Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02221
Parcel: 140280340

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T10CM02221
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/08/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Airport Inn Expansion
T10CM02221
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2010


1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t10cm02221.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
10/14/2010 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 14, 2010
SUBJECT: 2303 E Valencia Road- Site Plan Engineering Review
TO: Troy Williams
LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec08 Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T10CM02221 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T10CM02221) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

1) DS Sec.10-01.2.1: Provide a Drainage Statement with resubmittal to include a discussion on Critical Basin requirements. The property lies within a critical and balanced basin per the Balanced and Critical Basin Management Plan Study. Since the parcel is currently all impervious and has been prior to the Basin Management Plan Study the only requirement is to maximize water harvesting and landscape areas. However a Statement is required to discuss all drainage patterns and provide a discussion on the basin requirements. An example of the discussion could be worded like: "The subject property is within a critical basin per the Balanced and Critical Basin Management Plan Study therefore detention requirements plus a 15% reduction is required for the Q2, 10 and 100 year discharge. Though detention requirements can not be waived for parcels that are within a critical basin it is acknowledged by the City of Tucson Floodplain Manager that the building and asphalt parking lot existed prior to the introduction of the Balanced and Critical Basin Management Plan Study therefore the proposed improvements do not increase or decrease the existing flows or basin study as long as designed per the Drainage Statement. Since the property is commercial and less than 1 acre 5-year threshold retention is not required."


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

2) Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section this comment letter does not reflect all of the comments or quality control comments that must be addressed prior to resubmittal of the site plan. Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.2-02, 3-01, 3-05 and 6-01 and are reflected on the site plan sheets.

3) Since the site plan will be used as the construction document all details, dimensions and keynotes must be added to the plan set. Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within the above referenced sections and are reflected on the revised plan sheets.

4) It is recommended to revise all notes and references on the site plan to correctly read "City of Tucson Planning and Development Services" where indicated by "City of Tucson Development Services." All future plans should reference the new City name for the department.

5) Provide a General Note on the site plan that references all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for both Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone, LUC Sec.2.8.3 and the Gateway Corridor Zone, LUC Sec.2.8.4.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1: Revise the text size on all plan sheets to meet the minimum 3/32" height requirements.

7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Revise the site plan to include all lot dimensions and bearings. Provide a lot combination approval through the Zoning Section.

8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing vehicular use area to verify conformance with the minimum requirements of DS Sec.3-05. Or provide a copy of the last approved site plan that shows the existing vehicular use areas to be in conformance with the Development Standards.

9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to dimension the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths for all two-way traffic (12-foot for one-way traffic unless used as a Fire Access Lane then 20-foot minimum) at all locations on the site plan. All driveway entrances must also meet the minimum 24-foot width requirements for 2-way traffic.

10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to verify that all existing parking spaces meet the minimum width requirements of DS Sec.3-05. Label and dimension in plan view or provide a standard parking space detail for reference.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide dimensions for the required back-up spur within the vehicular use area on the south side of the building adjacent to the east property line. Verify the minimum 3 feet in depth, 3-foot radii, and a 3 foot separation between curb and the fence along the property line. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification.

12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the plan sheets to label and dimension both the existing and/or future SVTs (near and far side) for the PAAL access points. Since Valencia Road has a median the far side triangle would be dimensioned as a pedestrian triangle (20'x30'). Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 and Figure 16 for SVT procedures and criteria. Also provide a revised landscape plan to reflect the SVT shown on the plan set.

13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the required 25-foot radii for both sides of the proposed PAAL entry point per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards.

14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to clarify all curbing and/or concrete headers within the right-of-way. Provide the location with a label to the Standard Detail for Public Improvement for the existing/proposed improvement. Specifically for the PAAL entrances off of Valencia Road. Label the driveway widths in plan view to verify minimum width requirements per Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code.

15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label the required sidewalk from the proposed building to the right-of-way of Valencia Road per DS Sec.2-08.3.1.

16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project.

17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide on the site plan a loading zone area and verify the maneuverability for the required loading zone. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. Label the minimum inside and outside radii for the loading zone to verify maneuverability.

18) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-way and future Major Streets and Routes right-of-way for Valencia Road. Label the roadway as; "Public, Gateway Route and MS&R."

19) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required setback measured from the future curb to the future right-of-way, for the location of the future 6-foot sidewalk and curbing.

20) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are labeled with recordation information on the site plan, if applicable

21) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set to provide a dumpster enclosure detail to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, and bin enclosure construction. All construction details and dimensions must be shown on the site plan or refuse detail for construction purposes.

22) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set to label and dimension the refuse maneuverability. Provide the required 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach and verify the maximum allowed back up distance for maneuverability.

23) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan and a Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services
10/18/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project (48 fixture units equates to a demand of 28 GPM).
2. Show the location of the backflow preventer (RP) on the site plan.
10/19/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. The 2006 IRC is not applicable.
2. Revise the waste and vent isometrics to coordinate with the plumbing plans. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities (e.g. a service sink) required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2006, for an assembly (A2) occupancy.
4. Clearly indicate the materials (e.g. Type M Copper, Schedule 40 PVC, etc) to be used in the proposed plumbing systems for this activity. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 301.1, 604.0, 701.0, 903.0, 1102.0, and 129.5, UPC 2006.
5. Revise the water calculations and the water supply and waste fixture-unit schedules on sheets 13 and 14 to coordinate with the submitted plans. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 610.1, and 702.0, UPC 2006.
6. Clarify "Deep Fryer #1" - it is described a fryer and as a furnace on sheet 13. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
7. Provide a site plumbing drawing that clearly shows the building sewer (route, size, material, and locations of cleanouts) and how it relates to the proposed building drains. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
8. The maximum flow rates for plumbing fixtures shall be consistent with ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12. (See text at: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp). In addition, Accessible metering faucets shall remain open for a minimum of 10 seconds. Reference: Section 402.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003.
9. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.
10. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the valves, expansion tank, flue size, flue height, and flue termination (note that the second-story will directly effect the termination of the flue). Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, and 608.3, UPC 2006.
11. Appliances (e.g. soda dispensers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
12. Provide a floor drain in the kitchen. Reference: Sections 411.2.2 and 704.3, UPC 2006.
13. Specify the proposed grease interceptor (type, manufacturer, model, and listings) and show which fixtures are to be connected to the interceptor. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1014.0, UPC 2006.
14. Clarify the roof drainage shown on sheet 8. The west side (?) of the existing pitched roof appears to have no drainage. Provide a north arrow on all building plans and indicate from where all of the sections on sheet 10 have been taken. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
15. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
16. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Include the effect of side walls draining onto the roof in the calculations. Reference: Sections 1101.11 and 1106.0, UPC 2006.
17. Show the location of the automatic shutoff valve for the natural gas service to the cooking equipment. Reference: Section 904.11.2, IFC 2006.
10/19/2010 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
10/19/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the current code (Zone 2, Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Coordinate the drawing notes with the details, e.g. details 6, 7, 8, and 11 on sheet 7 call for R-38 blown-in insulation but the notes on sheet 3 call for R-30 insulation and the sections on sheet 10 call for R-38 batt insulation; the exterior walls are called out as 8" CMU with a 4" furr-out but the notes call for 5-1/2", R-19 insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Provide a mechanical design for the proposed building addition that clearly shows that the installation will comply with the requirements of Sections 302, 307, 309, 401, and 601, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide a design for the proposed Type I hood installation that clearly shows that the installation will comply with the requirements of Sections 302, 506, 507, and 508, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
10/20/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET C1 (DEFERRED SUBMITTALS); SHEET 1 (EXISTING BUILDING): SHEET C1 INDICATES A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. SHEET 1 INDICATES THE EXISTING BUILDING IS NOT SPRINKLERED. IS THE ADDITION THE ONLY SPRINKLERED PORTION, OR IS THE ENTIRE BUILDING BEING SPRINKLERED? VERIFY.
2. SHEET C1; APPLICABLE CODES: REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE REFERENCE DATE.
3. SHEET 1; EXISTING BUILDING: WITH THE BUILDING USE DESIGNATION OF "BAR OR TAVERN", THIS IS NOT AN OCCUPANCY GROUP S. REVISE.
4. SHEET 3; FLOOR PLAN: AT THE STAIRS, THE NOTE "HANDRAIL PER IBC 2006" IS NOT ADEQUATE. PROVIDE SPECIFIC INFORMATION AND DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING HANDRAIL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1012 OF THE IBC ARE MET.
5. SHEET 3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET 9 (NORTH ELEVATION): A NOTE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SMOKING PATIO INDICATES A NEW 3'-0" HIGH WALL, WHILE THE ELEVATION INDICATES A 3'-2" WALL. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET 3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET 4 (DIMENSION PLAN): THE CORRIDOR BETWEEN THE EXISTING BAR AND THE SMOKING PATIO IS NOT SHOWN THE SAME ON BOTH PLANS. REVISE.
7. SHEET 3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET 4 (DIMENSION PLAN): THE EXIT DOOR (03) ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING SHOWS A SWING IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS ON THE TWO PLANS. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET 3; FLOOR PLAN: A NOTE AT THE WEST ENTRANCE (03) INDICATES "FURR OUT EXTERIOR WALLS 4" AND INSULATE AS PER SPECIFICATIONS". PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS JOB.
9. SHEET 3; FLOOR PLAN: A NOTE AT THE WEST BLOCK WALL INDICATES "PROVIDE VERTICAL AT ALL CORNERS, EDGES OF OPENINGS, AND END OF WALLS AS REQUIRED". ADD DETAILS TO THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THIS REINFORCING.
10. SHEET 4; DIMENSION PLAN: PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE CLEAR STAIRWAY WIDTH TO ENSURE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1009.1 OF THE IBC ARE MET.
11. SHEET 4; DIMENSION PLAN: PROVIDE A SECTION THROUGH THE STAIR INDICATING TREAD AND RISER REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1009.3 OF THE IBC ARE MET.
12. SHEET 4; DIMENSION PLAN: PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE STAIRWAY LANDING INDICATING LANDING DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1009.4 OF THE IBC ARE MET.
13. SHEET 4; DIMENSION PLAN: PROVIDE A DIMENSION FOR THE CLEAR CORRIDOR WIDTH TO ENSURE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1017.2 OF THE IBC ARE MET.
14. SHEET 5; EXISTING ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE AT THE EXISTING ROOF INDICATES "CUT EXISTING TRUSS AND REMOVE EXISTING PLYWOOD FOR NEW STAIR OPENING". ARE THE EXISTING ROOF TRUSSES AT THE NEW SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO REMAIN IN PLACE (PER SHEET 10, SECTION A)? VERIFY.
15. SHEET 5 (EXISTING ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET 7 (DETAIL 6): THE EXTERIOR WALL NOTE INDICATES 2X8@16" OC, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES 2X6 STUDS AT 16" OC. CLARIFY.
16. SHEET 6 (FLOOR/ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 3): BEAM B1 IN THE CALCULATIONS (2-2X10) DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE FRAMING PLAN. VERIFY.
17. SHEET 6 (FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 10): THE HEADERS H1 (2-2X8) AND H2 (2-2X6) DO NOT SHOW UP ON THE FRAMING PLAN. VERIFY.
18. SHEET 6; BOXED NOTE: THE SKYLIGHT GLAZING MATERIAL NOTE REFERENCES THE IRC. REVISE.
19. SHEET 6; BOXED NOTE: THE NAILING NOTE REFERENCES THE IRC. REVISE.
20. SHEET 6 (FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 11): THE COLUMNS C1 (2X6) AND C2 (6X6) AT THE HEADERS DO NOT SHOW UP ON THE FRAMING PLAN. VERIFY.
21. SHEET 6; STEEL LINTEL TABLE: THE LINTEL FOR A 2'-0" TO 6'-0" OPENING IS INCORRECT. THERE IS NO
5 1/2X3 1/2X1/4 ANGLE. REVISE.
22. SHEET 6 (STEEL LINTEL TABLE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 25): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE LINTEL SPAN IS 0 TO 4'-0", WHILE THE TABLE INDICATES THE SPAN IS 2'-0" TO 6'-0". REDESIGN THE LINTEL FOR A 6 FOOT SPAN.
23. SHEET 6; FLOOR/ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REMOVE THE 'OSB' DESIGNATION FROM THE TWO PLANS. FLOOR AND ROOF SHEATHING TO BE PLYWOOD. VERIFY.
24. SHEET 6 (FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE LATERAL DESIGN FOR THE SECOND FLOOR PLYWOOD DIAPHRAGM WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY.
25. SHEET 7; DETAIL 5: INDICATE THE FOOTING IS 2'-0" SQUARE.
26. SHEET 7; DETAIL 4: IS THE FOOTING THICKNESS OF 8" CORRECT? VERIFY.
27. SHEET 7; DETAILS 13 AND 14: THE BEAMS INDICATED IN THE SECTIONS ARE NOT EXISTING. VERIFY.
28. SHEET 7; DETAIL 8: IS THE VERTICAL REINFORCING SPACING CORRECT? IT DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. VERIFY.
29. SHEET 7: DETAIL 7: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND INDICATE ON DETAIL 7 THE CONNECTION OF THE NEW SILL PLATE TO THE EXISTING CMU WALL.
30. SHEET 7; DETAIL 3: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE MINIMUM EMBEDMENT DEPTH OF THE DOWEL INTO THE EXISTING STEM WALL.
31. SHEET 7; DETAILS 6 AND 7: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE DETAILS FOR THE CONNECTION OF THE NEW STUD WALL TO THE EXISTING CMU WALL.
32. SHEET 7; DETAIL 10: IS THE ROOF DECK PLYWOOD? VERIFY.
33. SHEET 7; DETAIL 11: IS THE LOW ROOF DECK PLYWOOD? VERIFY.
34. SHEET 7; DETAIL 11: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE DETAIL FOR THE CONNECTION OF THE NEW STUD WALL TO THE EXISTING CMU WALL.
35. SHEET 7; DETAILS 6, 7, 8, 11, AND 16: REVISE THE INSULATION NOTE FROM 'BLOWN-IN' TO BATT. VERIFY.
36. SHEET 8; BOXED NOTE: THE ROOF VENTS NOTE REFERENCES THE IRC. REVISE.
37. SHEET 9; NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS: PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE WROUGHT IRON TO THE STUD WALL CONNECTION.
38. SHEET 9; LADDER DETAIL: PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE LADDER TO WALL FACE CONNECTION AND THE LADDER TO THE TOP OF WALL CONNECTION.
39. GENERAL: PROVIDE A CODE ANALYSIS ON THE DRAWINGS, INCLUDING OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EACH FLOOR, MEANS OF EGRESS WIDTH REQUIREMENTS AND WIDTHS PROVIDED, EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCES, AND PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED (INCLUDING WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, SERVICE SINK).
40. GENERAL: PROVIDE NORTH ARROWS ON ALL BUILDING PLANS.
41. GENERAL: SECTION 3409.4 OF THE IBC REQUIRES ACCESSIBLE FEATURES AS LISTED. ADDRESS THESE ISSUES.
42. GENERAL: ON THE DRAWINGS, PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION COST BREAKDOWN, INDICATING HOW REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3409.7 OF THE IBC ARE MET.
43. GENERAL: PROVIDE WALL FINISH SCHEDULE AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ON THE DRAWINGS.
44. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CREATED BY MECHANICAL LOADINGS ACTING ON THE ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS, USING SPECIFIC, CONCENTRATED POINT LOADS, FOR USE BY THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER.
45. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED (LEERAY.HANLY@TUCSONAZ.GOV).
46. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/20/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
11/01/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need capacity evaluation by kurt stemm- 3rd floor- 740-6607
need IWC review & approval by Tom Tomchak- 443-6200
5025 W Ina RD(dishwasher may not be permitted to discharge thru mech grease trap)

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/05/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/05/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed