Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02241
Parcel: 11704301A

Address:
534 N 4TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: OTHER

Permit Number - T10CM02241
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/17/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
11/24/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET S3; S1 FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE ON THE NOTE THE R PANEL GAUGE.
2. SHEET S4; DETAIL 01: PROVIDE AN ENLARGED DETAIL FOR THE BEAM TO COLUMN CONNECTION, INCLUDING STIFFENER PLATES, CONNECTION WELD PLATES, AND WELDS REQUIRED.
3. SHEET S4; DETAIL 02: PROVIDE STIFFENER PLATES, CONNECTION WELD PLATES, AND WELDS REQUIRED TO THE ENLARGED DETAIL PER THE CALCULATIONS.
4. SHEET S4; SECTION 03: ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SECTION, THERE IS A NOTE FOR TUBE STEEL RAFTERS OR DOUBLE STEEL CHANNELS. REVISE THIS NOTE.
5. SHEET S5: ARE ALL OF THESE DETAILS PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? REMOVE DETAILS AS REQUIRED.
6. SHEET S6; DETAIL O1: ADD A NOTE FOR THE CAISSON TIES AND SPACING.
7. SHEET S6 (DETAIL 02); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 16): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 7-#6 TOP AND BOTTOM (TRANSVERSE) WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES 6-#6 TOP AND 8-#6 BOTTOM. COORDINATE.
8. SHEET S6 (DETAIL 03); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 12): DETAIL 03 INDICATES A 3/4X5X10 STEEL PLATE EACH SIDE, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 3/4X6X10 STEEL PLATE EACH SIDE. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S6 (DETAIL 03); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 12): DETAIL 03 INDICATES A 3/16 SHOP WELD ON 2 SIDES OF THE PLATE, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 5/16 WELD ALL AROUND THE PLATE. REVISE THE DETAIL WELD TO MATCH THE CALCULATIONS.
10. SHEET 6 (DETAIL 03); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 12): DETAIL 03 DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE INFORMATION FOR THE BEAM TO COLUMN CONNECTION. PROVIDE DETAILING ON THE DRAWINGS PER SHEET 12 OF THE CALCULATIONS.
11. SHEET S6; DETAIL 05: WHERE ARE THE LOWER SAG RODS LOCATED? PROVIDE NOTE.
12. SHEET S7 (DETAIL 01); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 19): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 3'-0" DIAMETER CAISSON, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES 30" DIAMETER CAISSON. CLARIFY.
13. SHEET S7; DETAIL 01: ADD A NOTE FOR THE CAISSON TIES AND SPACING.
14. SHEET S7; DETAIL 02: HOW ARE THE CHANNEL RAFTER AND CHANNEL BEAM CONNECTED TO THE STEEL PLATE? PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWING.
15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/30/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM02241
534 N 4TH
72.285KW Photovoltaic System, 3 systems,
total 237 modules, 15 arrays.

The electrical plans have been denied for the following:
1. Now requesting following items on photovoltaic systems,
a. Block diagram, for each system ( each service), showing all items on same sheet,see attached.
b. One line diagram for each system (each service), showing all items on one sheet, see attached.
Items a and b being requested for ease of understanding entire system on it's own, for office and inspectors.
2. New lockable junction boxes used for interruption of unprotected conductors, size the junction box to be used per 2005 NEC-314, and indicate on plan, concerning the conductors entering and leaving. Describe the type of splicing to be used.
Have these junction boxes been approved by TEP ?
3. The new Photovoltaic Service Disconnects, note on plan they are to be Listed per 230.70.B. Also note they are to be identified per 230.2.E.
4. Sheet PV1.9 shows the arrays , #4 shows 4 arrarys, #5 shows two.
5. Two PV Panels are new one is existing , provide panel schedules for them.

Ray T Majuta,
Elect Pln Ck,
PDSD, City of Tucson,
12/01/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/06/2010 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/06/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed