Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T10CM02603
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/20/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/21/2010 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET L1.3 1. Provide a continous 3' deep detectable warning strip along the portion of the pedestrian way that is adjacent to the PAAL on the East side of the road as per ADAAG, Section 4.29.5 2. Provide a 3' deep detectable warning strip at the East side of the marked crossing and at the accessible parking aisle as per ADAAG 4.29.5. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/21/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T10CM02603 Sentinel Peak Park 1501 W. Sentinel Peak Road Pedestrian Paths, H.C. Parking, Three Ramada structures TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. It is not clear whether there is an approved site plan for Sentinel Peak Park. With this in mind I am requesting the following information to be added to sheet L-1 so that future development or phases can be related back to this overall site plan. Add the following items to G02 sheet and the site plan sheet L-1. List the development criteria as follows on sheet G02: Add the legal description, Add the lot Area required and actual (Total Sentinel Park Area is 273 acres) Add the zoning of the property (R-1), Add the use of the property, Neighborhood Recreation - Regional Nature Resource Park DD 12 Subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.13.2 and 3.5.13.3 Add the number of parking spaces provided on the top parking lot Add the allowed proposed Lot coverage Add the allowed and proposed Floor Area Ratio Add the allowed and proposed building height Call me if you have any questions about comment one (1). 2. As I indicated to Chelsea, the development standards does not allow for the use of stabilized DG for pedestrian access or accessible routes, however I have discussed the potential use of this material with the Zoning Administrator. He has put together a meeting with staff that is involved in the review process, ADA review staff, EEOC and Administration to discuss the applicability and compliance if allowed as an alternative method whether as an approved method or as alternative to concrete in certain situations. This meeting will be held on Monday the 27th and I expect to have preliminary info by the Monday afternoon. This comment will remain until a decision is made by the Zoning Administrator or PDSD Director. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T10CM02603.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/01/2010 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: October 1, 2010 TO: Chelsea Marshall L.A., Wheat Scharf Assoc. SUBJECT: Sentinel Peak Regional Natural Resource Park improvements LOCATION: 1501 W SENTINEL PEAK RD, T14S R13E Secs14 & 15, Ward 1 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE ACTIVITIES: T10CM02603 (site plan), T10BU01448 (grading plan) FLOODPLAIN: Balanced Basin Management Plan, FIRM 2855K SUMMARY: The subject property and proposed phased improvements include ramada structures, removal of some existing park features, pedestrian drop-off area, shaded rest areas, check dams and micro basins, and other park features to accommodate for the proposed Sentinel Peak Regional Natural Resource Park. Engineering Division of the City of Tucson Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submittal package and recommends conditional approval. SITE/GRADING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL: 1) DS Sec.11-01: Address the following comments on next submittal: a) Designate construction/stockpile/staging areas on grading sheet plan views. Or, at minimum, add a note stating that staging areas will be designated prior to commencement of construction and shall not exceed X square feet. (X is the amount of area that, when added to the disturbance area of phase 1 improvements, the total does not exceed one acre, otherwise a SWPPP would be required). b) Provide total disturbance area in square feet on cover sheet or grading plan sheet for each phase (at minimum provide phase 1 data). Assure the disturbance areas used for construction/stockpile/staging are included in total disturbance area. c) Any proposed slopes that exceed 2:1(H:V) grades can not be accepted without a geotechnical report. Revise details or provide a copy of a geotechnical statement with project recommendations including slope stabilization recommendations. d) On detail 1 on sheet L1.5, address the following: i) Label existing grade line on uphill side of detail, unless this line is something else - clarify. ii) Dimension minimum depth of interceptor side swale. e) Correct check dam detail on sheet L1.5. Contour lines need to be perpendicularly drawn; contour lines need to be parallel to check dam length. A note may need to be added clarifying that the check dams are to be placed within existing small rivulets where stormwater collection for natural looking water harvesting can be accomplished. f) Resin stabilized DG path detail and signage appears acceptable for Mission View Trail. Add note to grading plan sheet on the sheet L1.2 that as-builts for this section of the improvements will be submitted after this trail is completed to assure no more than 5% slopes are constructed. 2) Update grading permit application activity number T10BU01448 on the sheet L1.2. Submit 2 copies of the plans, one copy of geotechnical statement if applicable, and response letter. Once all items above have been addressed Engineering can stamp the plans for approval. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions or if you would like to set up a meeting to go over comments or resubmittal. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 10/05/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | This site is subject to the following Overlay Zone Vegetation Retention criteria: CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-01.0 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENT Add the following notes to site plan (Including heading): A. Vegetation Retention. 1. Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. 2. When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring re-vegetation, whenever possible. B. Re-vegetation. All cut or fill slopes, which are no steeper than three (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be re-vegetated in compliance with the following requirements. 1. All plants used in re-vegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing. 2. Re-vegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants. a. Native trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading. b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting or any other method approved by the Zoning Review Section at DSD. 1) Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; 2) Hydro-seeding; 3) Anchored mulches; or 4) Established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. C. A temporary watering system must be installed until the re-vegetation materials is established. D. NPPO pre permit inspection is required prior to grading inspection can be scheduled by calling IVR system and entering inspection code 09015 or calling Landscape Field Representative directly @ 837-4950 E. Grubbing, grading, and clearing are to occur only within the areas identified on the grading plan and staked on the site or lot. The limits should include all cut and fill areas, leach fields, septic tanks and future development areas identified F. The portions of the site or lot to be left ungraded are to remain undisturbed and are not to be used for stockpiling of materials or excess fill, construction vehicle access, storage of vehicles during construction, or similar uses. G. Development other than hiking trails will not be permitted within the legally described boundaries of the natural area. |
| 10/06/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | This site is subject to the following Overlay Zone Vegetation Retention criteria: CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-01.0 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENT Add the following notes to site plan (Including heading): A. Vegetation Retention. 1. Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. 2. When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring re-vegetation, whenever possible. B. Re-vegetation. All cut or fill slopes, which are no steeper than three (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be re-vegetated in compliance with the following requirements. 1. All plants used in re-vegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing. 2. Re-vegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants. a. Native trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading. b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting or any other method approved by the Zoning Review Section at DSD. 1) Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; 2) Hydro-seeding; 3) Anchored mulches; or 4) Established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. C. A temporary watering system must be installed until the re-vegetation materials is established. D. NPPO pre permit inspection is required prior to grading inspection can be scheduled by calling IVR system and entering inspection code 09015 or calling Landscape Field Representative directly @ 837-4950 E. Grubbing, grading, and clearing are to occur only within the areas identified on the grading plan and staked on the site or lot. The limits should include all cut and fill areas, leach fields, septic tanks and future development areas identified F. The portions of the site or lot to be left ungraded are to remain undisturbed and are not to be used for stockpiling of materials or excess fill, construction vehicle access, storage of vehicles during construction, or similar uses. G. Development other than hiking trails will not be permitted within the legally described boundaries of the natural area. |
| 10/07/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | No plumbing. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |