Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02221
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | No site plan (Sheets 1 and 1A) was submitted with the review package. All sheets include building plan details. No review could be processed since a site plan was not submitted. See comments posted under the 10OCT10 letter. |
| 08/24/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 14, 2010 SUBJECT: 2303 E Valencia Road- Site Plan Engineering Review TO: Troy Williams LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec08 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T10CM02221 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T10CM02221) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS Sec.10-01.2.1: Provide a Drainage Statement with resubmittal to include a discussion on Critical Basin requirements. The property lies within a critical and balanced basin per the Balanced and Critical Basin Management Plan Study. Since the parcel is currently all impervious and has been prior to the Basin Management Plan Study the only requirement is to maximize water harvesting and landscape areas. However a Statement is required to discuss all drainage patterns and provide a discussion on the basin requirements. An example of the discussion could be worded like: "The subject property is within a critical basin per the Balanced and Critical Basin Management Plan Study therefore detention requirements plus a 15% reduction is required for the Q2, 10 and 100 year discharge. Though detention requirements can not be waived for parcels that are within a critical basin it is acknowledged by the City of Tucson Floodplain Manager that the building and asphalt parking lot existed prior to the introduction of the Balanced and Critical Basin Management Plan Study therefore the proposed improvements do not increase or decrease the existing flows or basin study as long as designed per the Drainage Statement. Since the property is commercial and less than 1 acre 5-year threshold retention is not required." SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 2) Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section this comment letter does not reflect all of the comments or quality control comments that must be addressed prior to resubmittal of the site plan. Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.2-02, 3-01, 3-05 and 6-01 and are reflected on the site plan sheets. 3) Since the site plan will be used as the construction document all details, dimensions and keynotes must be added to the plan set. Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within the above referenced sections and are reflected on the revised plan sheets. 4) It is recommended to revise all notes and references on the site plan to correctly read "City of Tucson Planning and Development Services" where indicated by "City of Tucson Development Services." All future plans should reference the new City name for the department. 5) Provide a General Note on the site plan that references all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for both Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone, LUC Sec.2.8.3 and the Gateway Corridor Zone, LUC Sec.2.8.4. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1: Revise the text size on all plan sheets to meet the minimum 3/32" height requirements. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Revise the site plan to include all lot dimensions and bearings. Provide a lot combination approval through the Zoning Section. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing vehicular use area to verify conformance with the minimum requirements of DS Sec.3-05. Or provide a copy of the last approved site plan that shows the existing vehicular use areas to be in conformance with the Development Standards. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to dimension the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths for all two-way traffic (12-foot for one-way traffic unless used as a Fire Access Lane then 20-foot minimum) at all locations on the site plan. All driveway entrances must also meet the minimum 24-foot width requirements for 2-way traffic. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to verify that all existing parking spaces meet the minimum width requirements of DS Sec.3-05. Label and dimension in plan view or provide a standard parking space detail for reference. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide dimensions for the required back-up spur within the vehicular use area on the south side of the building adjacent to the east property line. Verify the minimum 3 feet in depth, 3-foot radii, and a 3 foot separation between curb and the fence along the property line. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the plan sheets to label and dimension both the existing and/or future SVTs (near and far side) for the PAAL access points. Since Valencia Road has a median the far side triangle would be dimensioned as a pedestrian triangle (20'x30'). Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 and Figure 16 for SVT procedures and criteria. Also provide a revised landscape plan to reflect the SVT shown on the plan set. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the required 25-foot radii for both sides of the proposed PAAL entry point per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to clarify all curbing and/or concrete headers within the right-of-way. Provide the location with a label to the Standard Detail for Public Improvement for the existing/proposed improvement. Specifically for the PAAL entrances off of Valencia Road. Label the driveway widths in plan view to verify minimum width requirements per Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label the required sidewalk from the proposed building to the right-of-way of Valencia Road per DS Sec.2-08.3.1. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide on the site plan a loading zone area and verify the maneuverability for the required loading zone. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. Label the minimum inside and outside radii for the loading zone to verify maneuverability. 18) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-way and future Major Streets and Routes right-of-way for Valencia Road. Label the roadway as; "Public, Gateway Route and MS&R." 19) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required setback measured from the future curb to the future right-of-way, for the location of the future 6-foot sidewalk and curbing. 20) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are labeled with recordation information on the site plan, if applicable 21) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set to provide a dumpster enclosure detail to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, and bin enclosure construction. All construction details and dimensions must be shown on the site plan or refuse detail for construction purposes. 22) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set to label and dimension the refuse maneuverability. Provide the required 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach and verify the maximum allowed back up distance for maneuverability. 23) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and a Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929 Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 08/29/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | No new site plan has been submitted. Refer to the original comments: Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants b. the location and size of the backflow preventer for the water service c. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer d. the location of the building connection to the public sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the next upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts f. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 08/31/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Airport Inn Expansion T10CM02221 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site due to a building expansion greater than 25%. 2. The proposed project is zoned P-1, Based on the building use shown on the site plan "BAR OR TAVERN" this use would be considered Alcoholic Beverage Service. As Alcoholic Beverage Service is not an allowed use in the P-1 zone the use would be considered non-conforming. Provide a letter from the Zoning Administrator that allows the expansion of a non-conforming use or re-zoning is required to do any expansion. 3. This site is comprised of two (2) separate parcels. That said, a lot combination is required. Prior to approval of this site plan provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form, and a copy of the recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property along with the recordation information, docket and page. 4. Provide a note on the plan stating "THIS SITE IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(s) CRITERIA: SEC 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK AONE; SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE; Sec. 2.8.5, AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)." 5. The dimension text shown on the plan does not meet the 3/32" height requirements. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 Clearly show all lot lines on the plan. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6 For all existing and proposed buildings and structures provide; size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use on the site plan. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.7 Provide dimensions for all building setbacks on the site plan. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a fully dimensioned parking layout. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show existing and future sight visibility triangles 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide width dimension for the entrance driveways. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Provide a pedestrian circulation path/accessible route, sidewalk, to the sidewalk located within the right-of-way along Valencia Road. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a width dimension for all existing and proposed sidewalks. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide width dimensions for all parking area access lanes (PAALs) shown on the plan. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the type, size and height of any existing or proposed signage on site. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the required 12' x 35' loading space and maneuvering area on the plan. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Valencia Road as a Gateway Corridor. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide a fully dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable all easements of record must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show the existing and proposed lighting sight lighting on the plan. 23. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 The zoning for this parcel and adjacent parcels is not correct. The correct zoning is P-1. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the existing zoning for the parcel on the south side of Valencia. 25. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use, base on a use listed in the Land Use Code (LUC). 26. Until comment 2 has been addressed the required calculations cannot be verified. 27. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 Remove the reference to "LOT NET AREA" from the plan. 28. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Remove the lot coverage from the plan as it is not applicable. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) as required by the LUC. 29. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Alcoholic Beverage Service, the vehicle parking requirement is one (1) space per fifty (50) sq. ft. of gross floor area. 30. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Provide a bicycle parking space calculation on the plan that includes the number required and provided. 31. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Provide a loading space calculation on the plan that includes the number required and provided. 32. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 33. Provide a height for the proposed building based on LUC Section 2.8.5.11.B. 34. As this project is within the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) the maximum height listed under "SITE PLAN & GRADING NOTE #5" is not correct. Per the AEZ maps the maximum height is 34'-0" based on the NE end of runway 21 and the Median Sea Level (M.S.L.) elevation of 2,567 feet. 35. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02221 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/06/2011 | GBONILL1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/06/2011 | GBONILL1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review |