Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T10PI00002
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. See redlines on the submitted drawings and address prior to resubmittal. During the next submittal please re-submit the roll of redlines for back checking purposes. |
| 01/28/2010 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2010 | Blanca Espino | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please include a detail letter of explanation with the next submittal indicating where and how revisions were made. Single word responses are unacceptable. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. In title block, add assigned I-Plan Number, I-2010-002 to all sheets. 3. Indicate assigned TDOT activity number T10PI00002 above title block. See redlines. 4. Sheet 1, General Note #22: "The PIA Inspector shall verify that the Saw-cut line is located within competent pavement. Adjustments to the plan shall be documented and As-built; a one foot minimum shall be provided." Correct note to read one foot instead of two feet. 5. Sheet 2, Roadway Plan View: Indicate the Stationing, Offset, Elevation, and Beginning point of pavement cut. See redlines. 6. Sheet 2, Detail E: Show the proposed information for Q, S, and V, as well as the proposed structural pavement. Existing pavement thickness and surface treatment shall be matched. 7. All symbols and lines shown on plan must be shown in Legend. 8. Indicate a cross section detail of PAAL entryway. See redlines for exact location of cross section. 9. Pedestrian areas/shoulders along side of strip paved streets should be a minimum of 8 feet wide, slope @ 2% and be separate to drainage ditches/channels. 10. Demonstrate how this proposed design will incorporate a continuous pedestrian circulation path across the entryway. 11. There is an existing east bound Sun Tran bus stop just passed the proposed entryway to Lincoln Park. Demonstrate how this proposed entryway may impact the existing bus stop location. Contact Bea Paulus of Sun Tran at 623-4301 for all bus stop questions. 12. See redlines for additional corrections. Once changes, modifications, and or corrections are made to the PIA plan resubmitted and reviewed, further comment may result. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6634 or Blanca.Espino@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide typical pavement section 2) Need roadway vertical profile |
| 02/26/2010 | RICHARD LEIGH | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS. |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Approved | |
| 02/26/2010 | RICHARD LEIGH | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS. |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | |
| 02/26/2010 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied |