Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02703
Parcel: 140410230

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T10CM02703
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/30/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

1.The assembly room and office above the tape room have greater than 40 occupants. Per 2006 IFC, table 1019.2, maximum occupant load would be 30. A second exit is required.

2. Does the current sprinkler system have the required density for the rack storage?
10/01/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET T1.0 (CODE REVIEW CHECKLIST); SHEET A0.0 (EGRESS CALCULATION): THIS BUILDING IS LISTED AS AN S-1 OCCUPANCY GROUP ON SHEET T1.0, BUT AS AN F-1 ON SHEET A0.0. THIS APPEARS TO BE A FACTORY WITH MIXED OCCUPANCIES (PER IBC SECTION 508). VERIFY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS MEET IBC SECTION 508.3 REQUIREMENTS.
2. SHEET T1.0; PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATION: THE REQUIRED LAVATORIES AND WATER CLOSETS APPEAR TO BE BASED ON THE OFFICE OCCUPANCY ONLY, WHILE THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE BASED ON THE TOTAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY. REVISE TO INCLUDE THE TOTAL BUILDING OCCUPANT LOAD.
3. SHEET D1.0; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 2 AND GRIDS L AND M, THERE IS A NOTE 5 INDICATED WHERE NO WALL IS SHOWN. CLARIFY.
4. SHEETS A2.0 AND A2.1; FLOOR PLANS 1 AND 2: THE STORAGE RACKS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT. VERIFY.
5. SHEETS A2.0 AND A2.1; FLOOR PLANS 1 AND 2: ARE THERE ANY NEW HAZARDOUS TYPE MATERIALS BEING ADDED IN THIS BUILDING (TAPE ROOM)? VERIFY.
6. SHEET A2.1 (FLOOR PLAN 2); FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: REVISE THREE LOCATIONS (NORTH OF GRID M) WHERE NOTE 48 POINTS TO MASONRY SCREEN WALLS (NOTE 47). VERIFY.
7. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN 2: PER IBC SECTION 1014.2(3), AN EXIT ACCESS CAN NOT PASS THROUGH A ROOM THAT CAN BE LOCKED. IN RECEPTION ROOM 8, THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES A LOCKSET LS1 (SHEET A3.0). REVISE.
8. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN 2: BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 3 AND SOUTH OF GRID M, THE EXIT CORRIDOR MUST MEET THE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1017. VERIFY.
9. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN 2: PER IBC SECTION 1014.2(3), AN EXIT ACCESS CAN NOT PASS THROUGH A ROOM THAT CAN BE LOCKED. IN DESIGN OFFICE ROOM 29, THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES A LOCKSET LS1 (SHEET A3.0). REVISE.
10. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN 2: PER IBC SECTION 1017.3(2), EXIT ACCESS SHALL BE ARRANGED SUCH THAT THERE ARE NO DEAD END CORRIDORS GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH. IN THE NEW OFFICE ADDITION BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 4 (FROM THE BREAK ROOM 7 TO THE DESIGN OFFICE 29), THERE IS A DEAD END CORRIDOR CREATED BY THE LOCKING DOOR OF THE DESIGN OFFICE THAT EXCEEDS 50 FEET. VERIFY.
11. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN 2 (NOTES 35 AND 36): PROVIDE LINTEL SIZES AND DETAILS FOR THE NEW OPENINGS IN THE EXISTING WALL.
12. SHEET A2.4; SECOND FLOOR PLAN 5: PROVIDE ON THE DRAWING DIMENSIONS VERIFYING THAT IBC SECTION 505.3 REQUIREMENT (EGRESS TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A MEZZANINE) IS MET.
13. SHEET A4.0; RESTROOM PLAN 1: AT THE URINAL, PROVIDE A CLEAR DIMENSION BETWEEN PARTITIONS THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIGURE 305.7 IN THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003.
14. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATIONS: NOTE 1 INDICATES 1500 PSF SOIL BEARING WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOOTING OF 12". REVISE PER THE CITY OF TUCSON AMENDMENTS SECTION 1805.2, WHICH REQUIRES AN 18" FOOTING DEPTH FOR 1500 PSF SOIL BEARING.
15. SHEET S1.0; HEADED STUDS: IS THIS SECTION PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY.
16. SHEETS S2.0, S2.1, AND S2.3; PLANS: REVISE THE EAST-WEST GRIDS TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (GRID N). VERIFY.
17. SHEET S2.2 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 45): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN C5 HAS A BASE PLATE SIZE OF 14"X10"X1-1/2", WHILE THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.2 (FOR C4) INDICATES A BASE PLATE SIZE OF 3/4"X10"X0'-10". CLARIFY.
18. SHEET S2.2; SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: THE DETAIL REFERENCE 202 ON GRID 1 SHOULD BE REVISED TO 201. VERIFY.
19. SHEET S2.2; SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: ADD THE DETAIL REFERENCE ON GRID B (CUT THROUGH W18X50 BEAM). VERIFY.
20. SHEET S2.2; SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: THE DETAIL REFERENCE 205 SIM AT THE STEEL BEAM TO BEAM CONNECTION SHOULD BE REVISED TO 215. VERIFY.
21. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 103: IN THE FOOTING, IS THERE A #4 INDICATED IN THE TOP OF THE FOOTING. CLARIFY.
22. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 30: DID NOT LOCATE CALCULATIONS FOR J4. VERIFY.
23. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS CAN BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/04/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied A new 2" water meter is noted on sheet P2.1. Revise the site utility plan to show the location of the new water meter as well as the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings, specify the reduced pressure backflow assembly being installed, and indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: COT Backflow Prevention Ordinance, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
10/04/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. Additional comments may be applicable once the controlling code is selected.
2. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures. All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, UPC, etc).
3. Define the possible waste stream that will be introduced into the trench drains.
4. Provide a design for the dry well noted on sheets P1.1 and P2.1.
5. Equipment to be directly connected to the water supply system that does not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection.
10/04/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
2. Clarify the termination points of the secondary condensate drains from the fan coils. Reference: Section 307.2.3, IMC 2006.
3. Provide sufficient heat for the manufacturing and office areas to maintain a minimum temperature of 68 F on a design heating day (32 F). Reference: Section 309.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006.
5. Clarify the purpose of exhaust fan EF-1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
6. The occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities and combined outdoor air rates are used.
7. Revise the ventilation calculations to take into account the different occupancy loads in the project space (e.g. office, conference room gym, etc.). Reference: Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2006.
10/05/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
10/05/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T101CM02703
6874 S Palo Verde
TI Simply One

The electrical plans have been denied for the following:

1. Since the SES 2 section is being modified, it will require re-certification by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory, please indicate this on plan as a note.
2. The equipment grd for the feeders from the SES-2 to the 1000a Disconnect should be #2 cu, per 2005 NEC 250.66.
3. The equipment grd from the 1000a disconnect to the Fire Pump controller are also to small.
4. Provide information on the Fire Pump , Fire Controller and Jocky pump in the form of cut sheets.
5. Verify compliance with 695.3.A.1, on the connection of the Fire Pump conductors in the SES -2.
6. Provide notation on plan that the Fire Pump Disconnect to be identified per 695.4.B.3.
7. Provide the fault current at the Fire Pump Controller and provide the fault current the equipment is rated for.
8. The fault current for Panel HED is listed to be 41,891 aic, the listing on the panel is 10,000aic.
9. Show fault current calculations for all panels.
10. The feeders for the Fire Pump equipment do not comply with 230.70.A.1, nor 230.6.
11. Please notate on plan that the installation of the Fire Pump and Equipment shall comply with NFPA-20.


Ray T Majuta,PDSD,
City of Tuc, Elect Pln Ck,
10/6/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
10/19/2010 CAGUILA1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review