Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM02102
Parcel: 13316024P

Address:
6350 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T10CM02102
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/03/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
Indicate on plans hazard classification for specific areas.
Also, note on cover sheet states "sprinklers throughout".
Please confirm that this means sprinklers under every covered structure.
08/04/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET CS (PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT); SHEET CA1.00 (TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD): THE OCCUPANT LOAD USED TO CALCULATE THE PLUMBING FIXTURES (SHEET CS) DOES NOT MATCH THE OCCUPANT LOAD LISTED ON SHEET CA1.00. CLARIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
2. SHEET CS; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: CHANGE THE REFERENCE FROM SHEET S1.1 TO S1.01. VERIFY.
3. SHEET CS; ADOPTED CODES: ADD THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 FOR ACCESSIBILITY.
4. SHEET CS; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT: REVISE THE NUMBER OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS REQUIRED. TABLE 2902.1 OF THE IBC REQUIRES 1 DRINKING FOUNTAIN (HIGH/LOW OR SINGLE POINT OF USE) IN THE BUSINESS AREA OF 1 PER 100 OCCUPANTS. THEREFORE, 349/100 = 3.5, OR 4 DRINKING FOUNTAINS. VERIFY.
5. SHEET CS; DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: SHOULD THE DRAWINGS FOR THE PARTS AREA (LEVELS 2 AND 3) BE INCLUDED IN DEFERRED SUBMITTALS? VERIFY.
6. SHEET CS; DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: SHOULD THE DRAWINGS FOR THE OPEN DISPLAY CANOPY BE INCLUDED IN DEFERRED SUBMITTALS? DETAILS 227 AND 228 ON SHEET S5.02 REFER TO STEEL COLUMNS BY OTHERS. VERIFY.
7. SHEET CA1.00; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE TRAVEL DISTANCE TABLE REFERENCE SHOULD BE 1016.1. VERIFY.
8. SHEET CA1.00; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING TABLE REFERENCE SHOULD BE 1017.1. VERIFY.
9. SHEET CA1.00; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE EXIT DOOR SEPARATION DISTANCE REFERENCE SHOULD BE SECTION 1015.2.1 EXCEPTION 2. VERIFY.
10. SHEET CA1.01; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE TRAVEL DISTANCE TABLE REFERENCE SHOULD BE 1016.1. VERIFY.
11. SHEET CA1.01; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING TABLE REFERENCE SHOULD BE 1017.1. VERIFY.
12. SHEET CA1.01; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE EXIT DOOR SEPARATION DISTANCE REFERENCE SHOULD BE SECTION 1015.2.1 EXCEPTION 2. VERIFY.
13. SHEET CA1.02; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE TRAVEL DISTANCE TABLE REFERENCE SHOULD BE 1016.1. VERIFY.
14. SHEET CA1.02; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING TABLE REFERENCE SHOULD BE 1017.1. VERIFY.
15. SHEET CA1.02; LIFE SAFETY DATA: THE EXIT DOOR SEPARATION DISTANCE REFERENCE SHOULD BE SECTION 1015.2.1 EXCEPTION 2. VERIFY.
16. SHEET AS1.02; DETAIL 11: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE WALL AND FOOTING DESIGN.
17. SHEET AS1.02; DETAIL 9: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE FLAG POLE FOOTING DESIGN.
18. SHEET A4.00; ELEVATIONS 6, 12, 15, 17, 21, AND 31: A VERTICAL GRAB BAR SHALL BE ADDED PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1.
19. SHEET A4.00; ELEVATION 26: PROVIDE A VERTICAL GRAB BAR AT THE SHOWER PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 608.5.1.
20. SHEET A4.01; ELEVATION 19: ADD VERTICAL GRAB BARS AT THE WATER CLOSET AND SHOWER PER ICC/ANSI A117.1.
21. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); BEAM B14 (LO) SOUTH OF GRID H.0: DOES THIS BEAM EXTEND NORTH OF THE COLUMN AT GRID H.0, OR DOES IT STOP AND ANOTHER BEAM EXTENDS NORTH TO THE 4X4X3/8 TUBE COLUMN? CLARIFY.
22. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); W16X40 BEAM AT APPROXIMATE GRID H.0: DID NOT LOCATE THE DESIGN OF THIS BEAM IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. VERIFY.
23. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); HI/LOW B4 BEAMS ON GRIDS D.0, E.0, AND F.0: DID NOT LOCATE THE DESIGN OF THESE BEAMS IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. VERIFY.
24. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.04 (DETAIL 275): WHERE THE DETAIL IS CUT ON THE PLAN (BETWEEN GRIDS 8.0 AND 9.0), THE MEMBER IS A WF BEAM, NOT A JOIST AS DEPICTED. REVISE.
25. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.04 (DETAIL 277): REVIEW THE DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN (AT GRIDS F.0 AND 1.0). VERIFY THE DETAIL IS CORRECTLY SHOWN.
26. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.02 (DETAIL 239): THE DETAIL CUT BETWEEN GRIDS G.0 AND H.0 SHOULD INDICATE A SIMILAR DETAIL SINCE THERE IS A DOUBLE BEAM INDICATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
27. SHEET S3.01 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.01 (DETAIL 212): THE DETAIL CUT ON GRID H.0 HAS A DOUBLE BEAM AT THE BEARING. VERIFY THE BEARING PLATE SIZE AND ANCHORAGE FOR THE DOUBLE BEAM (NO PLATE SIZE INDICATED IN THE DETAIL 212 SCHEDULE FOR A W6).
28. SHEET S3.02 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S6.01 (DETAIL 312): THE DETAIL INDICATES CONCRETE PLANKS SPANNING THE WRONG DIRECTION. VERIFY.
29. SHEET S4.01; DETAIL 102: THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTING DOES NOT MATCH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATION (1'-6"). VERIFY.
30. SHEET S4.01; DETAILS 116, 117, AND 118: REVISE THE DRYPACK NOTE.
31. SHEET S5.01; DETAIL 203: NOTE 3 INDICATES 'STEEL ANGLE AS REQUIRED'. REVISE THAT NOTE WITH A SPECIFIC ANGLE SIZE.
32. SHEET S5.02; DETAIL 232: REFERENCE A SIZE OR A DETAIL FOR THE STEEL CONNECTION PLATE AT THE STEEL BEAM.
33. SHEET S5.02; DETAIL 225: CLARIFY THAT THE JOIST GIRDER IS SUPPORTED BY A STEEL ANGLE WELDED ONLY TO A STIFFENER PLATE.
34. SHEET S5.02; DETAIL 222: THE MEMBERS DESIGNATED AS STEEL JOISTS ARE JOIST GIRDERS. VERIFY.
35. SHEET S5.03; DETAIL 242: THE STEEL DECK ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE BEAM SHOULD BE DEPICTED THE SAME AS THE STEEL DECK ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE BEAM.
36. SHEET S5.03; DETAIL 250: THE HIGH AND LOW MEMBER DESIGNATED AS A STEEL JOIST IS A JOIST GIRDER. VERIFY.
37. SHEET S7.01; STEEL STAIR BEAM SCHEDULE: VERIFY THE SSB3 MEMBER IS SIZED CORRECTLY.
38. GENERAL: ADD A SPECIAL INSPECTION TO THE CERTIFICATE FOR SITE PREPARATION, FOUNDATION, AND EXCAVATION.
39. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
08/04/2010 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
08/06/2010 ERIC NEWCOMB HC REVIEW Denied 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS.
08/12/2010 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/17/2010 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the submitted energy code calculations to use the correct location (Pima County < 4,000 feet) and submit documentation to verify the R-values, U-factors, and SHGC of the roofs, exterior walls, glazing, and doors. Coordinate the calculations with the drawings and the building specifications. Reference: Sections 102.1 and 104.2, IECC 2006.
08/17/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Replace the specified 2-way cleanout at the junction of the new building sewer and the existing building sewer with an approved cleanout. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2006.
3. Verify that the sizing of the traps for the trench and floor drains in the detailing and car wash areas will result in the traps being self-scouring. (Note that a conventionally trapped system is generally unsuitable for sand-bearing waste because the relatively high density of the sand compared to the waster will result in accumulation of the sand in the traps instead of the interceptor.) Reference: Section 1002.2, IPC 2006.
4. Provide additional cleanouts for the building drain in the detailing and car wash areas per Section 708.3.3, IPC 2006.
5. Coordinate the design of the horizontal drains and vents for the restroom in the detailing area; the plumbing plan (detail 4/P1.3) does not agree with the waste and vent diagram on sheet P2.2. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
6. Provide a cleanout for the horizontal drain in the private restroom commencing at the floor drain by the shower. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2006.
7. Provide a letter from the Pima County Wastewater Reclamation Department stating that the contents of the elevator sump will be allowed to flow to the public sewer. Reference: Sections 1003.1 and 1003.4, IPC 2006.
8. Sand/oil separator SO-1 is listed for a flow rate of 20 GPM but sump pump SP-1 delivers 50 GPM. Clarify how this will work. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2006.
9. Provide a protecting vent for the second sand/oil separator (i.e. downstream of the interceptor, prior to the sampling chamber). Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2006.
10. Show the locations for the installation of water hammer arrestors for all quick-closing valves. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 604.9, IPC 2006.
11. Revise detail 1/P4.1 to include provision for controlling thermal expansion of the water. Reference: Section 607.3, IPC 2006.
12. Provide structural calculations and details to show that WH-2 is safely supported. Reference: Section 307, IPC 2006.
13. Revise the size of the water supplies to the urinals and water closets to reduce the water velocity to no more than 8 fps. Reference: Table 6-3 and Table 6-4, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
08/18/2010 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED CAPCITY EVALUATION FROM 3RD FLOOR- KURT STEMM 740-6607
NEED TO INDICATE ON PLAN THAT ALL FLOOR TROUGH AND TRENCH DRAINS ARE TO BE UNDER ROOF OR COVER ALSO CURBED AND/ORPAVEMENT PITCHED SO NOT TO ALLOW RAIN WATER TO FLOW INTO SANITARY SEWER.
NEED FIXTURE CREDIT EVALUATION BY 5TH FLOOR WASTE WATER MAPS & RECORDS
NEED IWC REVIEW AND APPROVED FOR SAND/GREASE INTERCEPTORS CONTACT TOM TOMCHAK 443-6200
08/20/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T10CM02102
6350 Grant RD
New Mercedes Benz Dealership

The electrical plans have been denied for the following items, please respond to each individually and show what was done to address each item.

1. Provide support details for transformers ( to be installed on walls).
2. Sheet E4.0, call out the conductors feeding the 75 kva transformers.
3. The #6 cu grd to steel for the 112.5kva transformers should be #4 cu, the derived phase conductors both equal 266,200cm- per table 250-66 requires a #4 cu.
4. Sheet E4.0, the 800 amp device with 3-sets of 300kcmil and #2 cu grd should be 1/0 cu per 2005 NEC 250-122.
5. The calculations for the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code appear to incorrect,
a. 19 SP3 fixtures are shown on Sheet E3.0,non are in the lumen count.
b. 6 SP6 shown on plan not on lumen count.
c. the two head fixtures,SP2,SP4,SP7,SP8,SP9,are shown only once in the lumen count when each is to counted
twice ?
d. provide a notation under the lumen calculation on Sheet E0.1 to indicate that per Section 16 of the Outdoor Lighting Code, a Special inspection is required , " In areas E-3 and E_3a special inspection as per Section of The Administrative Code is required if lumen count per net acre is greater than 100,000 lumens".

Ray T Majuta
PDSD, City of Tuc,
Elect Pln Ck
8/21/10
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
08/26/2010 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/22/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed