Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM02159
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/05/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/06/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Address on plans does not match address on permit form. Indicate if building is sprinklered. Occupant load is calculated at 1 per 60 sq. ft. This is the number for 2nd floor Mercantile occupancy. Ground floor ratio is 1 per 30 sq. ft. Another exit may be required. |
| 08/11/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1; TENANT IMPROVEMENT CODE REVIEW (OCCUPANT LOAD): VERIFY THE MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLOWABLE PER OCCUPANT (TABLE 1004.1.1 OF THE 2006 IBC). 30 SF/OCCUPANT IS TYPICAL FOR MERCANTILE. REVISE EXIT REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED. 2. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE AN ENLARGED, DIMENSIONED PLAN OF THE WOMEN'S AND MEN'S RESTROOMS, INDICATING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 (CHAPTER 6) ARE MET. 3. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE AN ELEVATION OF THE CASH WRAP COUNTER, INDICATING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF ICC/ANSI (SECTION 904) ARE MET. 4. SHEET A1; CODE REVIEW (NUMBER OF EXITS): THE DRAWING INDICATES I EXIT IS PROVIDED, WHILE THE FLOOR PLAN INDICATES 2. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: IF TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED, VERIFY THE DOORWAY ARRANGEMENT MEETS IBC SECTION 1015.2.1, AND SHOW THESE DIMENSIONS ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. SHEET S1.0; REFERENCE PLAN: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE STEEL AROUND THE NEW MASONRY OPENING. 7. SHEET S1.0; DETAIL 101: THE BASE PLATE WIDTH MATCHES THE COLUMN WIDTH. IS IT POSSIBLE TO WELD ALL AROUND THE COLUMN WITH A 3/16" FILLET WELD? VERIFY. 8. SHEET S1.0; DETAIL 101: THE TUBE COLUMN IS REFERENCED AS A HSS6X4X1/4. INDICATE THE CORRECT SIZE ON THE SECTION CUT #. THE BASE PLATE AND EXPANSION ANCHORS WILL NOT WORK AS SHOWN. REVISE. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/12/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 08/12/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 08/20/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Tucson Water limits a 1" meter to a maximum demand of 25 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project with a demand of 29 GPM. Reference: Sections 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006 |
| 08/20/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/20/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the scope of the mechanical work for this activity. The "New Mechanical General Notes" on sheet A1 indicate that two new 5-ton split-system heat pumps and new ductwork are being installed but the mechanical drawing, MP-1, only shows two exhaust fans being installed. |
| 08/31/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Electrical plans denied for followiing: 1. No electrical plans provided for new 5 ton mechanical units to be added per sheet A. No electrical plans for 15 new 2 x4 to be installed as per sheet A1. No electrical plans for new ex-haust fans for toilets. Ray T Majuta Elect Plans Ex PDSD City of Tuc, 8/31/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/02/2010 | DROBEY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |