Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM01598
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/18/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide an occupancy load analysis using a mixed occupancy use of "B" and "F-1". 2. Shouldn't there be a second finished floor design elevation shown on the drawings other than on the stair plan for riser heights? a. What is the 11'-8" dimension shown on the East Elevation, sheet A-1. Please clarify that this is the second floor level. 3. Please clarify the second floor elevation in the structural drawings. 4. All deferred submittals (Metal building and 10 ton hoist) require a summary letter sent to Mr. LeeRay Hanly for aqpproval and additional fee accessment. 5. Provide completed Special Inspection Certificates. a. There are several more inspections required other than what was summarized on Sheet S-0. Please review the listing provided and provide approval and/or comments. 6. Please provide structural calculations for the two fan coil unit support. 7. Please show slope of roof on plans. 8. Is the 10 ton crain to be supplied with the manufactured building? Please clarify responsibility of the crain on the documents. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 06/22/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The building permit will be reviewed after the development plan has been approved. |
| 06/24/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the referenced civil drawings that show the water service to the proposed buildings. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 and Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf |
| 06/25/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems (walls, doors, and roof) and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Show how the fan coils and the unit heaters are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. The "warehouse" in this building does not appear to be used solely for the purpose of storing materials and it has been identified by the architect as F-1 occupancy (factory, moderate hazard). Such areas are not within the scope of Table 403.3, IMC 2006 or ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004. Provide an engineering analysis of the space to determine the minimum required ventilation rate so that worker exposure levels are within applicable OSHA PEL and ACGIH TLV limits. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006. |
| 06/25/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Clarify the reason for installing a double check valve assembly at the building water service entrance. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Provide sizing information for the roof gutters and downspouts. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006. |
| 06/29/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | See comments for Permit T10CM01598, Ray T Majuta |
| 07/09/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/09/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/09/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/19/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |