Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02700
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/27/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Clements Senior Center T10CM02700 Site Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 27, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the area of expansion only. 2. This comment has not been addressed. Provide documentation that the lot combo has been approved and if approved remove the parcel line from the site plan. As the propose building is going to be built across a lot line, parcels 136-29-0010 & 136-29-003A. A lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approve Pima County Combination Request Form and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property prior to approval of the site plan. 3. Once the above comments have been addressed I am willing to provide an over-the-counter review for the site plan and building plan. Please call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02700 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 10/04/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved. Revise the site utility drawing (C2.01) to include the location of the backflow preventer for the public water system. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D, COT Backflow Prevention Ordinance, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 10/11/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Steven R. Davenport, Architect DATE: October 20, 2011 410 N. 44th St., Ste. 800 FROM: Paul Machado Phoenix, Arizona, 85008 Engineering Division Subject: Clements Senior Center, 8155 E. Poinciana Dr. Site plan T10CM02700 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 33 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. It is unclear as to how the top of bank was established in order to obtain the 50' resource area. It appears that the top of bank does not follow any contour lines and is shown as a straight line. Re-map the 10-year event or the top of bank to properly show the conditions. 3. If the floodplain is being encroached upon, the building pad should have protection ie: rip-rap slope protection ect. 4. Provide a smaller scale of the entire parcel showing the property lines, all improvements, the limits of the 100-yr. flood plain, EHS etc. The smaller scale site should be able to be read as well as show what is being constructed. Perhaps a scale between the previous and latest submittal would work. 5. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. A mitigation plan is required for any disturbance in the resource area. Also see NPPO comments. As discussed the mitigation area is measured from the limits of the 10-year event if the banks of the wash are not well defined. It appears that the limits shown do not accurately depict the 10-year event. When the 10-year event is shown, then it can be said that no construction in the resource area is taken place. 6. Show Site plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. Shall be shown on each sheet. The current site plan no. (T10CM02700) is to be shown on the plans. Per previous comment. 7. If improvements are proposed within the floodplain limits, why isn't there any bank or slope protection shown for the pad? Show all methods of scour protection on the plans. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. A mitigation plan is required for any disturbance in the resource area. Also see NPPO comments. As discussed the mitigation area is measured from the limits of the 10-year event if the banks of the wash are not well defined. It appears that the limits shown do not accurately depict the 10-year event. When the 10-year event is shown, then it can be said that no construction in the resource area is taken place. 3. Show or complete the floodplain limits on all plan sheets. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8155 E. Poinciana Dr. Site 4 |
| 10/14/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPP plan per LUC 3.8 & DS 2-15 or provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per per DS 2-15.2.0.C. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/14/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond |