Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM03518
Parcel: 11204409A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T10CM03518
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/15/2011 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Approved
02/15/2011 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
02/15/2011 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied The follwing comments were not addressed from previous review:

1. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List http://www.adwr.state.az.us/AzDWR/Watermanagement/AMAs/documents/2010TAMA_apha_botanical_PLANTLIST.pdf
The following plants are not on the list: Cuphea llavea \ Bat-face cuphea, Aptenia cordifolia / Hearts of flowers, Justicia brandegeana, / Shrimp plant, Cuphea hyssopifolia / Mexican heather. Revise plant selection as necessary.

2. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Dimention interior border adjacent to vehicle use area. (One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4).
02/17/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
02/25/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: February 28, 2011
SUBJECT: 2901 E Blacklidge Drive- Site/Grading Plan 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Quatro Vest. Inc.
LOCATION: T13S R14E Sec32 Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T10CM03518 (Site Plan) and T10BU01875 (Grading Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T10CM03518) and grading plan (T10BU01875) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan and/or Keynote #18 to provide a construction detail for the proposed 6-inch extruded curbing that surround the vehicular use area (VUA). If a separate detail is not provided then the Keynote must clearly state 6"x6" extruded curbing, revise.

2) Completed.

3) Acknowledged.

4) Acknowledged.

5) Acknowledged.

6) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise Keynote #4 to call out the Standard Detail # for the vertical curbing that is required to infill the existing driveway. Specifically PC/COT Standard Detail #209 (either Type 1 or Type 1(G)). It is acknowledged that a right-of-way use permit has already been issued however the infill still needs to be shown correctly on the site plan with the correct detail.

7) Acknowledged.

8) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: The reason the area adjacent to the PAAL does not comply with the referenced standard is that a majority of the sidewalk onsite is only dimensioned at 3'-6" not the required 4-foot clear. Revise the plan sheets to correctly label the required 4-foot minimum clear width for all onsite sidewalks per DS Sec.2-08.5.1.A.

9) Acknowledged.

10) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the plan set and/or Keynote #20 for the proposed scuppers to meet the minimum Standard Detail for Public Improvement. A Type 1 scupper is the minimum dimensions that will be accepted. Provided a detail that shows the construction of the scupper or reference the Standard Detail # in the Keynote. The dimensioned 4"x6"x3/16" does not meet the minimum dimensions shown in Standard Detail #204 of 6"x6"x3/8", revise.

11) Completed.

12) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise Keynote #3 on the plan set to provide the specifications for the proposed filter fabric under the rock rip rap splash pads. Since the plan set is to be used as the construction document all details and dimensions must be called out or a separate detail for construction is required. Or at a minimum the Keynote can reference "Standard Specification for Public Improvement Section 1014" for the construction of the filter fabric.

13) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the plan set or Keynote #5 to provide a construction detail in plan view for the depressed curb cuts showing all aspects of construction. The comment response is correct with referencing PC/COT Standard Detail #212 for the terminal section however the Keynote still only references a depressed curb opening. If a depressed curb is being proposed then a separate detail must be provided for construction purposes with a reference to a concrete header (Standard Detail #213) along with the terminal section per PC/COT Standard Detail #212, revise.

14) Completed.

15) Restated: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise the site plan to label the recordation information for all existing and proposed easements in plan view. The site plan can not be approved until all recordation information is provided on the plan set to verify legal conformance with access and parking.

16) Acknowledged.


GRADIN PLAN:

17) Restated: Provide filter fabric specifications either in Keynote #3 or as a separate detail for all proposed splash pads for construction purposes. See comment above.

18) Restated: Provide a reference or separate detail for all proposed improvements for construction purposes. Any detail must at a minimum meet the requirements within the PC/COT Standard Details for Public Improvement. Since this plan set is to be used as the construction document all improvements to be constructed must be shown with dimensions, details, labels, etc.

19) Completed.

20) Restated: Including a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). The note could not be located on the plan set, clarify.

21) Restated: Provide a general note stating that all proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning Development Services Departments. The note could not be located on the plan set, clarify.

22) Acknowledged.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site and grading plan set that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/03/2011 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/03/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed