Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM02172
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/06/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/09/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs 5th floor credit evaluation needs IWC review/approval- Tom Tomchak- 579-5771-5025 W Ina Rd need capcity evaluation-Kurt Stemm-740-6607- 3rd floor |
| 08/12/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM02172 Panda Express The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements , 2006 IECC --Lighting Budget Calculations must be submitted with plans. 21. The total connected load for Panel A1 added incorrectly, please check. Ray T Majuta, Elect Pln CK, PDSD, City Of Tucson, 8/15/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/17/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/17/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/17/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/18/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/18/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a reference copy of the civil drawings referenced on the plumbing sheets. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Verify the water service to the suite. The shell drawings indicate that suites 101 (Panda Express) and 107 are served by a 1-1/2" water meter and a 1-1/2" reduced pressure backflow preventer, not 2" as noted on sheet P-2.0. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 610.2, UPC 2006. 3. Coordinate the natural gas piping design; the gas equipment schedule on P-2.0 does not agree with the gas riser diagram on P-3.0 and neither agrees with the kitchen equipment schedule and plan on K-1.0. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Verify that all of the existing rooftop units have gas heating; the shell drawings indicate that units 1 and 2 are heat pumps. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Coordinate the waste and vent design. The waste and vent floor plan does not agree with the waste and vent riser diagram for fixture and pipe sizes, fixture locations, and the type of waste system (i.e. sanitary waste or grease waste) Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 6. One trench drain and seven floor sinks are shown on the waste and vent floor plan and the waste and vent riser diagram; they are noted as "4"GS,2V". Clarify the basis for providing 4" traps for these fixtures. Reference: footnotes 1 and 7, Table 7-3, UPC 2006. 7. Clarify the number of floor sinks being installed; the fixture unit schedule on sheet P-2.0 calls out ten floor sinks (E) but only seven are shown on the drawings. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 8. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 9. Clarify detail6/P-4.0; it appears to show two compartments with no trap, connecting to the trap arm of the floor sink. The wash and rinse compartments shall have a vented trap that is separate from the trap and vent for the floor sink. It is not clear on the detail what is happening with the 3" waste line on the right side of the drawing. See also Section 704.3, UPC 2006 for further installation requirements for dishwashing sinks. Reference: Sections 704.1, 901.0, 1001.1, 1001.2, 1002.1, and 1002.4, UPC 2006. 10. Revise the detail of the "Ariston GL6" water heater installation (1/P-3.0), to include the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, vacuum relief, and isolation valves. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006. 11. Revise the location of the expansion tank for water heater P2 so that it cannot be valved off from the water heater. Reference: Section 608.3, UPC 2006. 12. Coordinate the hot water distribution design; the plumbing plan and the water riser diagram do not agree with detail 1/P-3.0. The plumbing plan and water riser diagram show a Watts L111 mixing valve but detail 1/P-3.0 calls for a Watts 70 extender valve. The extender valve is not listed for scald-protection. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 310.4, UPC 2006. 13. The kitchen equipment schedule on sheet K-1.0 and the fixture unit schedule on sheet P-2.0 indicate water is to be supplied to appliances not shown on the plumbing plans or riser diagram. Show each water connection. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 14. Appliances (e.g. ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 15. Provide calculations to show how the size of the proposed grease interceptor has been determined. Reference: Section 1014.3.6, UPC 2006. |
| 08/19/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Verify the specifications for the existing rooftop units; the shell drawings indicate that units 1 and 2 are 7.5-ton heat pumps and unit 3 is a 6-ton A/C unit with gas heat. The packaged A/C unit schedule implies that all of the units have gas heat but the mechanical key notes on sheet M-1.0 states that RTU-1 and RTU-2 are 7.5-ton heat pumps and RTU-3 is a 5-ton heat pump. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Clarify the amount of outside air to be supplied to the suite. The flow rate shown on the packaged A/C unit schedule does not agree with the outside air calculations or the air balance schedule. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 4. Clarify the flow rate for exhaust fan EF-3, it is scheduled for 450 CFM but the mechanical plans call for 500 CFM of exhaust. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 403.3, IMC 2006. 5. Verify the exhaust fan schedule for fans EF-1 and EF-2. The plans and the shop drawings do not call for two pollution control units weighing 3,378 pounds each. If these units are to be used, provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting them. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 6. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006 (note that the requirements of Section 507.6 include designing for the weight of the hood, any unsupported ductwork, and the possible weight of personnel working on the hood). The Rod Connection detail on sheet M-3.0 is not applicable because the existing building does not have steel joists or steel beams. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 7. The Mechanical Specifications on sheet M-2.0 call for 16-gauge galvanized steel grease exhaust duct with welded joints. If galvanized steel is to be used, provide for special inspection of the welded joints. Reference: Section 105.3, IMC 2006 and Section 1704.1.1, IBC 2006. 8. Provide information to show that the clearance between the hood and the wall of the walk-in cooler complies with the requirements of Section 507.9, IMC 2006. 9. Coordinate the Grease Hood System Calculation on sheet M-3.0 to include both exhaust fans as shown with the actual design. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/02/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |