Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T10CM01772
Parcel: 13612001N

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG

Permit Number - T10CM01772
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/30/2010 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/06/2010 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide storm water drain cleanouts at intervals no greater than 100 feet for straight runs and for aggregate horizontal changes of direction of 135 degrees or greater. Reference: Sections 719.1 and 1101.12.1, UPC 2006.
2. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain leader prior to its connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006.
07/07/2010 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review Building plans will be reviewed and approved after the development plan has been approved.
07/09/2010 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
07/09/2010 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 07/09/2010

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
07/13/2010 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET AB2 (SPREAD FOOTING OPTION); GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION (PAGE viii): THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DOES NOT OFFER THE SPREAD FOOTING OPTION FOR THE CANOPY AS SHOWN ON THE DETAILS. CLARIFY.
2. SHEET AB2 (SPREAD FOOTING OPTION); GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION (PAGE 10); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 13): IF THE SPREAD FOOTING OPTION WAS ALLOWED, THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS 2500 PSF, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 3000 PSF WAS USED IN THE DESIGN.
3. SHEET AB2; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (BASE PLATE DESIGN): THE BASE PLATE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS (1 1/4"X22"X1'-10") DOES NOT MATCH THE STANDARD BASE PLATE DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS (1 1/4"X18"X1'-6"). CLARIFY.
4. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: DID NOT LOCATE THE ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN AT THE COLUMNS. VERIFY.
5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/14/2010 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/14/2010 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed