Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM02747
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. |
| 10/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan, EF-4 so that all of the air supplied to the restroom will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 3. Provide structural details to show how the Type I hoods are to be supported from the building structure. Reference: Sections 302.1 and 507.6, IMC 2006. 4. Provide copies of sheets R1, R2, and R3. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 10/15/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1; SHEET NOTES (3) AND KEYNOTES (16.05): THESE NOTES REFERENCE SHEET N1 FOR INSECT CONTROL LEGEND AND NOTES. THESE WERE NOT FOUND ON N1. VERIFY. 2. SHEET A4; ROOF PLAN: THERE IS A CLOUDED AREA ON THE PLAN AT GRIDS 2 AND G. EXPLAIN. 3. SHEET A6.1; DETAIL 6: PROVIDE THE UPPER PORTION OF THIS DETAIL INDICATING HOW THE DIAGONAL BRACES CONNECT TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. CALL OUT SPECIFIC CONNECTORS AT THE TOP OF THE WALL AND AT THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 4. SHEET S4 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 20): THE DRAWING SCHEDULE INDICATES A COLUMN CIB (AT GRIDS J AND 2 AND GRIDS J AND 3), BUT THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHOW NO COLUMNS AT THESE TWO LOCATIONS. VERIFY. 5. SHEET S4 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 20): ON THE DRAWINGS, THE COLUMN AT GRIDS K AND 2 (C4) INDICATES A 3/4" THICK BASE PLATE, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 7/8" THICK BASE PLATE. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET S4 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 20): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A HSS8X8X3/16 COLUMN AT GRIDS L AND 2, WHILE THE DRAWINGS SHOW NO COLUMN AT THAT LOCATION. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S4 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 20): IT APPEARS THERE ARE COORDINATION ISSUES WITH THE COLUMN TABLE IN THE CALCULATIONS AND THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON THE DRAWINGS. REVIEW AND VERIFY. 8. SHEET S4 (FOUNDATION SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 31): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 3'-6"X3'-6"X1'-0" FOOTING AT GRIDS C AND 2, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A 5'-6"X5'-6"X1'-4" FOOTING. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S4 (FOUNDATION SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 31): THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A COLUMN FOOTING AT GRIDS J AND 2 AND GRIDS J AND 3, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS SHOW NO FOOTING AT THOSE LOCATIONS. CLARIFY. 10. SHEET S4 (FOUNDATION SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 31): IT APPEARS THERE ARE COORDINATION ISSUES WITH THE FOUNDATION SCHEDULE TABLE IN THE CALCULATIONS AND THE FOUNDATION SCHEDULE ON THE DRAWINGS. REVIEW AND VERIFY. 11. SHEET S4.1 (JOIST SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE JOISTS J7B AND J7C TO BE 16KSP JOISTS, WHILE THE DRAWING SCHEDULE INDICATES 30KSP. CLARIFY. 12. SHEET S4.1 (JOIST SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A JOIST J7E, BUT THE DRAWING SCHEDULE SHOWS NO JOIST J7E. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET S4.1 (JOIST SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A JOIST J8B, BUT THE DRAWING SCHEDULE SHOWS NO JOIST J8B. CLARIFY. 14. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED FOR REVIEW IN WRITING BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/18/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/18/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 10/21/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/22/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM02747 New Walmart,Retail 2711 S Houghton RD The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following: 1.Sheet E2.3, the electrical room requires panic hardware or equivalent on the doors as per 2005 NEC 126.C.2, for electrical rooms containing equipment rated over 1200 amps. Show compliance with this section on this sheet. 2.Sheet E2.3, Circuits MSB3-2,4,15 should be Circuits MSB4-2,4,15. 3. Provide 2006 IECC Interior Lighting Budget Calculations, reviewed Exterior Lighting Budget Calculations, could not locate Interior. 4.Concerning Panels DTA and DTB, I assume these are pre-wired Listed and Approved units. Would you provide information concerning these. Are Panelboards CHA1 and Cha2 along with CHBand CHB2 also a part of the listed Unit ? Who will be responsible for the wiring from the refrigeration equipment back to these panels? What will representatives from the Manufacture be responsible for and what will the electricial contractor be responsible for? 5.The electrical permit for this project once issued will not include the Fire Pump Service, Fire Pump or associated equipment. There are no electrical drawings for this included. Ray T Majuta,PDSD,City of Tucson, Elect Plan Ck, 10/25/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/26/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TI EXTEND PUBLIC SEWER BY SUBMITTING A REVIEW FOR LARGE LINE TAP PERMIT (12" OR LARGER) OR MANHOLE TAP CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FROM WASTEWATER (PCRWRD) ON 1ST FLOOR PWB 201 N STONE-740-6369. (IF STARTED PLEASE PROVIDE G#) NEED TO GET CAPACITY EVALUATED BY (PCRWRD DEVELOPMENT 3RD FLOOR PWB- 740-6534 NEED REVIEW/APPROVAL OF GREASE INTERSEPTOR BY IWC- TOM TOMCHAK - 443-6200 5025 W INA RD. APPROVED COT DEV PLAN D09-0014 NEED REVIEW/APPROVAL BY PDEQ 7TH FLOOR 33 N STONE AV #700- 243-7400 NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE THE TOTAL OF ALL FIXTURES CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC SEWER WITH TRAP ARM SIZES. (NO FIXTURES WERE COUNTED THIS REVIEW) |
| 10/26/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/04/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |