Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T10CM02007
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/14/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: OReilly Auto Parts T10CM02007 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 14, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. This site consists of two (2) parcels. A lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request form and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of the building on the site plan within the footprint of the building. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The street perimeter yard setbacks shown on the plan are not shown correct. Per LUC Table 3.2.6-I the street perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of future or existing curb, which ever is more restrictive. Show the future curb if applicable on the plan and provide the setback dimension from the back of future or existing curb. Until the height of the building, see comment 3, is provided the setback requirements cannot be verified. Setback height is based on LUC Section 3.2.6.3. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Until the height of the building, see comment 3, is provided the setback requirement to the south property cannot be verified. The required setback to the south property line is one and one-half the height of the proposed building wall. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Remove the "BUILDING SETBACK" line shown on the plan as it is not shown correct. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto. On the parking space detail show the proposed wheel stops and a location dimension the meets the requirements of D.S.3-05.2.3.C.2 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. That said for the two (2) northern most vehicle parking spaces provide a width dimension from the proposed 30" screen wall to the edge of the vehicle parking space. This dimension must be 1'-6" or greater. The vehicle parking space located north of the refuse enclosure must be 10'-0" wide, provide a width dimension for this parking space. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per LUC Section 3.3.7.2.C.1 Compact-Sized Parking Spaces. Motor vehicle parking spaces sized for compact vehicles are allowed only within the Downtown Redevelopment District. That said this project is not located within the Downtown Redevelopment District therefore the four (4) vehicle parking spaces located along the south side of the building must meet the minimum width of 8.5 feet. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 For your information per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a bicycle parking detail that provides materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Provide the following dimensions on the detail; a. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.A Single posts or racks placed in a row will allow a minimum seventy-two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks. b. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.B a minimum of thirty-six (36) inches will be provided between a bicycle parking space and a perpendicular wall of other obstruction. c. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.B a minimum of thirty (30) inches will be provided between a bicycle parking space and a parallel wall of other obstruction as measured from the side of the bicycle rack to the parallel wall, see figure 9 d. Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two 972) inch long parking space. e. See D.S. 2-09.0 Figure 9.for bicycle parking layout. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show all required existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. See Engineering comments. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1. a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route will be provided to the pedestrian circulation located in any adjacent streets. That said the proposed connection from the "EMERGENCY EXIT DOOR" must be accessible to the public and be and accessible route. Demonstrate on the site plan that the above conditions are met. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.C a four (4) foot sidewalk is required between the proposed vehicle parking spaces, located along the south side of the building, and the building. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There are "STEEL BOLLARDS" and "HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS" with bollards called out along the sidewalk adjacent to the accessible vehicle parking spaces. Clearly shown on the plan that the proposed bollards will not reduce the minimum sidewalk width to less than four (4) foot. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 With the requirement for a block wall along the south property line, see comment 22, D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location type, size and height of existing and proposed signage on the site plan. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the loading space maneuvering area on the site plan. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Speedway Blvd. as an "MS&R" route. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the site plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 There appears to be some type of site lighting along the west property line. Provide the type of light and detail if pole mounted. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.26 Per LUC Table 3.7.2-I a five (5) foot high wall will be required along the majority of the south property line and a six (6) foot high wall will be required to screen the proposed loading space. See Landscape comments. 23. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 There is a potion of the parcel located on the east side of Arcadia Ave that is zone "P". Clearly show the split zoning on the site plan. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the site plan. The existing and proposed use should be listed as a use shown within the LUC. The proposed use should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "31", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.A" 25. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Remove the lot coverage from the calculation as it is not applicable. Provide a floor area ratio (FAR) that meets the requirement of LUC Section 3.2.11. The FAR calculation should include the allow FAR and proposed FAR. 26. Provide a note on the plan stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 27. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t10cm02007 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Site plan. |
| 10/18/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: 1. Please provide dimensions of accessible parking space layout. OK 2. Please provide a large scale detail of the required accessible parking sign including "Van Accessible" signage and show sign locations on site plan. THE LOCATION OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN MUST BE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE PARKING SPACE. 3. The rear emergency exit must be accessible. a. The finish floor to top of sidewalk is 2" higher. Please provide a transition as per ANSI, Section 303.3. b. The slope of the sidewalk to the Arcadia pedestrian right of way is more than 5% which classifies this as a ramp and must comply with ANSI, Section 405. c. Please redesign and provide a large scale detail showing all critical accessible elements; dimensions, slopes, handrails, landings and etc. THE 6.4% SLOPE SHOWN ON DETAIL 3/CC1 INDICATES A RAMP THAT MUST THE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ICC(ANSI 117.1), SECTION 405 INCLUDING HANDRAILS AS PER SECTION 405.8 AND 505. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/25/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 27, 2010 T10CM02007 T10BU01146 O'Reilly Auto Parts Site and Grading Plan Review The flood control note indicates that the floodplain is shown on FEMA Panel 2282L. The correct panel is 2232K. The proposed L series maps have not yet become effective. The delineation shown on the proposed site plan doesn't reflect the March 24, 2000 letter of map revision (99-09-1301P.) Revise the delineation to be consistent with the most recent LOMR. The water surface contour at the upstream edge of the building should show reflect the WSE from the profile in the LOMR. Note that the profile elevations are NGVD 29 and the elevation certificate for the building, if required, will also be NGVD 29. Provide adequate freeboard for the lowest floor of the proposed retail store above the adjacent floodplain elevation. The lowest floor must be at least one foot higher than the WSE at the upstream edge. Clarify the proposed curb and access arrangement for this project. Indicate whether the existing curb at the southeast corner of the project is to remain or if it is to be removed. Clearly indicate how access through the alley will be controlled and show separation distance between the alley and the access point on Arcadia Avenue. Clearly show and dimension the sight visibility triangles for each driveway and for the corner of Arcadia Avenue and Speedway Boulevard. The SVTs must conform to the requirements of Development Standard (DS) 3-01.5. Show how the solid waste container enclosure will be accessed by the solid waste vehicle servicing the container. Provide a detail for the solid waste enclosure with dimensions to demonstrate a 10' by 10' clear area for the dumpster with bollards protecting the side and rear walls. |
| 10/27/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevation of the upstream manhole. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/28/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Provide vegetative cover for vehicle use area. 2. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify screening element on the landscape plan. 3. When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. Revise plans as necessary. 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. Note Celtis pallida is considered a shrub, an appropriate substitution would be Celtis reticulata 5. Provide future and existing Sight Visibility Triangles on the Site, Grading and Landscape plans. All landscaping and screening must comply with the sight visibility requirements of Development Standard 3-01.0. Plant materials located within sight visibility triangles should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty (30) inches. 6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 7. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/02/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/09/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |