Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02784
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: The alley is not wide enough for fire acces for the rear unit. Automatic fire sprinklers may be required in this or both units. See next comment and IFC 503. Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements. |
| 01/31/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | P&DS TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T10CM02784 2201 East 1st Street Two residential units TRANSMITTAL: January 31, 2011 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO). Provide three copies of the elevation plans and one copy of the floor plans for each structure. The elevation plans must be dimensioned. (See the application and instruction for the DDO process. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/2010_DDO_Setback.pdf ) The site is located in the R-2 zone (LUC Section 2.3.5.1). The Development Designator is "K" (LUC Sections 2.3.5.2.A.2 & 3.2.3.1.C). The Perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.C & 3.2.6.4). The minimum setback to the west property line is the greater of ten (10) feet or three-quarters (3/4) the height for each of the structure's walls facing that property line, measured from design grade to the highest point of each wall (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). The minimum setback for the wall measuring twenty-three (23) feet is seventeen (17) feet, three (3) inches to each interior property line for both structures (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). The proposed setback is five (5) feet to the west property line and twelve (12) feet to the east property line for the two story portion of the structure. The minimum setback for the single story portion of each structure is ten (10) feet to the east property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). The proposed setback is five (5) feet. |
| 02/04/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Peter Smith DATE: February 4, 2011 7524 N. Calle Sin Vacas Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: Granite House, V & VI, 2201 E. 1st Street Site plan T10CM02784 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. All responses to the review comments that read "Comment deferred pending approval of D.D.O. -will be addressed upon approval" are still valid review comments and will need to be satisfied prior to the next submittal. 3. The site plan cannot be approved prior to the approval and/or recording of all documents, easements, variances, DSMR's etc. Per previous comment. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. The property description shown on the plans does not match the legal description submitted with the SP. Also the legal description does not follow the accompanying exhibit and does not close establishing the lot or square footage. Perhaps the surveyor could be contacted about correcting the legal description. Per previous comment. 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. It is difficult to distinguish what lot lines have been established for this project. Perhaps changing the line weights would clear up confusion with the property lines. Per previous comment. 6. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. Call out the new conc. D/W apron and curb cut on the plans. 7. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. The alley cannot be used as a primary access point for the SFR. Also the alley must a min. width of 20' and paved to Wilson Ave if alley access is granted. The alley access problem must be addressed on the next submittal. Per previous comment. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Per previous comment. See comment no. 2. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Per previous comment. See comment no. 2. 10. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. Per previous comment. See comment no. 2. 11. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Per previous comment. See comment no. 2. 12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Show an area to store the garbage cans for curb side service. The area is still not shown on the site plan. Per previous comment. 13. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Show FFE on the plans. Per previous comment. See comment no. 2. 14. A grading permit may be required dependant upon the extent of the revisions and added information to the plans. Per previous comment. Drainage Statement: 1. The response to the review comments for the DS that reads "Comment deferred pending approval of D.D.O. -will be addressed upon approval" is still a valid review comment and will need to be satisfied prior to the next submittal. 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. Per previous comment. See comment no. 1. 3. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. Per previous comment. See comment no. 1. 4. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. Per previous comment. See comment no. 1. 5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. Per previous comment. See comment no. 1. 6. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. Per previous comment. See comment no. 1. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/2201 E. 1st St. Site 2 |
| 02/14/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements Screens, are to be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that the landscaping is visible from the street. Identify screening element on landscape plan 2. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. All walls required by this Division must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish. Wood Slat Fence does not meet screening requierments 3. The planting plan and layout calculations will include both the proper and common name of existing vegetation to remain in place. 4. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 5. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the DDO case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 6. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/16/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2011 | GBONILL1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/22/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts f. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0, Section 2.3 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |