Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T11BU01310
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Parking Lot Expansion @ St. Mary's Road and I-10 T11BU01310 Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2011 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not approve the grading plan until the site plan has been approved. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t11bu01310 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Grading plan and a copy of the approved site plan |
| 10/20/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise plans as necessary to correspond with any site plans revisions. 2) Revise the plans and notes to include water harvesting depressions for the interior tree planters. |
| 10/31/2011 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: October 31, 2011 TO: John Holley, P.E., WLB SUBJECT: St Mary's / I-10 Parking Lot Expansion Site/Grading Plan Engineering 1st submittal Review LOCATION: 116-19-3780 ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T11BU01310, T11CM03211 SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed the submittal package including drainage statement. The following comments are conditions of approval that must be addressed at next submittal. SITE/GRADING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) DS sec.10-02.2.3.2: Address the following items for the drainage statement: a) Correct parcel number on cover sheet, and add address to cover page. b) Correct Manning's value for concentration point 1.0 and associated calculations. For determining capacity of pavement areas, revise worksheet(s) for to reflect a roadway Manning's coefficient of .020 for the maximum value for asphalt when cars are present, per this section of the standards: DS Sec.10-02 page 8.06, Table 8.1. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Address the following site plan related items: a) Parcel shape does not appear to match the project boundary limits. In particular, the east corner area does not recorded parcel limits for 116-19-3780. Show 116-19-3780 parcel limits on sheet 1 of Site, Paving, Grading Plans. b) Add PAAL width dimensions to sheet 3 of the Striping and Signing Plan. c) Provide a note to the site plan stating compliance with the La Entrada PAD. d) State in response letter whether all utilities are shown. In particular, assure that all utility poles identified with project limits. e) Provide copy of agreement, TRE, or other documentation approved by City of Tucson Real Estate for this project as discussed in meeting 12OCT11. 3) DS Sec.11-01.9: Address the following grading and offsite improvements: a) On sheet 2, at northeast corner of project clarify end of curb location to assure connection to existing pavement. b) Add bleed pipes or Type 1 scupper at sidewalk crossing for water harvest areas; assure no ponding issues occur at this site. c) The proposed slope along the west project limits appears to lie within the parcel limits, however is beyond the project limits. This slope may be described in the agreement or also documented in a temporary or other slope easement. d) Along the north boundary there is a slope and grading proposed that exceeds the limits of the project boundary. Typically this shall be shown in the form of a slope easement. Otherwise, adjust proposed grading along this portion of the project as this slope appears to be adjustable and may be pulled within the project limits. Please call me for clarifications at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/02/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |