Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02700
Parcel: 13629003A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T10CM02700
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/29/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Detail for No Parking-Fire Lane sign incorrect. Please refer to C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 IFC, appendix D.
09/30/2010 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide one accessible passenger zone in the passenger loading zone area as per 2006 IBC, section 1106.7 and 2010 ADAAG, Section 503.
2. At Detail 8/A8.3: Change the 6'8" dimension to 7'-0" as per detail 6/A-3.
3. The curb area in front of the accessible parking is show differently between sheet C0.50 and A1.2. Is the curb to be a wide curb or a planter strip? Please clearify.
4. On sheet A1.2 Parking Calculations Site Plan, please identify your accessible parking spaces and aisles.
END OF REVIEW
09/30/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Passed This is a COT owned project, reference ADA comments
10/04/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Clements Senior Center
T10CM02700
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 5, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the area of expansion only.

2. As lot lines were not provided on the site plan it appears that the propose building is going to be built across a lot line, parcels 136-29-0010 & 136-29-003A. A lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approve Pima County Combination Request Form and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property prior to approval of the site plan.

3. This review is based on sheets A1.1 & A1.2.

4. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with your next submittal..

5. Provide a site plan that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-02.0.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a property description, legal description, on the site plan.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D on the site plan.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Show the lot lines and provide lot dimensions and bearings on the site plan.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of the proposed structure on the site plan.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a fully dimensioned Off-street parking layout. Provide a typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a detail for off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Ensure the detail meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09.0.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide dimension for all parking area access lane (PAALs) and service roads on the site plan.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of D.S. 2-08.3.1 are met.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 The loading space shown on sheet A1.1, called out under Keynote 14 does not meet the size requirements for a fitness center. Per LUC Section 3..4.5 Recreation Use Group and LUC 3.4.5.3 the minimum size is 12 x 35.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 Show the required maneuvering area on the site plan for the loading space.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 Per LUC Section 3.4.4.1.B.2 an additional 12.x 35 loading space is required for the proposed Senior Center.

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable graphically show all easements of record on the site plan along with the recordation information, Docket and page.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the site plan. The proposed use should be listed as "NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION "6", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.13.2 AND SEC. 3.5.13.3"

19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 Show the refuse container locations on the plan.

Per D.S. 2-02.2.2.B When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide the following calculations for the entire site.

20. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 Provide the gross lot area on the site plan.

21. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Provide the floor area for all buildings on the site plan.

22. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Per Development Designator "6" provide the allowed and proposed lot coverage on the site plan.

23. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Per Development Designator "6" provide the allowed and proposed floor area ration (FAR) on the site plan.

24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Based on a proposed use of "NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION" the proposed vehicle parking calculation is not correct. Unless each use shown on sheet A1.2 under "NEW SENIOR CENTER PARKING REQUIREMENTS" will have a separate use with a separate certificate of occupancy you cannot break out each use as shown. Also the reference to Clements Center Phase II as the last approved site plan is not correct. There have been other plans approved which include the new ball fields that need to be included in the vehicle and bicycle parking calculation.

25. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Provide a loading space calculation that provides the required and proposed on the site plan.

26. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building and vehicular use area expansion calculation on the plan.
27. Depending on how all comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t10cm02700

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan.
10/07/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site utility drawing (C2.01) to include the following information:
a. the size of the water meter
b. the location of the backflow preventer for the public water system.
c. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer
d. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes
e. the first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D.
2. Correct the notes for the water service for the southeast corner of the building; the drawing shows the water meter having 4" plugged sewer lines for the pipes entering and leaving the meter. Also, key note #26 is missing.
10/15/2010 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Steven R. Davenport, Architect,DATE: October 21, 2010
410 N. 44th St., Ste. 800
Phoenix, Arizona, 85008

Subject: Clements Senior Center, 8155 E. Poinciana Dr.
Site plan T10CM02700 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 33

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Hydrology Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, to be a minimum of 3/32 inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving per DS 2-01.
3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
4. Provide a Civil Site plan in the plan set or re-label one of the other site plans (i.e. grading and paving) as the civil "SITE PLAN". However if a plan is re-named the "SITE PLAN", the basic information shown on a site plan will still be required per D.S. 2-02.2.1, SITE PLAN CONTENT AND SPECIFICATIONS. The improvement plans (grading and paving) if included in the submittal can be reviewed in conjunction with Site Plan submittal.
5. Provide a smaller scale of the entire parcel showing the property lines, all improvements, the limits of the 100-yr. flood plain, EHS etc.
6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5.
7. "A Floodplain Use Permit (FUP) will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to the approval of the Site Plan. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature, extent of revisions and comments that occur to the plans".
8. The unnamed wash NE of the project is labeled as a proposed W.A.S.H. wash on the Tucson Department of Transportation maps. The W.A.S.H. ordinance regulations will apply for this wash. Contact Patricia Gehlen for information on submittal requirements and procedures at (520) 837-4919.
9. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. A mitigation plan is required for any disturbance in the resource area. Include the mitigation plan with the grading plan submittal.
10. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
11. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
12. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
13. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
14. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
15. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Provide either individual or blankets easements for all future and existing utilities. The easements shall be labeled with the recording information prior to the approval of the site plan.
16. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP.
17. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. Label or show the top of the banks.
18. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
19. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
20. Show Site plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
21. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
22. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
23. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
24. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice.
25. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
26. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 2 sets of the grading plan and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements…..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2.
3. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
4. For all commercial or industrial developments larger than one acre in size shall provide 5-year threshold retention per the Stormwater Det./Ret. Manual, Chapter II, 2.2.
5. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.
6. The unnamed wash NE of the project is labeled as a proposed W.A.S.H. wash on the Tucson Department of Transportation maps. The W.A.S.H. ordinance regulations will apply for this wash. Contact Patricia Gehlen for information on submittal requirements and procedures at (520) 837-4919.
7. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. A mitigation plan is required for any disturbance in the resource area. Include the mitigation plan with the grading plan submittal.
8. Per the City of Tucson Code of Ordinances, Chapter 26, Floodplain, Stormwater and Erosion Hazard Management, Section 26-5.1 - Floodway development. Development in the floodway shall:
" (13) Not contribute to debris accumulation upstream and/or downstream.
" (14) Not create a water pollution problem in the floodway due to soluble, insoluble, or solid materials, at the time of flooding.
9. Per the City of Tucson Code of Ordinances, Chapter 26, Floodplain, Stormwater and Erosion Hazard Management, Section 26-5.2 - Floodway fringe development: No development, storage of materials or equipment, or other uses shall be permitted which, acting alone or in combination with existing or future uses, create a danger or hazard to life or property. Development in the floodway fringe shall:
" (13) Prohibit storage and/or processing of materials that are buoyant, flammable, explosives or that could be injurious to human, animal or plant life at the time of flooding.
" (15) Locate water supply, water treatment and sewage collection and disposal systems to eliminate or minimize infiltration of floodwaters into these systems and discharge of materials from these systems into floodwaters.
10. Show the project address or administration address and the City of Tucson SP activity number on the cover sheet of the DR.
11. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain, erosion hazard setback line and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. The E.H.S. is measured from the top of bank or the 100-yr WSEL per S.M.D.D.F.M., Chap VII, 7.4.
12. Additional comments may be necessary depending on the content and information contained in the DR.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/8155 E. Poinciana Dr. Site
10/26/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
10/26/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/22/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/22/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed