Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM02964
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Sheet A3.0 A ship's ladder is not allowed for egress. An alternating stair may be accepted if it complies with IFC 1009.9. The details of the stair called out on this sheet (95 on A9.4 and 9 on A8.3) are not there. |
| 10/26/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T10CM02964 266 E Congress Street TI - Restaurant and C of O (Food Service Use) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 26, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Per LUC Section 2.8.10.2 Rio Nuevo and Downtown Zone (RND) Applicability: The provisions of the RND zone apply to the following uses on all property, including public or private rights-of-way, any portion of which is located within the RND zone. No permit shall be issued by the City except in accordance with the requirements of this Section. A. All new structures, including expansions to existing structures. The remainder of a structure that has been expanded is governed by provisions in force at the time of initial approval for the structure. B. All improvements or alterations to the exterior of existing structures, if such improvements or alterations are visible from and adjacent public right-of-way. C. All sidewalk and street improvements. Based on applicability standards A and B listed above, the proposed rear patio for "The Hub" requires DRB review for compliance with RND criteria and a Director's Decision. Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) review might also be required if the building is eligible or on the National Registry of Historic Places. Contact Jonathan Mabry regarding HPZ. 2. After reviewing the unapproved version of the site plan it is clear that the outside patio for this suite was never included for review and approval. A revised site plan for the overall block is required prior to any approval by zoning. A site plan for the overall site will be required for review and approval. The site plan must include all Zoning Data, info related to the DRB review such as date of approval, conditions of approval and any if applicable MDRs. 3. Site information/comments cannot be provided without a complete site plan. Ensure that an application for a site plan is applied for. Site fees will apply. ***As a note: A separate site plan related to the An's Restaurant has been submitted for review but does not address the proposed changes to this building and therefore the previous DRB did not address any changes to this suite or proposed expansions. It may be worth while looking into the possibility of coordinating the next site plan submittal by the Design Professionals working on the An Restaurant to incorporate this expansion. (It is only a suggestion.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T10CM02964.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/29/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/01/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide fixture descriptions for the lavatory and lavatory faucet. All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, NSF, UPC, etc). Reference: Sections 301.1.1 and 401.1, UPC 2006. 2. Water-free urinals are not Code-compliant fixtures per the UPC. Submit an appeal to the Building Official requesting approval to utilize a water-free urinal based on the International Plumbing Code. Reference: Sections 211.0 (insanitary), 301.2, 405.2, 409.0, 601.1, and 1005.0, UPC 2006. 3. Appliances (e.g. chemical dispensers for 003. 071, and 080) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 4. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters (i.e. WH-7) located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 5. Clarify the dimensions for the SCW manifold shown in detail 2/P2.0; it is shown as ¾" and 2". 6. Clarify how the expansion tank shown in detail 2/P2.0 is supposed to accommodate excessive water pressure for WH-7. Reference: Sections 310.4 and 608.3, UPC 2006. 7. Provide a sequence of operation for the hot water recirculation system. Reference: Section 504.6, IECC 2006. 8. Permission to use a single gravity grease interceptor to serve multiple business establishments requires an appeal to the building official. Reference: sections 301.2 and 1014.3.4.3, UPC 2006. 9. The grease interceptor calculation indicates 99 fixture units being connected to the existing grease interceptor which would require a 1500-gallon interceptor. Verify the capacity of the existing grease interceptor. Reference: Sections 101.5.1 and 1014.3.6, UPC 2006. 10. The grease interceptor calculation indicates 99 fixture units being connected to the existing grease interceptor with 38 fixture units coming from the new restaurant. The maximum number of fixture units that can be accommodated by a 3" pipe is 35 fixture units. The drawing also indicates that the existing grease interceptor has a 3" inlet. This appears to be too small to accommodate the existing 61 fixture units from the existing restaurant. Reference: Section 703.2, UPC 2006. 11. Clarify the inlet piping to the existing gravity grease interceptor. Sheet P1.0 appears to show only the new restaurant being attached to the interceptor. Show how the existing restaurant is connected to the grease interceptor. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1014.3.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 11/01/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show that the installation of the three Type I hoods complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 for clearances (i.e. the construction of all walls within 18" of the hoods comply with the requirements of Section 507.9, IMC 2006). |
| 11/01/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET a1.0; PROJECT DATA: IT IS INDICATED UNDER THE "CODE REVIEW/PARKING" THAT "STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED" IS NA. THERE ARE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 2. SHEET a1.0; PROJECT DATA (OCCUPANCY): THE SECOND FLOOR STORAGE AREA IS GIVEN AN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OF "M". REVISE. 3. SHEET a1.0; GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY: THIS TABLE INDICATES THERE ARE NO "NONSEPARATED USES". VERIFY. 4. SHEET a1.1; EXITING PLAN: BECAUSE THE REAR EXIT DOOR IS NOT ACCESSIBLE, PROVIDE VERBIAGE ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THAT COMPLIANCE WITH IBC SECTION 3409.6 IS TECHNICALLY INFEASIBLE, AND "THE ALTERATION SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE". 5. SHEET a1.1; DEVELOPER PLAN NOTES: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT PER CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS. REVISE. 6. SHEETS a1.1 AND a3.0; EXITING PLAN: THE EXIT GATE 118 AT THE EXTERIOR WALKWAY SHOULD OPEN IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION (IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL) PER IBC SECTION 1008.1.2. VERIFY. 7. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE MOP SINK (FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTE 11) APPEARS TO BE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS BUILDING. VERIFY. 8. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 11 REFERENCES DETAIL 24/a9.1. REVISE. 9. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 2 REFERENCES SHEET a2.1. REVISE. 10. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES ACCESSIBLE SEATING AND STANDING SPACES (PER IBC SECTION 1108.2.8.1) ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. INDICATE ON THE PLAN WHERE THESE ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED. 11. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 12 REFERENCES DETAIL 19/a9.1. REVISE. 12. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 40 REFERENCES SHEET a7.1. REVISE. 13. SHEET a3.2; PLAN: REVISE THE PLAN REFERENCE (INDICATES FLOOR PLAN). 14. SHEET S4; DETAIL 403(B): IS DETAIL B PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/03/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 11/05/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO PROVIDE PAGE K-1 AS REF BY PAGE P4.0 SO DIRECT WASTE CAN BE DETERMINED NEED WASTEWATER CREDITS EVALUATED BY WW MAPS & RECORDS 5TH FLOOR PWB 740-6602 NEED REVIEW/APPROVAL OF GREASSSSE INTERCEPTOR BY IWC - TOM TOMCHAK - 5025 W INA RD - 443-6200 |
| 11/05/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10cm02964 TI Restaurant "The Hub" 266 E Congress The grounding systems for the Services are required to be bonded together per 2005 NEC 250.58. Show on plan this is to be installed and show size and type of bond. Ray T Majuta, PDSD,City of Tucson, Elect PLan Ck, 11/08/10 520-837/4988 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/18/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/18/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |