Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM01664
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Floodplain Use Permit Required. 7/13/10 Per conversation with JV and JG floodplain use permit will still be required since proposed development is located within a FEMA ZONE X (100-YR) and is regulated by CIty of Tucon Ordinance. Service Writer's Booth will be concidered accessory structure and will require openings and elevation or floodproofing of all electrical components servicing the structure. Bianca Ramirez |
| 06/29/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Povide an accessible route to the new Service Advisors offices. 2. The new interior ramp must be 3' wide clear between the handrails as required by ICC (ANSI 117.1), section 405.5. 3. For toilet accessibility compliance, generic details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessible dimensions and requirements on the large scale floor plan and elevations. 4. The lavoratory does do appear to meet code clearance requirements as per Section 606. Please provide a large scale section throught the lav showing compliance clearances. 5. Please provide a large scale detail plan of the drinking fountains showing compliance with Section 602 clearances. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/29/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a deferred submittal letter and send to LeeRay Hanly for additional fee accessment. 2. As per Note 11, Sheet A1.0, please provide cashier desk details. 3. Please provide structural details and calculations for the following: a. Water heater wall hanging support b. All roof top mounted HVAC equipment 4. Specification sheet 14 calls for a 4' square footing and the footing schedule on sheet S-1.2 for the same footing (F9) calls for a 3'-8" square footing. Please clarify. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 3. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities and combined outdoor air rates are used. Provide the description of the occupancy types used to determine the ventilation requirements. If the rooftop units also serve areas that are not part of the current activity, include those additional areas in the calculations used to determine the total amount of outside air to be delivered by the rooftop unit. |
| 06/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 2. Determine the size of the gas line between the existing gas meter and the new gas piping; this is a design issue. Reference: Sections 103.2.2, 103.2.3, and 1209.4, UPC 2006. 3. Provide calculations to show that the size of the overflow in the roof drain collector box has a drainage capacity equal to that of the scupper. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 06/30/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/14/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED 5TH FLOOR WW CREDIT EVALUATION-740-6544 |
| 07/19/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/20/2010 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/20/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/21/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |