Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02879
Parcel: 13337005B

Review Status: Active

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T10CM02879
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/18/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Need fire access box at gate and can't park at circle in front of residence. Parts of the residence are further than 150 ft. from the street.
10/18/2010 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed Not A COT owned and/or operated property
10/22/2010 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T10CM02879
900 North Circle D Way
Religious Use


TRANSMITTAL: October 26, 2010


COMMENTS: A Development Plan and a Landscape Plan is required for this site.


1) This site is located in the RX-1 Zone (LUC Section 2.3.2). The existing use is a single-family residential (SFR) (LUC Section 2.3.2.A.1). The proposed use is religions (LUC Section 2.3.2.2.C.4).

2) The Development Designator for the SFR is "D" (LUC Section 2.3.2.2.A.1). The minimum lot size is 36,000 square feet in this zone. (See Board of Adjustment variance conditions for this site.) The maximum number of units is one (1) per lot. The perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.A).

3) The Development Designator for Religious Use is "9" (LUC Section 2.3.2.2.C.4). This Development Designator is applicable to nonresidential uses when permitted in a residential zone (LUC Section 3.2.3.2). ["Religious Use. Religious Use is assembly for religious worship. Typical uses include churches, synagogues, and temples" (LUC Section 6.3.4.10).]

4) A Development Plan and Landscape Plan is required for this site (Annexation C0-84-65, Ordinance 6176 {SECTION 2, 1}). Provide all the information required for a Development Plan (See Development Standard 2-05 or if you are using a Development Package 2-01) on the plans.

5) Provide the case number (C10-96-03) for the Board of Adjustment variance granted on 24th of January in 1996 on the Development Plan. Provide the variance granted and the conditions imposed on the Development Plan.

6) Religious Use is a principle use on this site, and cannot be a secondary use to a Residential Use in this zone (LUC Section 2.3.2.4.A). Therefore there are at least two (2) principle uses on this site. These uses must be fully accounted for on the Development Plan. See Development Standards 2-05 or 2-01 and provide all the information required on the Development Plan and the Landscape Plan.

7) There appears to be a third Use on the property of Animal Production "9" (LUC Section 2.3.2.2.B.1). This Use is subject to LUC Sections 3.5.2.1.A.1, .B.1, .B.2 and .C.1 in this zone.

8) Please be aware that Civic Assembly is not a Permitted Land Use in any residential zone (LUC Sections 2.2.1 through 2.3.8). ["Civic Assembly. Civic Assembly is a use providing for meetings, conventions and trade fairs, exhibitions, and other community, social, and multipurpose uses. Typical uses include convention centers, neighborhood centers, and community centers" (LUC Section 6.3.4.3).]

9) All subsequent submittals must be as a Development Plan by way of the Development Plan submittal and review process.
10/26/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied A meaningful accessible review can not be conducted at this time until Zoning definations have been determined as to the commerical aspects of this facility.
10/28/2010 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/28/2010,

According to Zoning comments, the subject project can not be reviewed as a site plan. Resubmit the project as a development plan for review.
11/02/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied A NPPO plan per DS 2-15 & LUC 3.8.0 is required, or provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants.
11/02/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied A Development Plan per DS 2-05 including a Landscape plan per DS 2-06, DS 2-07 & LUC 3.7.0 is required for this site.
11/09/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site plan to include the existing utility information required by the City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/10/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF RECEIVED