Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T10CM03529
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Sheet ST1 Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements. Sheet E-2 There is an exit sign going into "sales support". Storage rooms cannot be used as exits. See IFC 1014. |
| 01/19/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Family Dollar Store T10CM03529 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 19, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the buildng plan until the site plan has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm03529.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 01/19/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CVR; DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. SUBMIT REQUEST TO LEERAY.HANLY@TUCSONAZ.GOV ON COMPANY LETTERHEAD, STATING THE ACTIVITY NUMBER, PROJECT ADDRESS, AND TYPE OF DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. 2. SHEET CVR; DRAWING INDEX: SHEET DV10-651-01 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SET. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S2 (FOUNDATION PLAN): THE COLUMNS AT GRIDS 3.1 AND 3.8 ARE SHOWN IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ON THESE TWO SHEETS. A1 INDICATES THE COLUMNS ARE FLUSH WITH THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE CMU WALL, WHILE S2 INDICATES THE COLUMNS ARE FLUSH WITH THE INSIDE FACE OF THE CMU WALL (SEE DETAIL 7/SD-1). CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: THE 3'-4" HIGH CMU KNEE WALL BETWEEN GRIDS 2.2 AND 3.1, AND GRIDS 3.8 AND 4.8, SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 5. SHEET A2; FRONT ELEVATION: AT THE ENTRY DOOR, THERE IS A LEADER LINE WITHOUT A NOTE. IS THIS A CANOPY SUPPORT COLUMN? VERIFY. 6. SHEET A2; CANOPY DETAIL: PROVIDE A DETAIL TO INDICATE HOW THIS CANOPY CONNECTS TO THE WALL. 7. SHEET A2; LEFT SIDE ELEVATION: PROVIDE A DETAIL TO INDICATE HOW THE 4'X6' PRE-MANUFACTURED METAL CANOPY CONNECTS TO THE WALL. 8. SHEET A2; DOWNSPOUT NOTE: A CIVIL ENGINEER HAS NOT DETERMINED THE DOWNSPOUT SPACING ON THIS SET OF DRAWINGS. PROVIDE. 9. SHEET A3 (DETAIL 3); SHEET SD-1 (DETAIL 5): REVISE DETAIL 3 TO MATCH DETAIL 5. 10. SHEET A5: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 3/32". REVISE SHEET. 11. SHEET S1; STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES (FOUNDATION): NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED IN THE DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 12. GENERAL: IS THIS TO BE PRE-FABRICATED METAL BUILDING? A NOTE ON SHEET A2 (NOTE 2 IN EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE) INDICATES "IF A METAL BUILDING IS USED". VERIFY. IF SOMETHING OTHER THAN A METAL BUILDING IS USED, PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THAT SYSTEM (NOT A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL), AND REVISE ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/21/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 01/25/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM03529, 3000 E Fairland Strv, TI Dollar Store ,New The electrical drawings have been denied for the following reasons, please note each and state what was done to address them. 1. The City of Tucson requires compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Code (ORD # 10135) requirement, this must be accomplished by providing a calculation showing compliance with it. Can be found on City Web page. Includes outdoor building fixtures and pole fixtures. 2. Cut sheets for all outdoor fixtures are required to be submitted. 3. Indicate on plans Electrical to comply with 2005 NEC and City of Tucson Amendments. 4. Sheet E-1 shows the service on the West side of the structure, Sheet E-2 shows the service on the East side. Bothe sheets to show service in the same location. 5. The service is shown as a new overhead service, the City of Tucson requires all new services to be underground . An appeal for a waiver would be required first , and requirements need to be met first in order to obtain one. 6. Provide a fault current analysis showing values at the service and panels. 7. Is the two section panel listed and approved as a feed thru ? 8.Provide 2006 IECC Budget Lighting Calculations for Interior, Com-Check ok. 9. Sheet E-3, located Circuit PP-27 in panel schedule not on power plan. 10. Sheet E-3,located circuits PP-30,32,34,and 58 on panel schedule not on plans. 11. The water heater shown on Sheet P-1 shows a 3KW load, the Panel schedule shows a 1.7KVA on a 20 amp breaker. Ray T Majuta, Elect Plan Review, PDSD, City fo Tucson, 1/26/11, Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/27/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a detail to show how the proposed water heater is to be supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 314.5, UPC 2006. 2. Revise the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories to a maximum delivery temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 3. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Provide additional cleanouts in drainage pipe for each aggregate horizontal change of direction exceeding 135 degrees. Reference: Section 707.5, UPC 2006. 5. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006 (i.e. a 4" drain requires at least a 3-1/2" cleanout). 6. Revise the slope of the horizontal drainage piping to comply with the requirements of Section 708.0, UPC 2006. |
| 02/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. (The insulation note on sheet A3 has different R-values for the roof than the submitted calculations.) Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006 |
| 02/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to show the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 02/02/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need PCRWRD review of location/method of connection to public sewer - drawings indicate a 4" HCS connection to a new manhole over an exsisting 8" public sewer need addressing review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |