Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T10CM03529
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2011 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/04/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Family Dollar Store T10CM03529 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. It appears some type of lot split is proposed. This lot split must be completed prior to approval of the site plan. Provide documents showing that this lot split has been processed through the City of Tucson's Planning and Development Services Department. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 It is unclear how this project has an address of 3000 E. Fairland Stravenue as it has no street frontage along Fairland. Once comment 2 above has been addressed a new address will be required. Zoning recommends that until comment 2 above has been addressed that an administrative address be acquired from Pima County addressing. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide building overall dimensions and a building height within the footprint of the building on the site plan. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 As 36th Street is a Major Street and Route the street perimeter yard setback is based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B. That said the required street perimeter yard is measured from the back of future curb. Show the future curb on the plan and provide a perimeter yard setback dimension from the building to the back of future curb. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed building will meet the street perimeter yard setback. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 It appears that the sidewalk along the east side of the proposed building is less than 6'-6". That said wheel stops will be required to prevent vehicles from encroaching into the minimum four (4) foot width for a sidewalk. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 On the "PARKING STALL" and "ADA PARKING STALL" detail shown the wheel stops and provided a location dimension based on D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a detail for the proposed bicycle parking. The detail shall include; materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Review D.S. 2-09 for the layout requirements. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show both the existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the site plan. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The legend, on sheet C-2, calls out "ADA/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS" denoted by a triangle and "BICYCLE ACCESS" denoted by a circle. It appears that the two symbols have been interchanged, please clarify. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-09.3.2 Pedestrian Sidewalks. The bicycle access through the development will be separate from pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle. That said it appears that the proposed bicycle access is using required pedestrian/accessible access for it access route. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a width dimension for all proposed sidewalks on the plan. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 The proposed monument sign, called out under construction note 27 appears to encroach into the proposed parking area access lane (PAAL). Per D.S. 3-05.2.2 a minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. Relocation the sign to meet the two (2) foot setback. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label 36th Street as an "MS&R ROUTE". 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable all easements must be shown graphically on the site plan together with recording docket and page reference. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing use on the plan. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 The proposed use must be listed as a use shown in the LUC. "COMMERCIAL" is not a use listed in the LUC. The proposed use for this project should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C" 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 There appears to be three (3) sets of gates proposed for the effuse container enclosure. It does not appear that a collection vehicle will be able to access the western most gates with out crossing over required parking spaces. Clearly show on the site plan how a collections vehicle will be able to access this area with out crossing over required parking. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 The provided bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales, Bicycle: Eight (8) percent - fifty (50) percent Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2. That said eight (8) percent of 40 = 3.2 or 3 bicycle parking space required.Per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A. Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. For your information a single inverted "U" bicycle rack can support two (2) bicycles. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 4 Adjacent to the bicycle parking calculaiton there is a "(T2)" please clarify what this stands for. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.A.5 Provide a loading space calculation that includes the number requried and provided. 22. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm03529 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 01/05/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Identify the 2006 IBC Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) as the governing building code for all accessibility requirements for this project. a. Delete all references to ADA. 2. Provide detectable warning strips 2' deep at both ends of the marked crossing. 3. Provide a large scale detail of the parking aisle ramps, the accessible parking spaces (the actual design not generic details) and parking signage. a. Show all dimensions, slopes, sign heights, detectable warning strips, marked crossing access to accessible route and any and all other accessibility requirements not listed. b. Show location of signage and include "Van Accessible" sign. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/11/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List http://www.adwr.state.az.us/AzDWR/Watermanagement/AMAs/documents/2010TAMA_apha_botanical_PLANTLIST.pdf 2. The following plants are not on the list: Rhus lancea (African sumac) Chitalpa (Chitalpa tashkentensis) Cotoneaster lacteus (Red Clusterberry ) Revise plant selection as necessary. 3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 4. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. 5. Vegetation with a height greater than thirty (30) inches cannot be located within the sight visibility triangle (SVT) required by Development Standard 3-01.0. Indicate existing and future SVT's on the landscape plan. 6. Revise note pertaining to dust control to read: All areas and the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. 7. DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 10-03.0 COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. Include plan with next submittal. 8. Storm water detention/retention basins not shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Plants located in the bottom one-third (1/3) of the detention/retention basin must be adaptable to periods of submersion. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. 9. Add the following notes to the landscape plan: DS 2-06.6.0 MAINTENANCE STANDARDS " Any plant material in areas of required landscaping that does not survive will be replaced with an equivalent size and species within thirty (30) days. " Plant material will be pruned as necessary to control size but not to disrupt the natural growth pattern or characteristic form of the plant except as necessary to achieve height clearance for visibility and pedestrian passage or to achieve a continuous opaque hedge if required. " Clipping and pruning of the plant material are required to allow maximum shading while preserving surveillance opportunities and preventing obstructive overhang into walks, curb areas, drives, and line of sight triangles. For general guidelines on height clearance of tree canopies, refer to Sec. 2-06.3.6.D, Sec. 2-06.3.6.E, Sec. 2-06.3.6.F, and Sec. 2-06.3.7.D. " All dead or removed plant material will be replaced with plant material acceptable under the requirements of the xeriscape landscaping regulations. Replacement material will be a minimum fifteen (15) gallon size for trees and five (5) gallon size for shrubs. " Regular landscape maintenance should ensure water efficiency and include, but not be limited to, pruning, mulching, weeding, and litter removal. 10. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 11. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/12/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 01/26/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Hannamans Holdings, LLC. DATE: January 27, 2011 3567 E Sunrise Drive, Ste. 219 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: Family Dollar Store, 3000 E. Fairland Sv. Site plan T10CM03529 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, to be a minimum of 3/32 inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving per DS 2-01. 3. Provide a Location Map (3" = 1 mile). 4. Revise all references to other municipal agencies to reference the City of Tucson, Pima Co. and/or Arizona Dept. to Transportation references. 5. Landscape/water harvesting basins cannot be located in the existing or future right-of-way. Provide documentation from the Tucson Dept. of Transportation accepting any basin located in the public right-of-way. 6. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. Is a lot split is proposed? If so, the lot split must be completed prior to approval of the site plan. Provide documentation showing that this lot split has been processed through the City of Tucson's Planning and Development Services Dept. Also provide the new address of the lot project is located on the plans and/or where the old address is referenced. 7. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. 8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 9. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. If pedestrian access via a sidewalk is required leading to the parking spaces next to the retention basin, then a security barrier is required for basins that exceed 2' in depth with slopes greater than 4:1 per section 3.6 of the City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. 10. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. The service vehicle approach to the refuse enclosures cannot encroach onto the parking spaces. Revise as required. 11. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 12. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Including intersection widening and existing right-of-way widths. 13. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 16. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 17. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 18. Show Site plan number (T10CM03529) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 19. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide a detail of the refuse enclosure on the plans. 20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 21. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 22. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice. 23. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 24. Submit a copy of the geotechnical report. 25. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 26. "A Grading plan and a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 2 sets of grading and SWPPP with text, upon completion and submittal of the grading plan. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the grading plans". Contact Paul P. Machado at (520) 837-4932 for more information. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The DR was reviewed for SP purposes only. Additional comments may be forth coming when a grading plan is submitted. 3. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR when the lot split has been approved. 4. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 5. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from the property lines. 6. Landscape/water harvesting basins cannot be located in the existing or future right-of-way. Provide documentation from the Tucson Dept. of Transportation accepting any basin located in the public right-of-way. 7. Detention/Retention: " Inlet/Outlet structural details (Weir design). " Cross-sections and dimension. " Dimension basin and provide spot elevations. Basins must be graded to drain to one spot. " Security barriers are required if ponding depth exceeds 2 feet, if slopes are greater than 4:1 and/or if pedestrian access is adjacent to basin. " Water surface elevations. " Peak discharge at basin's outlet. 8. Provide details or manufactures specifications of all surface and subsurface drainage devices in the DR. 9. Provide percolation test results for the retention basin. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3000 E. Fairland Sv. Site |
| 12/30/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/07/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |