Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T10CM01772
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/30/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide storm water drain cleanouts at intervals no greater than 100 feet for straight runs and for aggregate horizontal changes of direction of 135 degrees or greater. Reference: Sections 719.1 and 1101.12.1, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain leader prior to its connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. |
07/07/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | Building plans will be reviewed and approved after the development plan has been approved. |
07/09/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/09/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/09/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
07/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET AB2 (SPREAD FOOTING OPTION); GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION (PAGE viii): THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DOES NOT OFFER THE SPREAD FOOTING OPTION FOR THE CANOPY AS SHOWN ON THE DETAILS. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET AB2 (SPREAD FOOTING OPTION); GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION (PAGE 10); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 13): IF THE SPREAD FOOTING OPTION WAS ALLOWED, THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS 2500 PSF, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 3000 PSF WAS USED IN THE DESIGN. 3. SHEET AB2; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (BASE PLATE DESIGN): THE BASE PLATE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS (1 1/4"X22"X1'-10") DOES NOT MATCH THE STANDARD BASE PLATE DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS (1 1/4"X18"X1'-6"). CLARIFY. 4. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: DID NOT LOCATE THE ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN AT THE COLUMNS. VERIFY. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
07/14/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
07/14/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |