Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM01808
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/07/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a floor drain in the restroom. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 2. Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 3. Clarify the nature of the "point of use water cooler provided by the owner"; the architect appears to show a single electric water fountain on sheet A3. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. One of the specified fixtures (Bradley emergency eyewash) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 25-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Note also that the demand used to determine the pressure drop through the water meter, RP, and the water service pipe should include the demand attributable to the existing plumbing fixtures and to the HVAC requirements. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 610.1, UPC 2006 and ANSI Standard Z358.1. 5. A note on detail 2/P4 calls for a wall cleanout to be located 24" AFF behind the water closet, P1. Since the tank for P1 extends to 29.25" AFF, how will access be provided for the cleanout? Reference: Section 707.10, UPC 2006. |
| 07/07/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide a copy of the approved drawings for the shell package of the building to establish the existing conditions of the tenant space. Reference: Sections 106.1 and 106.3, IBC 2006. 3. Clarify the purpose of EF-1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 4. Show how EF-1 is mounted on the roof, how maintenance access is being provided, and the location of the exhaust discharge. Provide guards for equipment located within 10 feet of a roof edge or of a walking surface that is elevated more than 30 inches above the adjoining grade. Reference: Section 304.10, IMC 2006. |
| 07/07/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/08/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide structural calculations for the dock and ramp areas. 2. Please provide structural details and calculations for the mounting of the new FC-1. 3. Please provide a structural framing plan for the plywood roof over the new toilet area. a. If this new deck is intended for storage, please provide signage stating maxium design storage load. If not for storage, please provide "NO STORAGE" signage. 4. Please provide the Occupany Load calculations on the drawings, code analysis of exits required and provide plumbing fixture analysis. 5. Please provide a summary letter to Mr. LeeRay Hanly listing all deferred submittals for additional fee accessment. 6. There is an expired permit T07CM01498 that needs to be reopened and finalized. 7. The point of use water cooler needs to be shown on the plumbing drawings attached to a water service line. Please note "Point of Use" to the water dispenser shown on the architectural floor plan. 8. Please provide completed Special Inspection Certificates as outlined on sheet S-1 for review and approval. 9. Generic accessibility details are not acceptable. Please provide large scale interior toilet elevations. Please show all critical accessible code requirements on these elevations and on the floor plan. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/08/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | Reference Building comments |
| 07/09/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM01808, 2595 E Fairview Av TI Office,Warehouse,Maint., Building 12,000 Sq Ft Electrical plans denied for following: 1. Total loads shown on Panel A1 listed are incorrectly added, Phase A= 40691va /120v=341 amps Phase B= 41839va/ 120v=348 amps Phase C= 44709va/120v= 375 amps along with the loads for Panel A, they exceed the 380 amp load of the 500mcm feeders? Ray T Majuta,PDSD, City of Tuc, Elect Pln Ck, 7/8/10 Ray.Majuta@tucson.gov |
| 07/13/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/13/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/16/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/16/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |