Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM01771
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Replot sheets P201 and P502 so that details A1/P201, A11/P201, and A1/P502 are legible. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a vacuum relief for the storage-type water heater (located above fixture outlets). Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Clarify how the air breaks shown for the cubed ice and the crushed ice conform to the requirements of Section 801.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 07/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Clarify the ductwork shown for the three return air grilles located at the north end of the store (M101); the ducts do not appear to be even close to connecting to them. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Coordinate the schedule of diffusers and registers (M601) with the duct layout on sheet M101. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 07/06/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/07/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plans will be reviewed and approved after the development plan has been approved. |
| 07/09/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/09/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/09/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a written deferred submittal summary list in letter for to Mr. LeeRay Hanly for additional fee accessment. 2. Please complete your occupancy load calculations on Sheet N101. 3. On Sheet A211, generic accessibility details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessibility code requirements on the actual floor plan and elevations. 4. Delete all reference to "ADA". Change reference to accessibility code requirements to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition). Change all notes and design details ot meet these standards. SHEET N102 5. Delete all reference to "ADA". Change reference to accessibility code requirements to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition). Change all notes and design details to meet these standards. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS T10CM01771 QUIK TRIP 6. SHEET S101; PLAN: A SECTION IS CUT AT A CONTROL JOINT TO THE LEFT OF GRID LINE 1 AND IS DENOTED AS F13/S1.1. THERE IS NO SHEET S1.1. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S130 (PLAN); SHEET S510 (SECTION H8): SECTION H8 INDICATES A MASONRY WALL SUPPORTING THE CANTILEVERED ROOF JOIST, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A STEEL BEAM. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S130; PLAN: A SECTION IS CUT AT RTU-2 AND IS DENOTED AS A13/S4.1. THERE IS NO SHEET S4.1. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S502: SECTIONS P1/P1A, P12/P12A, AND P16: THE SECTIONS DO NOT INDICATE FINISH GRADE. PROVIDE THAT TO ENSURE THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET (MINIMUM FOUNDATION DEPTH OF 1'-6" BELOW FINISH GRADE). 10. SHEET S502; SECTION E12: WHAT DOES THE 2'-0" DIMENSION INDICATE? CLARIFY. 11. SHEET S510; SECTION O8: THIS SECTION SHOULD BE CUT ON SHEET S130 IN PLACE OF SECTION H8. VERIFY. 12. SHEET S510; SECTION O12: THE SECTION CUT DENOTED AS O8/S510 SHOULD BE H8/S510. VERIFY. 13. SHEET S520; SECTION P12: THE SECTION CUT DENOTED AS A16/S520 SHOULD BE P16/S520. VERIFY. 14. SHEET S520; SECTION E4: A DIMENSION LINE REFERENCES A-16-A6.1. REVISE. 15. SHEET S601; FOUNDATION NOTE 1: THIS NOTE SHOULD BE CHANGED TO INDICATE THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION THAT WAS USED ON THIS JOB. 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/13/2010 | RONALD BROWN | HC | REVIEW | Denied | Reference Building Comments |
| 07/14/2010 | SREEVES1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/14/2010 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/14/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |