Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM03232
Parcel: 10610015A

Address:
3655 N ROMERO RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T10CM03232
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/14/2011 CPIERCE1 BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review
02/14/2011 CPIERCE1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review
02/14/2011 CPIERCE1 ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review
02/14/2011 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
02/14/2011 CPIERCE1 ZONING HC REVIEW Needs Review
12/03/2010 SREEVES1 ADA REVIEW Passed
12/06/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Sheet C1
1. The life safety information states the project has alarms, panic hardware, and smoke detection. None of the are shown on the plan.

Sheet A1.1

The garage has an occupant load greater than 10. A swinging exit door is required by IFC Section 1008.1.2.
12/10/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the plumbing code that was used to design the addition and tenant improvement for this building. The Building Code Summary on sheet C1 calls out the 2006 UPC but the Code Analysis Data sheet submitted with the drawings calls out the 2006 IPC. This review was made using the 2006 UPC.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the location and size of the water meter
b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants
c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned)
d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer
e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer
f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the next upstream and the next downstream manholes
g. the first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2006, for business occupancy.
4. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater WH-1. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
5. Show how the water supply piping for the evaporative coolers is to be protected from freezing. Reference: Section 313.6, UPC 2006.
6. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006
7. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006.
12/10/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to show the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly serving the office building. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 and Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
12/13/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Clarify the termination of the drains for the evaporative coolers. Drains may not terminate in an area that is not capable of absorbing the liquid flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 908.6, IMC 2006.
12/14/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 3655 N. Romero Road
T10CM03231 & T10CM03232
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2010

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Submit a site plan that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-02.0. Based on the provided building plan the site review is for full code compliance due to a building expansion of greater than 25%.

3. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm03231.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
12/14/2010 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 14, 2010
SUBJECT: 3655 N Romero Road Site Plan- Engineering Review
TO: Eric Miller
LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec27 Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T10CM03231 and T10CM03232


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed building plan applications (T10CM03231 and T10CM03232) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plans at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


DRAINAGE REPORT:

1) DS Sec.10-01 and 10-02 and Chapter 26 Tucson Code: Provide a Drainage Report showing conformance with the Critical Basin requirements for this site along with all Floodplain related issues. The subject property falls within a Critical Basin watershed and within a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AO1 and Shaded Zone X 100-year floodplain per the Flood Insurance Rate Maps 04019C1619K. Provide a report that discuss and details all aspects of the Development Standards and Floodplain Ordinance.

2) Verify if the existing structures are in conformance with Chapter 26 of the Tucson Code. Due to the location of the structures within the FEMA AO1 floodplain the minimum finished floor elevation (FFE) for both structures must be 2-feet above the highest adjacent natural grade. Provide 2 Elevation Certificates (one for each structure) verifying FFE requirements. If the structures are not elevated to the required 2-foot elevation then the project falls under a Substantial Improvement review per Section 26-4.1 "Non-conforming Development."


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

3) Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section the site plan will be reviewed for conformance with Tucson Code Chapter 26 "Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management" and Development Standards Sec.2-02, 3-01, 3-05, 6-01, 10-01, 10-02 and 11-01. Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within the referenced sections and are reflected on the site plan sheets.

4) Provide a General Note to state that this property is subject to City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Chapter 26 of the Tucson Code due to the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area per the Flood Insurance Rate Maps 04019C1619K.

5) Provide a General Note to state that a Floodplain Use Permit is required for both structures and for any other work proposed within the regulatory 100-year floodplain. The Floodplain Use Permits are required with the site plan application.

6) Provide a General Note to state the floodplain determination per FEMA FIRM Panel #1619K. Per the referenced panel the property falls within a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AO1 and Shaded Zone X 100-year floodplain.

7) Clearly delineate on the site plan the 100-year floodplain limit per the referenced panel.

8) Be advised that further comments will be forth coming on submittal of the site plan and Floodplain Use Permits.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a site plan, 2 Floodplain Use Permits, 2 Elevation Certificates (these may be produced and picked up at the Engineering Counter at Planning & Development Services for your surveyor) and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon submittal of the site plan and Floodplain Use Permit review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/14/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed