Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM02294
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/23/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
08/23/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
08/26/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
08/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
08/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
08/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
09/01/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS-1: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT PER CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS. REVISE 'ABBREVIATIONS', 'DRAWING SYMBOLS', AND 'GENERAL NOTES'. 2. SHEET A-1.0; DEMO PLAN: NOTE 5 OF THE DEMOLITION KEYNOTES WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 3. SHEET S5.1; BEAM SCHEDULE: THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT BEAMS DESIGNATED AS 5. REVISE. 4. SHEET S5.1 (LOWER PLAN); SHEET SD3 (DETAIL 11): DETAIL 11 CUT ON EACH END OF THE BUILDING SHOULD BE NOTED AS SIMILAR (CANTILEVERS OVER WALL). VERIFY. 5. SHEET S5.1; LOWER PLAN: REVISE THE PLAN TITLE. 6. SHEET S5.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET SD3 (DETAIL 20): A DETAIL 20 REFERENCE WAS NOT FOUND ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET SD3; DETAIL 18: INDICATE THAT THE FOOTING IS 2'-6" SQUARE. VERIFY. 8. SHEET SD3: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT PER CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS. 9. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
09/01/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
09/01/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Remove any reference related to any specifc types of window replacements or add the information in order to review and approve the requirements for Historic purposes. Please revise the plans as discussed per our phone conversation. Zoning will review and approve the plans after the changes have been made and re-submitted of the plans for review. This comment is applicable to all permits with the same building design. |
09/01/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
09/02/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
09/02/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |