Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T10CM03165
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/10/2010 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/15/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Fire access roads are required per IFC Section 503 for all structures over 150 feet fro the street. The new fire hydrant needs to be relocated so all portions of the buildings have a less than 300 foot hose lay from it. |
| 11/16/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | Site Drawings are incomplete. There is not sufficient design and detailing provided to conduct a plan review. |
| 11/18/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter (if one exists or is planned) b. the location of any main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer (if one exists or is planned) e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer (if one exists or is planned) f. the location of any septic tank and leach field on the property. g. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes h. the first floor elevation for any buildings connected to the public sanitary sewer. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. The site plan shows two barns that are 84' x 84' and a hay barn that is 60' x 60'. Where is the RCA barn (85' x 98') located? |
| 11/19/2010 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T10CM03165 9740 East Escalante Road Commercial Stables TRANSMITTAL: November 24, 2010 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. See Development Standard 2-02 for site plan content and instruction. 1) This site is located in the SR zone (LUC Section 2.2.4.2). The proposed use is under the Agricultural Use Group (LUC Section 6.3.3) as Commercial Stables. This use on the site is subject to LUC Sections 3.5.2.1.A.2 and 3.5.2.1.B.2: LUC Sections 3.5.2.1.A.2: "All stables, barns, and animal sheds or shelters must be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from any property line." And Section 3.2.2.1.B.2: "A stock-tight fence and necessary cattle guards shall be erected and maintained along the boundaries of any area where livestock is kept or grazed. This provision shall not apply to interior lot lines where the adjacent property is zoned IR or to open range as determined under Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS)." 2) The Development Designator is "2" (LUC Section 2.2.4.2.B.1.a). The minimum site area is ten (10) acres (LUC Section 3.2.3.2). The maximum floor-area-ration (FAR) is 0.06 (LUC Section 3.2.3.2). The maximum lot coverage is 10% (LUC Section). The maximum building height is thirty (30) feet (LUC Section 3.2.3.2). The Perimeter Yard Indicator is FF (LUC Section 3.2.3.2). The minimum setback equals four (4) times the height (H) of each structure's wall facing any interior property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). 3) As per the letter from William Balak, dated February 19, 2010 provide a copy of the lease agreement with the Pima County Regional Flood Control District as described there in. The site must be a minimum of ten (10) acres for the proposed use in this zone (LUC Section 3.2.3.2). 4) Provide all text and dimension is a minimum of twelve (12) point type and do not use half tones for dimensions. 5) Revise the building locations. The locations for the barns and the arena are within the required setbacks. A) The minimum setback for all structures on the site equals four (4) times the height of each wall of any structure facing any interior lot line (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). The height measurement for setbacks is from design grade (ground level not finish grade) to the highest point of each wall facing a property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.3). Revise the height measurement. B) The minimum setback for all barns, stables and animal-structures, is one hundred (100) to any property line (LUC Section 3.5.2.1.A.2). 6) Provide the legal description on the site plan (DS 2-02.1.A.2). Provide the legal for existing property and the leased area. See comment #3. 7) Provide the sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the site plan (DS 2-02.1.A.2.10). 8) Fully dimension the point of egress and ingress including the locations widths of the driveways (DS 2-02.2.1.A.11). 9) Clearly depict vehicular, pedestrian and handicapped circulation on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.12). Pedestrian access must be provided to the public street (LUC Section 3.2.8.3.B). There must be continuous pedestrian circulation from all elements to the street, including all structures and vehicle use areas (DS 2-08.3.1). See access comments by Ron Brown for further information pertaining to sidewalks and accessible parking. 10) Provide the location, type, size and height of all proposed signage ((DS 2-02.2.1.A.13). 11) Fully dimension the right-of-way (ROW) on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19). 12) "All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference" (DS 2-02.2.1.A.20). 13) Provide the proposed lighting layout on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.25). 14) Provide the zoning of this parcel and all adjacent parcels, including those across the streets and alleys, on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A). 15) Provide the propose use (Commercial Stables, Development Designator "2") on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.31). 16) Clearly delineate and dimension the refuse location, the access to and the size of the containers or dumpsters (DS 2-02.2.1.A.32). 17) Provide the gross and net lot area (DS 2-02.2.2.A.1). See comment #3. 18) Provide the square footage of each structure on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.2.A.2). 19) Provide the lot coverage calculation and the floor-area (FAR) calculation on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.2.A.3). 20) Please be aware that there may be additional comments relative information provided with subsequent site plan submittals. |
| 12/01/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This site is reviewed under full code compliance all landscape requirements apply. 2. Submit a separate landscape plan to verify that the site meets minimum requirements. 3. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3. 4. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Dimension street landscape border on plan. 5. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 6. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. Include calculation on 7. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 8. A 5' screen is required for adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 9. Provide a copy of the lease agreement with the Pima County Regional Flood Control District. Include Flood Plain Limits on the site and landscape plans. " The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following information: " Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. " Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. " Material and areas of inert ground cover. 10. Add the following notes to the landscape plan: DS 2-06.6.0 MAINTENANCE STANDARDS. a. Any plant material in areas of required landscaping that does not survive will be replaced with an equivalent size and species within thirty (30) days. b. Plant material will be pruned as necessary to control size but not to disrupt the natural growth pattern or characteristic form of the plant except as necessary to achieve height clearance for visibility and pedestrian passage or to achieve a continuous opaque hedge if required. c. Clipping and pruning of the plant material are required to allow maximum shading while preserving surveillance opportunities and preventing obstructive overhang into walks, curb areas, drives, and line of sight triangles. For general guidelines on height clearance of tree canopies, refer to Sec. 2-06.3.6.D, Sec. 2-06.3.6.E, Sec. 2-06.3.6.F, and Sec. 2-06.3.7.D. d. All dead or removed plant material will be replaced with plant material acceptable under the requirements of the xeriscape landscaping regulations. Replacement material will be a minimum fifteen (15) gallon size for trees and five (5) gallon size for shrubs. e. Regular landscape maintenance should ensure water efficiency and include, but not be limited to, pruning, mulching, weeding, and litter removal. 10. Include NPP plan or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. The site does contain protected native plants revise application to read, Protected Native Plants will not be substantially impacted by the development on this site. Note: Any person who, individually or through the acts of another person, intentionally or negligently damages, destroys, or removes from the site any Protected Native Plant, except as authorized by an approved Native Plant Preservation Plan, shall be subject to provisions within LUC 3.8.7. 11. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 12. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. 13. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 13. Note the following comments apply to this site. Trail Requirements: The draft Pima Regional Trail System includes a framework of significant trail corridors that include the Santa Cruz, Rillito, and Pantano River Parks, the Houghton Road Greenway, and the Julian Wash Greenway. These five interconnected corridors are at the heart of the regional trail system and form a continuous "Loop" surrounding the City of Tucson's central core. The vast majority of trails within the Pima Regional Trail System connect either directly or indirectly to the "Loop." Each of the five trail corridors that form the "Loop" include shared use pathways. The Santa Cruz, Rillito, and Pantano River parks include shared use pathways on one or both sides of the river, as well as encourage equestrian use and hiking along the bottom of those drainages. Pantano River Park (RP002) The 18-mile Pantano River Park is located on the east side of the metropolitan area. The Pantano River Park corridor begins at the northern end of the Cienega Creek Preserve and terminates at its confluence with the Rillito River and the Tanque Verde Wash. At the south end of the Pantano corridor, a geographic feature called the Pantano Bluffs, located on the west bank, represents a significant challenge for River Park siting. A number of significant drainages and erosion cuts in this area will need to be addressed to implement the River Park. Implementation Developers whose projects encompass or abut the various elements included in this plan shall provide the right-of-way, as necessary, to implement them, consistent with expressed standards. Certain elements along roadways may be partially accommodated in the existing public right-of-way, if sufficient right-of-way exists. However, if sufficient public right-of-way does not exist, or if staff determines the final product will not provide the desired quality of experience, the developer shall provide additional right-of-way to achieve the desired minimum corridor widths as set forth in the design standards section of this plan. Developers constructing residential or commercial projects that abut one of the features of the system will be required to provide a corridor for and/or construct the subject feature. Projects located in proximity to a corridor (i.e. within one mile) will be required to contribute to the development of that (or those) system elements. River Park Design DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Corridor Width. The minimum corridor width for River Parks is 100 feet on both river banks. However, additional space is recommended wherever possible to help enhance the quality and impact of the river park system, reduce the urban heat island effect, and allow for the restoration of the wildlife habit that once existed along the edges of the community's major watercourses. Encroachment. New development shall not encroach into River Park corridors. Dedication. New development adjacent to River Park corridors shall dedicate the 100-foot minimum corridor on their side of the river (or both if applicable) and construct the amenities consistent with this plan. Design Integration. Urban design that integrates residential and commercial projects into the River Park corridor is welcome and shall be strongly encouraged. Development should not "turn its back" on River Parks, thereby creating an unsightly and undesirable condition of loading docks and dumpsters in view of the River Parks. Combined Public Corridor. Where opportunities occur to add publicly-owned property adjacent to River Parks, such as paralleling right-of-way or public park, these lands should be combined in to one large public corridor. Connectivity. Enhance connectivity to community features, such as parks, schools, commercial centers, offices, and neighborhoods by supplementing the recommendations of this plan and provide additional linked routes and connections to the River Park system. Edge Porosity. The concept of "porosity" shall be integrated into River Park design, with many opportunities to enter and exit the corridor. This will enhance safety, convenience, and connectivity. Bridges. Bridges should be as fl at as possible so as not to block sight lines and enhance user safety. Underpasses. Wherever possible, separate equestrian underpasses under bridges should be provided for safety reasons. Landscape. Landscaping shall be native and water harvesting techniques should be integrated wherever possible. Respite Areas. Provide respite areas with seat walls, plazas, and other design features at logical locations along River Parks. Compliment amenities at entry nodes and trailhead. Corridor Width- 100 feet minimum, both river banks Path/Trail- Path and trail corridor on both sides of river Vertical Clearance- 12-foot minimum Side Clearance- Three feet high by three feet wide each side of trail and four-foot shoulder of path for vegetation or obstacles 24 inches from nearest pipe rails Clearance to Thorny Plants- Minimum ten feet Clearance to Trees- Minimum six feet (provide minimum ten-foot clearance between trees and sewer lines) Signs-Wayfinding, directional, and interpretive See P. 63 of the Pima Regional Trails System for the trail construction cross-section. |
| 12/03/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Include NPP plan or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. The site does contain protected native plants revise application to read, Protected Native Plants will not be substantially impacted by the development on this site. Note: Any person who, individually or through the acts of another person, intentionally or negligently damages, destroys, or removes from the site any Protected Native Plant, except as authorized by an approved Native Plant Preservation Plan, shall be subject to provisions within LUC 3.8.7. |
| 12/09/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/09/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/09/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |