Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM01599
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All deferred submittals (Metal building) require a summary letter sent to Mr. LeeRay Hanly for aqpproval and additional fee accessment. 2. Provide completed Special Inspection Certificates. a. There are several more inspections required other than what was summarized on Sheet S-0. Please review the listing provided and provide approval and/or comments. 3. Please show slope of roof on plans. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/21/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 06/22/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The building plans will be reviewed after the development plan has been approved. |
| 06/24/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the referenced civil drawings that show the water service to the proposed buildings. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 and Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf |
| 06/25/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide information regarding the type of operations to be conducted in the blast room, the materials to be used, and the expected material concentrations. Reference: Sections 510, 511.1.1, and 511.2, IMC 2006. 2. Installation of the paint booth will require a separate permit. |
| 06/25/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide sizing information for the roof gutters and downspouts. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006. |
| 06/29/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project:930 W Glenn St, T10CM01599 Paint and Blast Building In order to review electrical plans efficiently,please provide the the following information: 1. Provide a summary of the operation of the business including the following, A. The types of items to be blasted and painted, B. The type of materials to be used in the operation such as paint etc, C. How will the materials be stored, and how will they be mixed (paint). D. Are the materials considered flamable ? E. Is the Paint Booth listed or labeled, or approved by any Testing Facility ? Provide information on this. F. Provide shaded areas considered Hazardous, either as Class 1 or Class 11, Division 1 or 2 per 2005 NEC 516, even though they may not have any electrical wiring or equipment. Since booh permits for the Office - Shop, and Paint Building are on the same set of plans, items above to be provided for review prior to issuing either of the permits. RT Majuta, Elect Pln Ck, PDSD, City of Tucson, 6/29/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/09/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/09/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/09/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/19/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |