Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM01877
Parcel: 13631011Q

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T10CM01877
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/18/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Automatic fire sprinklers will be required due to fire access and distance to fire hydrant.
08/19/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied A. Insure Compliance with Inclusive Home Design Ordinance 10463 for all new dwelling units. Provide a new general note referencing to that effect.
THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING:
(Do not add these notes to drawing)
1. As per Section 1003.2, Provide at least one accessible entrance on an accessible route from public areas.
2. Reference Section 103.1, Wavier of Provisions in this Standard.
END OF REVIEW
08/23/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. All development within Regulated Areas must comply with all other applicable code provisions, including obtaining floodplain use permits where necessary. Washes zoned or named in the WASH regulations must also be reviewed in conformance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sections 23A- 50 and 51 DS 9-06.2.7

2. If encroachment is proposed into the Regulated Area(s), submittal of an Environmental Resource Report in conformance as defined in LUC 6.2.5 & DS 9-06.2.5.B.1 is required.

3. Include with re-submittal overlay case approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. Site plan review will continue once DSD Full Notice Procedure is complete.

4. This site is considered commercial development, Submittal of a landscape plan per LUC 3.7.2, DS 2-06 & 07 is necessary to verify that the site meets minimum requirements.

5. Submit an NPPO plan or provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C

6. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

7. Additional comments may apply.
08/23/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: River Valley Rance
T10CM01877
Site Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 23, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Provide a response letter with your next submittal.

2. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for a change of use.

3. This comment was not addressed. The provided site plan does not accurately depict the current site conditions. Revise the drawings to reflect what is to remain as is and any new additions. If existing buildings are proposed as to be permitted then show then as to be permitted. The discrepancies on the site plan are too numerous to list, contact the Zoning reviewer in regards to this comment.

4. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a legal description on the site plan.

5. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Pedestrian circulation is required per D.S. 2-08.3.0 but would not be required to be a concrete sidewalk. Pedestrian circulation needs to be designed to comply with handicap requirements of the IBC.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 The proposed lot coverage exceeds the allowed for the proposed use in an SR zone. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required to exceed the lot coverage.

7. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t10cm01877
08/24/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. All development within Regulated Areas must comply with all other applicable code provisions, including obtaining floodplain use permits where necessary. Washes zoned or named in the WASH regulations must also be reviewed in conformance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sections 23A- 50 and 51 DS 9-06.2.7

2. If encroachment is proposed into the Regulated Area(s), submittal of an Environmental Resource Report in conformance as defined in LUC 6.2.5 & DS 9-06.2.5.B.1 is required.

3. Include with re-submittal overlay case approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. Site plan review will continue once DSD Full Notice Procedure is complete.

4. This site is considered commercial development, Submittal of a landscape plan per LUC 3.7.2, DS 2-06 & 07 is necessary to verify that the site meets minimum requirements.

5. Submit an NPPO plan or provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C

6. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

7. Additional comments may apply.
09/09/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
09/14/2010 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied No WASH watercourses are on this site.
Once the riparian review process has been completed, the site plan will be approved.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/24/2010 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/24/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed