Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM02835
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following fire to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030. |
| 10/21/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: COT Backflow Prevention Ordinance, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf 2. Provide the size of the proposed water meter and the calculated water demand that the meter will serve. (Meters must also be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water.) Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006. |
| 10/21/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bravo Brio @ Tucson Mall T10CM02835 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 21, 2010 The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. It appears that changes are proposed to the site area located to the south of the building, i.e. 12 x 35 loading space removed, refuse area removed. A revision to the development plan is required prior to approval of the building plan. Provide a gross floor area for the entire building and the outdoor patio dining area as the building footprint has been changed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm02835.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 10/22/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the energy code analysis, using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. there are several wall and roof types shown on the plans but only one type of each on the calculations). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration components. Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Clarify the reason for RTU-2 having two condensate drains. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 304.1, IMC 2006. 5. Revise the condensate trap detail for the rooftop air conditioning units to include trap dimensions that are in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006. 6. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities are used. Provide complete calculations to show that the building is capable of providing the required ventilation rates whenever the building is occupied, including during full-load conditions. All zones in the building that are being ventilated shall be included in the calculations. Reference: Sections 6.2.2, 6.2.2.2, 6.2.2.3, 6.2.5, and 6.2.6.1, ASHRAE 62.1-2004. 7. Clarify the construction of the grease exhaust duct for the pizza oven; the "wood-fired pizza oven venting notes" on sheet H-1 offer several duct construction choices. The minimum thickness for a stainless steel Type I grease duct is 0.044-inch (18-gage) per Section 506.3.1, IMC 2006. 8. The grease duct for hood #3 is shown as 18"x12" on sheet H-2 which will result in a duct velocity less than the required 1500 FPM. Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 9. Provide information to show that the operation of the Type I hoods and the hood exhaust fans comply with Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. 10. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 11. The HVAC plan shows an air diffuser within six feet of hood #3 which is not in accordance with the hood manufacture's listing information. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006. 12. Clarify the heating capacity of the make-up air unit; 800 BTUH input as shown on the make-up air unit schedule or 800 MBH? 13. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. If a duct smoke detector is desired in the supply duct, it shall be in addition to the required duct smoke detector in the return duct. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. |
| 10/22/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide information to show that the hub drain (P16) complies with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006. 2. Show that the restroom floors slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 3. Water heaters with inputs of 200,000 BTUH or greater are classified as boilers and require approval from the Arizona Boiler Inspector. Reference: Title 20, Chapter 5, Article 4, Arizona Administrative Code. 4. Coordinate the water heater detail with the fixture specifications, plans and riser diagrams. Clarify the type of water heater being installed; i.e. is it an indoor or outdoor model? Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Show that the installation of the vacuum relief valve for the water heater complies with the manufacturer's listing requirements (i.e. no valves located between the vacuum relief valve and the water heater). Reference: Section 310.4, UPC 2006. 6. If the water heater is to be located on the mezzanine, provide combustion air openings for the water heater. Reference: Section 507, UPC 2006. 7. If the water heater is to be located on the mezzanine, provide a watertight pan of corrosion-resistant material under the water heater with a drain to an approved location. Reference: Section 508.4, UPC 2006. 8. Show the size and route of the T&P drain pipe from the water heater. Clarify the termination point of the T&P drain pipe. (Discharge into a water heater pan is prohibited per Section 508.5, UPC 2006.) Reference: Section 608.5, UPC 2006. 9. Show that the termination of the vent for the water heater complies with the requirements of Section 510.6.2, UPC 2006. 10. Clarify the pipe names shown on the water heater detail on sheet P-1 as compared to the pipe names shown on sheet P-3. 11. Show how the specified mixing valve and the hot water storage tank are to be installed with the water heater. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 12. Appliances (e.g. coffee brewers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 13. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 14. The branch piping sizes called out for the urinal flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. 15. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 16. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006. 17. Revise the slope of the horizontal drainage piping to comply with the requirements of Section 708.0, UPC 2006. 18. Show that the floor drains used as indirect receptors for condensate are designed to prevent splashing. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006. 19. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 20. Clarify the nature of the 2-compartment sink (S2A) and the Soap Sink (S9). Depending on their use, an indirect connection may not be appropriate. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2, UPC 2006. 21. Sinks which cannot be vented because they are located in a bar may use indirect waste connections provided that the indirect waste receptor is properly vented and the developed length from the fixture outlet to the receptor does not exceed five feet. Reference: Section 801.3, UPC 2006. 22. Provide a vent for each fixture trap. Reference: Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 2006. 23. Each vent pipe shall rise vertically to a minimum of 6" above the flood-level rim of the fixture it serves before offsetting horizontally or connecting to any other vent. Reference: Section 905.3, UPC 2006. 24. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Provide roof drainage calculations and dimensions for the gutters and downspouts for the patio canopy and tower roofs. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. 25. Revise the overflow drain (detail on sheet P-4) to include a strainer. Reference: Section 1105.2, UPC 2006. 26. If the tops of the roof drain overflows are to be installed level with the high point of the roof, as noted on sheet P-4, provide structural calculations to show that the roof can support the weight of water that will accumulate if the primary roof drains are blocked and the water level rises to 11.5" above the low point of the roof. Reference: Section 1101.11.2, UPC 2006 and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. 27. Revise the natural gas schematic to show the developed lengths of the piping from the gas meter to each gas service point. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1217.0, UPC 2006. 28. Revise the specified insulation thickness for the recirculating hot water piping per Section 504.5, IECC 2006. 29. Show how the recirculating hot water system complies with the control requirements of Section 504.6, IECC 2006. |
| 10/22/2010 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 28, 2010 TO: Josh Potter, P.E. SUBJECT: Tucson Mall BRIO Restaurant Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. ACTIVITY NUMBER: T10CM02835 LOCATION: FEMA 1636K X-Unshaded SUMMARY: Engineering has received and reviewed the Brio Tuscan Grille construction drawings for review. Separate grading permit will be required. Engineering does not recommend approval of the building plans at this time. Grading comments are provided and may be addressed on a site or civil plan sheet or an additional plan sheet may be added to the plan set. See the following comments to address. SITE / GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) The unlabeled site plan sheet need to address the following grading and site related comments on this sheet or other sheets: a. Label sheet number on the bottom right corner of the site plan sheet, which is the sheet which is placed before the Site Layout Plan A-0.1. b. Provide clarification of elevations adjacent to the project; provide cross section with proposed general grades/slopes/elevations with respect to proposed bldg FFE, including retaining wall systems with elevations. Clarify how change of grades for this region of the Tucson Mall affects this proposed restaurant. c. In the south and along east PAAL areas show additional spot elevations and flow arrows to assure that no potential ponding areas are created. d. Sidewalk is needed along south side of proposed building from edge of last parking stall connecting to proposed concrete sidewalk at southeast corner of proposed building. e. For south area adjacent to the south side of the proposed building, assure minimum 4-ft dimensioned sidewalk is provided. f. Dimension the PAAL width for south and east PAAAL areas on planview. Assure dimension is labeled using "EOP to EOP" or other clarifier for inspection purposes. g. Show limits of asphalt paving extents on planview. h. Maneuverability for both the loading zone trucks and the solid waste vehicles must be clarified. Check whether there is additional area available for backing up for these types of vehicles to the west of the parking area south of the proposed Brio Restaurant. Show movement maneuverability with radii labeled and design vehicle used on a detail or on planview. i. Provide FFE for adjacent building to the north. j. Check adjacent plans for other developments, for utility information that may affect this site. It may be useful to obtain the title report and compare the utilities affecting this site. Show and label all utility easements on planview, and/or add note for any blanket easements. Utility easements that are in conflict of proposed building footprints will need to be addressed prior to final approvals. Call to discuss. k. Show and label existing or proposed sidewalk for handicap stalls located tot eh northeast of the proposed building. l. For safety reasons, show SVT for vehicles facing east entering east loop road PAAL. Consider limiting vegetation for clear view of vehicles traveling south on east PAAL. m. See redlines for consultant's use, for clarification of some of the above comments. 2) On roof plan or other plan sheet, show roof drainage direction and provide scuppers with labeled locations on the site plan/grading plan sheet. 3) Provide the following in resubmittal: a. A grading permit application with the next submittal. b. A copy of latest title report. c. A copy of the Geotechnical Report (copy of a geotechnical report from adjacent project may be submitted) d. Response letter including sheet number for the correction if not addressed on the site plan sheet. For any questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 10/28/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. As per zoning comments: "A revision to the development plan is required prior to approval of the building plan." a. As part of this revision, at least two accessible parking spaces should be relocated to the south parking row adjacent to the building thereby complying with the 2006 IBC, Section 1106.6.2. 2. Vestibule 100 is not accessible as required by ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 404.2.5. Please revise and resubmit. 3. The men's toilet room #112, the clear width space needs to be 3'-0" as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 305.7. 4. Please provide a large scale detail of the employee's toilet and interior elevations showing compliance with ICC (ANSI 117.1) accessibility requirements. 5. Please provide accessible spaces at the bar as per 2006 IBC, Section 1108.2.8.1. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/29/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A list of Special Inspections has been included in the Conditions section of this permit application. Please have the engineer of record review this list for accuracy as required by the 2006 IBC, Sections 106 and 1704. If any inspections are deemed unnecessary, please provide a letter or an email from the engineer of record stating so. Please provide the proper Special Inspection Certifications completed for review and approval. 2. Please provide a large scale plan of the employees' toilet plus interior elevations. 3. All exit gates of the patio must comply with the 2006 IBC, Section 1008.1.9, Panic Hardware. 4. Please provide structural calculations for the hot water storage tank. 5. Please provide a guard rail at the roof hatch as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1013.5. 6. Please provide large scale details of the patio stairs and the building exit ramp. Insure all accessible dimensions and requirements are shown in compliance with Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1). The handrail shown on the stairs is non compliant. 7. At sheet A6.0, the stair section reference is not correct. 8. At sheet A-1, detail reference marks 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14/A7 are not correct. 9. At detail 14/A7.5, the handrails are not code compliant. 10. Please provide a square footage summary of the facility as follows: a. Building 1st Level b. Building 2nd level Stor/Off/Mech c. Building 2nd Level enclosed Tower d. Total Building e. Exterior Patio f. Total Facility An out to out calculation revealed a total building square footage of 10,211.5. No where near the 8,762 provided on the cover sheet building code data summary. The patio calculated to 965.7 for a gross building summary of 11,177.2 square feet. 11. Once an accurate square footage has been determined, please recalculate the occupancy load and toilet fixture count. SHEET S-1 12. There is a Plus or minus 2'-0" grade retainage along the south wall. Reference grading plan and details 12 and 13 A7.4. Please provide details showing retainage. 13. Please provide structural details of the ramp. 14. Please provide structural details of the steps. CALCULATIONS AND ROOF FRAMING SHEET S-3 15. Calculations show B13 to be W12x43, drawings show W12x14. 16. Calculations show J2A to be KCS2, drawings show 12K1. 17. Calculations show no cals for J2B, drawings show it to be 12KCS2. 18. Provide steel stair calculations and details. 19. Please provide a framing key plan and calculations for the tower roof framing. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/01/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project:T10CM02853 150 W Wetmore Rd The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1.Per Submittal Requirements of the City of Tucson, designs of over 400 amps need to be sealed by an EE. 2.Provide Fault Current Calculations at the service and on through to the individual panels, and if levels are above 10,000aic at panels , indicate in panel description. 3. Provide a grounding detail for service showing, connection to rebar, any metallic water or gas lines, building if available. 4. Provide identification for equipment over current devices at MSB. 5. There appears to be only two -200 amp over current devices in MSB for the four panels ? 6. Describe IRH-1 on Sheet E-5. 7. Sheet E-5, the clearance in front of MSB on the mezzanene level does not comply with NEC 110.26.C.the required clearance for only having one entrance is required to be doubled in front of the MSB. This clearance should be from the most protruding section of the MSB across to the wall in front of it. Address each individually and indicate how each was resolved. Ray T Majuta PDSD, City of Tucson, Elect Plan CK, 11/03/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/02/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO GET CAPACITY EVALUATED & LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION APPROVED BY(PCRWRD) 3RD FLOOR OF THE PWB. 740-6534 NEED WW CREDIT EVALUATION- 5TH FLOOR PWB. 740-6606 BACK WATER VALVE MAY BE REQUIRED IF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION IS NOT 12" ABOVE FLOOD RIM OF CLOSEST UPSTREAM MANHOLE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/16/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |