Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T10CM01810
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/16/2010 | EGRANT1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Approved on the OK to SUBMIT folder 7/1/10. Folder added by mistake. BGrant |
| 08/17/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/17/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | STRUCTURAL COMMENTS SECOND REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16; GENERAL: ALL DRAWINGS MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, INCLUDING LICENSE RENEWAL DATE. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD DID NOT DATE HIS SEAL. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 38; SHEET S-2.11A (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 289): THE FOOTINGS AT GRIDS R1 AND B AND GRIDS R7 AND E ARE DENOTED AS F1 (6'-0" SQ.) ON THE PLAN, BUT AS F3 (8'-0" SQ.) IN THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 47; GENERAL: COMPLETE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 48; GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. 5. SHEET S-1.31; DETAIL 9: GIVE A REFERENCE ON THIS DETAIL AS TO WHERE IT IS LOCATED ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEET S-1.41; DETAIL 5: GIVE A REFERENCE ON THIS DETAIL AS TO WHERE IT IS LOCATED ON THE PLAN. |
| 08/18/2010 | RONALD BROWN | HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/26/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/27/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2395.59') from the building sewer that exits the building between columns 6 and 7 is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2396.00'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Note that this code section also requires that fixtures on floor levels above the first floor elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve. (See also Section 904.1, UPC 2006 with respect to venting requirements.) It is not clear from the drawing if the building sewer that exits the building between columns 1.5 and 1.9 also needs a backwater valve; determine the rim elevation of the manhole upstream from that sewer connection. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide calculations to show that the 3rd level scupper (detail 18/A-6.3) is hydraulically equivalent to the minimum scupper requirements noted in Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 08/27/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for SFC-1. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
| 08/27/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to provide approved DP with piont and location of connection need capacity evaluation-Kurt Stemm- 3rd floor PWB- 740-6607 we will recount all waste water fixtures on resubmittal, including specified stub outs for future use. need to indicate use of drains for future sue are also floor drains in garage parking area need to be directed to daylight need to indicate elevator pump and point of termination for drain to vegetated area |
| 08/27/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Tucson Water requires the water meters to be located at the property line. Provide a letter from Tucson Water indicating that the proposed location is acceptable to them. |
| 08/27/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project : T10CM01810 345 E Congress ST New Parking Garage The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following : Items from last review (7-31-10) have not been reviewed or changed------- 1. No 2006 IECC Lighting Budget Calculations, Com check will be ok. 2. Provide a calculation showing compliance with 2006 City of Tucson Outdoor Light Ord # 10035. 3. Provide the feeder size and conduit size for the conductors from the utility transformer to the new 1600 amp SwitchBoard. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, City of Tuc, 8/29/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/27/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Plaza Centro T10CM01810 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 19, 2010 1. The foundation plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the foundation plan was in compliance with the approved Development Package. 3. Zoning will re-review the foundation plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm01810.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/13/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |