Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T10CM03492
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/05/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the size of the water service to the new kitchen. The plumbing floor plan (1/P1.1) indicates a 1-1/4" water service but the plumbing site plan (2/P1.1) calls for a 1-1/2" water service. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Detail 4/P2.1 calls for the water heater having a set point of 180 degrees Fahrenheit. Show how scald protection is to be provided. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Include all fixtures and the water requirements of the HVAC equipment when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Revise the submitted water pressure calculations using the minimum daily water pressure. Reference: Section A3.3, UPC 2006. 5. A demand flow of 98 GPM through a 2" water meter results in an excessive pressure drop and a velocity greater than the maximum 8 FPS allowed for either plastic or copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006. 6. Clarify the manufacturer and model of the hydromechanical grease interceptor to be installed; the plumbing plan calls for a Schier "Great Basin" unit but the Architectural plans call for a Dormont "WD-50" unit. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 7. The Schier "Great Basin" model GB-250 is listed as a gravity grease interceptor, ASME Standard A112.14.3. A gravity grease interceptor shall be sized per Table 10-3, UPC 2006 or the maximum drainage fixture units allowed for the size of the inlet pipe. Reference: Section 1014.3.6.1, UPC 2006. |
| 01/05/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/12/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM03492 2727 N Fairview The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following: 1. Sheet E-2, circuit KE-1 on power plan should be KE-2, Circuits KE-28,30 should be KM-28,30. 2. KE-8 listed as spare in Panel ,used in plan. 3. Sheet E-2, keynote #10 list a 100 amp disconnect fused at 90 amps, Sheet E-4 list a 200 amp disconnect fused at 150 amps feeding the new 112.5 kva transformer. The conductors sizes are also different for each. 4. Sheet E-2 shows a disconnect for Keynote #17, there appears to be a piece of electrical equipment in this area, will the required clearance be met ? 5. The total va's for Panel KE are incorrect, when adding the total of each phase and using 65% deration for kitchen equipment, the total is different. Ray T Majaauta, Elect Pln Ck, PDSD,City of Tucson, 1/12/11, Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/18/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |