Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T11BU00063
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1 (DETAILS 1 AND 2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (BY R. SMOLINSKY): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE RETAINING WALL TOE SHOULD BE DOWN 6.3' (6'-4") BELOW THE EXISTING WASH DUE TO SCOURING, WHILE THE DETAILS INDICATE 6'-0". CLARIFY. |
| 02/11/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and floodplain Review, 02/11/2011 Sorrento Square Retaining Walls Grading Plan Comments: 1- It is not clear what sheets are submitted as a grading plan for review. Is Grading Plan No. T07BU01842 submitted for reference or as a grading plan for the proposed retaining wall? If it was submitted for review, it does not have enough wall construction information to review. The wall detail sheets do not appear to be part of the grading plan submittal. This Office recommends submitting two copies of one set of grading plan that has all the required grading plan information, all the sheets are numbered properly and all the construction information and details to build the proposed wall. 2- Show, on the plan, the location(s) of the wall (s) cross section details. 3- Show on the cross section details the adjacent wash and its floodplain, and verify that the walls footings will be below the wash scour depth, in accordance with the hydraulic analysis, where applicable. 4- Provide the proper title block that includes the project administrative address on the cover sheet, and the correct Grading Plan Case Number (i.e. T11BU00063) on every sheet. 5- Show and label the actual grading limits. Include the grading limits symbol in the legend. 6- Provide the actual cut and fill quantities. 7- Show clearly existing and proposed grades. 8- Disturbed area must be reseeded. 9- Provide the location of the basis of elevation. 10- Provide the tie to the basis of bearing. 11- Add the following general notes: a. The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Planning and Development Services Department Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work. b. Any proposed engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it. c. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department. d. CALL FOR SWPPP INSPECTION AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A PDSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/inspections. e. The project will be in compliance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading). f. A copy of the approved Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. g. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. h. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. i. See the associated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as a part of this grading permit. j. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. k. As-builts and letters of completion for the overall project are required. l. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications. m. The permitee shall notify the PDSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted. 12- The Grading Plan cannot be approved until the structural review is approved. 13- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |