirements will be required. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 Clearly indicate maneuvering in and out ot the proposed refuse container location. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The access aisle is 5' and the length of the bicycle space is 6' not as indicated on the site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T11CM00100.doc |
| 01/24/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Contact Adam Smith for information regarding the Infill Incentive District which may help with subsequent reviews. 1. The existing structure is considered a historic building and must be reviewed and approved by Frank Podgorski for Historic Preservation prior to demolition of existing structures. 2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. 3. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Obtain permission for use of ROW. 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 6. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. I. Identify all screening elements on the site & landscape plans. 7. DS 10-03.0 COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. Provide Rainwater Harvesting Plan. 8. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 9. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 10. If necessary include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 11. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/26/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 02/01/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 1, 2011 SUBJECT: 201 N 4th Ave- Site Plan Engineering Review TO: John Campisano LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec12 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T11CM00100 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan (T11CM00100) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02: Provide site plan that meets all minimum requirements within Development Standards Section 2-02 (Site Plan Content). The site plan needs to show conformance with all Development Standards that are applicable to this project. Specifically DS Sec.2-02, 2-08, 3-01, 3-05 and 6-01. 2) Revise the site plan to verify conformance with the future Modern Streetcar Project and public roadway improvement plans that will affect the public right-of-way of Stevens Ave. Refer to R. Bruce Woodruff A.I.A., LEED AP, COTGSD AE Project Manager at 520-837-6310 or bruce.woodruff@tucsonaz.gov for any questions regarding the Modern Streetcar Project. 3) Revise the site plan to provide correct references to the PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvements for all referenced details, i.e. Std Detail #200 for all proposed sidewalks, etc. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Revise the site plan to provide the lot dimensions and bearing for the property boundaries depicted on the site plan. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.6: Provide approval from TDOT and COT Real Property Department for all existing overhangs that are currently located within the public right-of-way. Verify conformance with all Historic District requirements and any issues with the future Modern Streetcar Project improvement plans. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Any proposed offsite parking (either on street parking or leased area parking) must satisfy the Zoning Land Use Code requirements and will require prior written approval before final site plan approval. Revise the Aerial Map to remove the gray shading so that both parcels are visible on the drawing. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide a detail for the proposed new asphalt driveway. Verify the proposed driveway meets the minimum surfacing requirements per the LUC 3.3.7.3. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to provide all dimensions for the proposed sight visibility triangles. Verify the dimensions meet the requirements within DS Sec.3-01.5.1. Also provide SVT's for all existing and proposed PAAL access points. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to show all minimum dimensions for the proposed PAAL. Specifically driveways require a minimum 12-foot separation from adjacent curb cuts and the PAAL radii is required to be 18-feet per the Tucson Access Management Guidelines. Verify conformance with all Historic District requirements and any issues with the future Modern Streetcar Project improvement plans. 10) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the right-of-way for all public roads. Label all roads as "Public." 11) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.21: Revise the site plan to label the dimensions from street monument lines to the existing curb, property line, sidewalk widths, and utility lines. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to provide a detail for the proposed refuse container to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Verify maneuverability, construction details, etc. Refuse vehicle can not back out into traffic and across a pedestrian sidewalk for safety issues. Provide Environmental Services approval for all refuse requirements. 13) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the site plan and/or provide a separate detail to clearly show the minimum 2-foot setback from the property boundary to the proposed limits of grading and/or any proposed improvements, specifically the proposed wall along the north property line. Or provide a detail that clearly shows the construction of the wall entirely onsite (L-shaped footer). GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929 Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 02/03/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts g. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/10/2012 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |