Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM01943
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Tank plans say "Not for Construction". |
| 07/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2326.60) is higher than the first floor elevation (2323.25). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Coordinate the roof overflow drains (east and west) with the drain piping leading to the over flow outlet. 3. Clarify the connection of the rainwater leader to the site storm sewer; no storm sewer is shown on the civil drawings in that area. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. A cleanout is required at the base of a roof drain leader prior to its connection with a horizontal storm drain. Detail N1/P510 is ambiguous with regard to the location of the required cleanout. What is the height of the cleanout above the finished floor level? Reference: Sections 719.0, 1101.12.1, and 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. |
| 07/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Clarify the ductwork shown for the three return air grilles located at the north end of the store (M101); the ducts do not appear to be even close to connecting to them. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 07/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/05/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/05/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 08/06/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to identify what future 2" drain may be used for needs WW credit evaluation-5th floor needs capacity letter- Kurt Stemm- 740-6607-3rd floor need to provide plumbing schedule with counts and DWV sizes, include hexagon notes needs WW review of location/method of connection to public sewer-1st floor Roy M. group (PCRWRD) need to provide key for waste water fixtures needs IWC review/approval- Tom Tomchak-443-6200- 5025 W Ina Rd |
| 08/09/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM01943 QuikTrip # 1450 68 W River RD The electrical drawingd have been denied for the following: 1. The # 1 EG condudtor shown with the parallel 400 kcm conductors from Main Disconnect to Switchgear is incorrect(too small),due to these being supply side and ahead of overcurrent protection, 2. All XF Sheets showing Electrical Installations in Hazardous Locations to be sealed and signed bt EE per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements. |
| 08/10/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/31/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |