Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02007
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. As previously commented, provide the floodplain delineation in accordance with the most recent leter of map revision. 2. Show access to the loading zone and solid waste container location that meets the LUC requirements indicated by the zoning reviewer. 3. A floodplain use permit will be required for this project. |
| 01/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/14/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: OReilly Auto Parts T10CM02007 Site Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 16, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. This site consists of two (2) parcels. A lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request form and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of the building on the site plan within the footprint of the building. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The street perimeter yard setbacks shown on the plan are not shown correct. Per LUC Table 3.2.6-I the street perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of future or existing curb, which ever is more restrictive. Show the future curb if applicable on the plan and provide the setback dimension from the back of future or existing curb. Until the height of the building, see comment 3, is provided the setback requirements cannot be verified. Setback height is based on LUC Section 3.2.6.3. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Until the height of the building, see comment 3, is provided the setback requirement to the south property cannot be verified. The required setback to the south property line is one and one-half the height of the proposed building wall. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Remove the "BUILDING SETBACK" line shown on the plan as it is not shown correct. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto. On the parking space detail show the proposed wheel stops and a location dimension the meets the requirements of D.S.3-05.2.3.C.2 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. That said for the two (2) northern most vehicle parking spaces provide a width dimension from the proposed 30" screen wall to the edge of the vehicle parking space. This dimension must be 1'-6" or greater. The vehicle parking space located north of the refuse enclosure must be 10'-0" wide, provide a width dimension for this parking space. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per LUC Section 3.3.7.2.C.1 Compact-Sized Parking Spaces. Motor vehicle parking spaces sized for compact vehicles are allowed only within the Downtown Redevelopment District. That said this project is not located within the Downtown Redevelopment District therefore the four (4) vehicle parking spaces located along the south side of the building must meet the minimum width of 8.5 feet. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 For your information per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a bicycle parking detail that provides materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Provide the following dimensions on the detail; a. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.A Single posts or racks placed in a row will allow a minimum seventy-two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks. b. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.B a minimum of thirty-six (36) inches will be provided between a bicycle parking space and a perpendicular wall of other obstruction. c. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.B a minimum of thirty (30) inches will be provided between a bicycle parking space and a parallel wall of other obstruction as measured from the side of the bicycle rack to the parallel wall, see figure 9 d. Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two 972) inch long parking space. e. See D.S. 2-09.0 Figure 9.for bicycle parking layout. 12. This comment was not addressed correctly. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 The southern most SVT shown along N. Arcadia Ave. is not shown correctly. This SVT should line up with the edge of the driveway. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show all required existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. See Engineering comments. 13. This comment was not addressed correctly. For the west door provide a note on the plan stating "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS" and show the accessible route through the building. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1. a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route will be provided to the pedestrian circulation located in any adjacent streets. That said the proposed connection from the "EMERGENCY EXIT DOOR" must be accessible to the public and be and accessible route. Demonstrate on the site plan that the above conditions are met. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.C a four (4) foot sidewalk is required between the proposed vehicle parking spaces, located along the south side of the building, and the building. 15. This comment was not completely addressed. There are pop outs shown on the building in the area of the bollards that the sidewalk appears to be less than four (4) foot. Provide dimensions at the pop outs to the bollards. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There are "STEEL BOLLARDS" and "HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS" with bollards called out along the sidewalk adjacent to the accessible vehicle parking spaces. Clearly shown on the plan that the proposed bollards will not reduce the minimum sidewalk width to less than four (4) foot. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 With the requirement for a block wall along the south property line, see comment 22, D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. This will require a Board of Adjustment for Variance. LUC Section 3.3.7. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location type, size and height of existing and proposed signage on the site plan. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the loading space maneuvering area on the site plan. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Speedway Blvd. as an "MS&R" route. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the site plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 There appears to be some type of site lighting along the west property line. Provide the type of light and detail if pole mounted. 22. To eliminate the required screen wall will require a Board of Adjustment for Variance. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.26 Per LUC Table 3.7.2-I a five (5) foot high wall will be required along the majority of the south property line and a six (6) foot high wall will be required to screen the proposed loading space. 23. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 There is a potion of the parcel located on the east side of Arcadia Ave that is zone "P". Clearly show the split zoning on the site plan. 24. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the "SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.A" adjacent to the proposed use. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the site plan. The existing and proposed use should be listed as a use shown within the LUC. The proposed use should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "31", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.A" 25. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Remove the lot coverage from the calculation as it is not applicable. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) that meets the requirement of LUC Section 3.2.11. The FAR calculation should include the allow FAR and proposed FAR. 26. Provide a note on the plan stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 27. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. 28. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The proposed planters shown on the plan and detail 4/CC2 may not extend into the parking spaces more than two and one-half (2-1/2) feet, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2. To reduce the length of the vehicle parking space would require a Board of Adjustment for Variance. LUC Section 3.3.7.2.A. 29. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per LUC Table 3.3.7-I the minimum width for an access aisle that provides access to 90 degree parking is twenty-four (24) feet. That said the parking area access lane (PAAL) that provides access to the vehicle parking spaces along the south side of the proposed building is proposed to be 18.60' and does not meet the requirements of LUC Table 3.3.7.I. 30. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per LUC Section 3.3.7.5 Use of Street or Alley for Maneuvering Area. A street or alley may not be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way, except for Residential Care Services with four (4) or fewer spaces provided, single-family residential development, mobile home dwellings, or duplexes on individual lots. These exceptions are not applicable on MS&R designated streets as provided in Sec. 3.2.14.3. That said the proposed alley access along the south property line will require a Board of Adjustment for Variance. LUC Section 3.3.7.5 31. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed planters shown along the west side of the proposed building may not reduce the width of the proposed sidewalk to less than four (4) feet. Provide a dimension from the edge of planter to the building. 32. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Per LUC Section 3.3.4.2. Access Requirements. Access to a loading space shall be from a street. Access from an alley is also permitted, provided the alley is at least twenty (20) feet wide, paved for its entire block length, and zoning on both sides of the alley, for its entire length within the block, is nonresidential. LUC Section 3.3.4.2.A street may be used for maneuvering of a delivery vehicle into, or out of, a loading space, provided it is for a use with only one (1) space, and if: 3.3.4.2.A.2. The street is not a local residential street; or 3.3.4.2.A.3. The street does not abut a residential zone within the same block or within three hundred (300) feetof the nearest point of access to the loading zone. The three hundred (300) foot distance does not apply to the opposite side of a major street. That said the proposed loading space maneuvering area does not meet the LUC requirements. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required for street or alley access. LUC Section 3.3.4.2, 3.3.4.2.A.2 & 3 33. If a Board of Adjustment for Variance is applied for and approved on the site plan provide the following information; Board of Adjustment for Variance number, date of approval, what was approved. The Board of Adjustment for Variance must be approved prior to approval of the site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02007 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Site plan. |
| 12/15/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A five (5) foot high wall will be required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zone and a six (6) foot high wall will be required to screen the proposed loading space per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 2. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 4. When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3. Dimension parking space on the site, landscape, and grading plans. 5. The planters shown along the west side of the proposed building may not reduce the width of the proposed sidewalk to less than four (4) feet. Dimension all planters on the site, landscape, and grading plans. 6. If a Board of Adjustment for Variance is applied for and approved on the site plan provide the following information; Board of Adjustment for Variance number, date of approval, what was approved. 7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2011 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/21/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |