Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM02528
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/14/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/15/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A1.0 1. This project is governed by the 2006 IBC. All accessibility requirements are as per Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1) as stated in your Code Summary on Sheet CS-1. a. Please delete all referenceS to ADA at all accessibility details and reference ICC (ANSI 117.1). 2. Please provide large scale toilet room plans showing all accessibility compliance; clearances and dimensions for all fixtures and accessories. a. Generic, code duplicated details are not acceptable. 3. Show all accessibility compliance on the interior toilet elevations; accessories and dimensions. 4. Please provide a drinking fountain as per Section 1105.9 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 602. 5. Please provide a mop sinks as per Table 2902.1. 6. Key notes make several references to new material. Isn't this a new building? 7. Where do the underground roof drains go to? It is not clear on any of the Civil drawings. 8. Overflow drain is not shown on the roof plan but is note referenced to detail 12. Detail 12 where? STRUCTURAL REVIEW 9. Please provide Special Inspection Certifications for review and approval. 10. Please provide complete structural calculations for all concrete foundations and footings. a. As per the note on page 1-1 in the structural calculations, no geotechnical evaluation and report was provided for foundation design. Please design all foundations as per reccommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Foree&Vann, Inc., dated 5 March 2010 that was submitted with the permit documents. 11. Structural calculation evaluations shown for the SIPS is not sufficient. Please provide a complete manufacturer's product literature along with structural calculations for all conditions. a. If the SIPS is to be a deferred submittal, please provide another letter to the building official for additional fee assessment. 12. Please provide structural calculations for the suspended heat pump. 13. Please show north arrow on all floor plans and any partial floor plans. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/15/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 09/15/2010 | RONALD BROWN | HC | REVIEW | Denied | Reference Building Folder for Comments |
| 09/17/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Tucson Water limits a 1-1/2" meter to a maximum demand of 50 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1-1/2" water meter will be allowed for this project. Reference: Sections 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006. |
| 09/20/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. 2. The maximum flow rates for plumbing fixtures have been set by the State of Arizona, not the City of Tucson. See ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12. (http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp). 3. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 4. The minimum residual water pressure is 15 PSI unless it can be shown that no specified fixtures or appliances require minimum residual pressures greater than 8 PSI. Note that some water closets and some appliances (e.g. dishwashers and clothes washers) require minimum residual pressures greater than 15 PSI. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 5. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006. A cleanout is required at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer per Section 719.1, UPC 2006 but the building sewer in this case is 4" which will require a minimum cleanout size of 3-1/2", not 3" as shown. A 2-way cleanout is not required at this location because there is an upper terminal cleanout provided (see Section 707.4 (exception 4), UPC 2006). 6. The maximum length of the horizontal portion of a 2" vent is 40-feet unless the vent has been oversized by one pipe diameter for its entire length. 7. Specify the precise method to be used to sterilize the PEX water distribution system that meets the requirements of the PEX manufacturer. The UPC provides two methods of sterilization and one of them may be harmful to the PEX. Reference: Sections 310.4 and 609.9, UPC 2006. 8. The pipe sizing chart, shown on sheet P-2, is supposed to be based on a friction factor of 7.2 PSI per 100 feet of pipe. If it is designed for sizing the aboveground piping (PEX), the stated upper limits for each tubing size are incorrect. All of the friction factors are in excess of 12.5 PSI per 100 feet and the tubing sizes of 1" and greater have velocities much greater than 8 FPS. Revise the chart as required to required to limit the pressure drops to the calculated values and the velocities to 8 feet per second or less. 9. Sheet P1 indicates that a backwater valve is required for this building; show the installation of the backwater valve. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area. 10. Clarify how an air gap fitting will be employed for terminating the HVAC condensate drain. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 807.2, UPC 2006. 11. Provide sizes and materials for the roof drains, overflow drains, and the rainwater leaders. Show the termination points for roof drains and the overflow drains. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 1101.11, and 1105.1 UPC 2006. 12. Revise detail 12/A-13.1 to include a strainer for the overflow drain. Reference: Section 1105.2, UPC 2006. |
| 09/24/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project, not the International Residential Code. 2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for this building. Reference: Section 501.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2006 (Chapter 4 of the 2006 IECC applies only to residential buildings). 3. Show that condensation will not form on the surface of any duct. Reference: Section 603.12, IMC 2006. 4. Provide duct insulation per Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006. 5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006. 6. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 7. Show how the supply air volumes are to be adjusted during system balancing. Reference: Section 603.17, IMC 2006. 8. Clarify the termination of the condensate drain as described in key note #1; to which point will it be terminating? 9. The break room shows the installation of a range. Provide a Type I grease hood and make-up air system. Reference: Section 507.2.3, IMC 2006. |
| 09/30/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project:T10CM02528 Ghost Ranch Lodge, Office/Clubhouse The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. Sheet E.2,1, does the calculation for The Outdoor Lighting Code Ord 10135, include all the lights on these permits for Bldg's 1 thur 12 ? How were the figures for 134700 lumens for fully shielded, and 41640 lumens for unshielded obtained ? Please show the caculation. 2. Sheet E3.1, Circuit HP1-13 is on the panel schedule not on the lighting plan. 3. Sheet E3.1, Circuit LP-1, 4 is in the panel schedule not on the plan. 4. These set of plans have two Sheets of E9.0, however they are both different . 5. The Mechanical Plans Examiner has indicated that in the Office/Clubhouse Building in the restrooms the supplied air has to be exhausted by the same amount, how will this be achieved electrically ? 6. Both A and B type Units show a roof top and an indoor unit for heating and cooling. How will they both be wired of same circuit ? Does the feed to the outdoor unit feed the indoor unit ? How will the disconnect for the indoor unit be accessible ? 7. Bldg 10, the second Sheet E9.0 should have the SES for Building 10 for 6 units, it appears to be missing. 8. The 800 SES for Building 12 shows 3 sets of 4--4/0 Al feeding it being good for 540 amps in the 75 degree C (2205 NEC) table. The load calculations show a total of 602 amps on B phase on Sheet E11.2 ? Ray T Majuta,PDSD, City of Tucson, Elect Plan Ck,10/3/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/05/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |