Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T10CM01877
Parcel: 13631011Q

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T10CM01877
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/09/2010 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Automatic fire sprinklers will be required due to fire access and distance to fire hydrant.
07/09/2010 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
07/13/2010 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: River Valley Rance
T10CM01877
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 19, 2010

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for a change of use.

2. The provided site plan does not accurately depict the current site conditions. Revise the drawings to reflect what is to remain as is and any new additions. If existing buildings are proposed as to be permitted then show then as to be permitted. The discrepancies on the site plan are too numerous to list, contact the Zoning reviewer in regards to this comment.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A the "SCALE 1" = 80'" does not appear to be correct.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 Provide a north arrow on the site plan.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a legal description on the site plan.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map on the site plan that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 All existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use. Provide overall dimensions for each building.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Dimension the distances between buildings on the site plan.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Based on the current aerial photos there is a vehicle parking area east and south of the stables, show on the plan and provide dimensions.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Pedestrian circulation is required per D.S. 2-08.3.0 but would not be required to be a concrete sidewalk. Pedestrian circulation needs to be designed to comply with handicap requirements of the IBC.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Provide the Millmar Road name on the site plan.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide a fully dimensioned right of way for Millmar Road.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show all existing and proposed site lighting layout and type.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Existing and proposed zoning of parcel and adjacent parcels, including those across streets.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Under "SITE INFORMATION, PRINCIPAL USES: AGRICULTURAL USE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION, COMMERCIAL STABLES" provide the development designator "2" and correct the subject to, to read: 3.5.2.1.A.2 and .B.2

17. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Provide the floor area for each building, existing and proposed, on the plan.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Until comments 2, 12 & 16 are addressed the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and Lot Coverage cannot be verified. Lot coverage includes: all buildings, all vehicular use areas whether improved or unimproved for parking of vehicles, hors trailers, etc, and all open storage areas for storage of materials, equipment, refuse, etc.

19. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan.

20. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t10cm01877

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan.
07/19/2010 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. All development within Regulated Areas must comply with all other applicable code provisions, including obtaining floodplain use permits where necessary. Washes zoned or named in the WASH regulations must also be reviewed in conformance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sections 23A- 50 and 51 DS 9-06.2.7

2. If encroachment is proposed into the Regulated Area(s), submittal of an Environmental Resource Report in conformance as defined in LUC 6.2.5 & DS 9-06.2.5.B.1 is required.

3. Include with re-submittal overlay case approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. Site plan review will continue once DSD Full Notice Procedure is complete.

4. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

5. Additional comments may apply
07/20/2010 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied 1. The provided site plan does not show the existing site improvements accurately. Please revise the site plan to show accurately and to scale all existing improvements to remain and all new improvements to be added. A meaningful accessibility review can not be conducted until a new accurate plan has been submitted.
2. The "SCALE 1" = 80' does not work. Please clarify scale.
3. Please provide a north arrow on the site plan.
4. Based on the current aerial photos there is a vehicle parking area east and south of the stables. Please show on the plan and including all accessible parking spaces required.
5. A pedestrian accessible route needs to be designed to comply with the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1104 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 402.
6. Please resubmit a revised site plan.
END OF REVIEW
07/21/2010 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. All development within Regulated Areas must comply with all other applicable code provisions, including obtaining floodplain use permits where necessary. Washes zoned or named in the WASH regulations must also be reviewed in conformance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sections 23A- 50 and 51 DS 9-06.2.7

2. If encroachment is proposed into the Regulated Area(s), submittal of an Environmental Resource Report in conformance as defined in LUC 6.2.5 & DS 9-06.2.5.B.1 is required.

3. Include with re-submittal overlay case approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. Site plan review will continue once DSD Full Notice Procedure is complete.

4. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

5. Additional comments may apply
07/30/2010 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied July 30, 2010
T10CM01877
Site Plan Review
Loren Makus, EIT


Provide sight visibility triangles for each driveway and for the intersection of South Pauline Lane and East Millmar Road.

Provide a location map and complete legal description.

Provide a basis of elevation for the contours, finish floors and water surface elevations. If basis of elevation for the 100-year WSEL is not in the same datum as the other elevations provide the appropriate conversion.

Provide complete right-of-way dimensions for both Millmar Road and Pauline Lane.

Add a note that all development within the 100-year floodplain requires floodplain use permits.

Show trash container storage locations and screening where required. If roll cans will be used, make a note on the plan and show approximate pickup location. If a large metal container is to be used, show its location, access and service area

Provide the finish floor elevation for all existing and proposed buildings. If any buildings have FFEs that are below the regulatory flood elevation, provide an explanation of how they meet the venting and restricted storage requirements of the floodplain ordinance. For the existing stables it is sufficient to indicate that they are in compliance with the floodplain use permit obtained for their construction. Include the FUP number on the plan.
08/03/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the location and size of the water meter (if one exists or is planned)
b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants
c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned)
d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer
e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer (if one exists or is planned)
f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes (if a connection to the sewer is planned)
g. the first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.1.0 2 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/04/2010 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/04/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed