Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM01512
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The minimum font size for construction documents is 3/32", both upper and lower case. Most all sheets contained within this set of documents have lettering smaller than 3/32". Please comply with minimum font size for all sheets and resubmit. 2. Please delete all reference to ADA and replace with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition) for all accessible standards. 3. Please provide accessible seating the interior dining as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1108.2.8 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 902. Disperse seating through out the facility. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/11/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | Reference Commerial-Building for comments |
| 06/15/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/17/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled to a maximum of 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 2. The water heater detail (P2) calls for draining the pressure relief valves to a hub drain. Provide information to show that the hub drain complies with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006. 3. Provide an indirect waste connection for the sanitizing compartment of the 3-compartment sink. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Provide justification for not connecting the floor sink that is accepting the waste from the 2-compartment sink to the grease waste system. Reference: Section 306.1, UPC 2006. 5. Clarify the gas piping design. The gas load summary on P2 indicates five fryers at 140 MBH each being installed but the gas riser diagram on P3 only shows two connections of 280 MBH each. Reference: Section 1217.0, UPC 2006. |
| 06/21/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | May 27, 2010 FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT # T10OT01205 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2106 W Grant Road APPLICANT'S NAME: Jon McDonald PROPERTY OWNER: Massapequa Associates LLC This parcel lies in a City of Tucson identified 100-year floodplain. The applicant is authorized to use a portion of the flood hazard area in the City of Tucson, Arizona, on the property described as: PARCEL 103-21-342A; 2106 W Grant Road, Tucson, AZ 85745, GRANT ROAD-SILVERBELL SHOPPING CENTER S448.2' LOT 4. In a portion of Township 13 South, Range 13 East, Section 33, for TI: Wingstop to an existing non conforming structure. The applicant agrees to comply with City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations, and are bound by the conditions stated below. Violation of any of the conditions stated or referred to below, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be grounds for revocation of this permit. Responsibility for renewal of this permit, if necessary, is with the applicant. Issuance of this permit does not constitute a waiver of other requirements contained in the Tucson City Code, Land Use Code, or any other Federal, State, or local regulation. No use other than as permitted herein is allowed. Additional uses allowed under City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Regulations require application for, review and approval of an additional Floodplain Use Permit. This floodplain use permit is issued with the following conditions: 1) If improvements equal or exceed 50% of the current value of the structure; no other improvements will be permitted unless the entire structure is brought into compliance with the City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations (Chapter 26, Tucson Code). If the project is determined to be a substantial improvement, and, if it is determined that the lowest flood elevation is below the regulatory floor elevation, a design submittal, and review and acceptance of the submittal for floodproofing will be required and shall conform to current City of Tucson and FEMA floodplain development requirements in effect on the date of authorization by the Development Services Department. 2) The proposed improvements shall not impose conditions that would increase the flood damage potential to the combined proposed and existing building, by 50 percent or greater of the existing structure's value. 3) Per City of Tucson Planning and Building Development Services - Structural Department the valuation provided an estimate of ($180,000.00) was provided showing that the improvements are less than 50 % (estimate was 35%) of the assessed value of the structure per the Pima County Assessor Property Inquiry (2010) of the 2010 valuation excluding land value - $509,390.00). No person shall repair or alter property in a piecemeal manner so as to avoid the provisions of Section 26-4.1.a.3, Chapter 26-Tucson Code. The estimate will be recorded and any future improvements will be added to it. 4) This project is located within a City of Tucson (100-year) floodplain. 5) Except as approved by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction, development under this permit shall not obstruct, retard or divert the existing flow of floodwaters from or to adjacent properties. 6) This Floodplain Use Permit is issues concurrently with the improvement plans/permit. Copies of these documents shall be kept in a readily accessible location on site at all times. 7) Any future permanent, freestanding walls or other structures shall have separate floodplain use permit applications submitted to this office for review and approval. 8) An application/processing fee of $50.00 (submittal fee) must accompany each future request for work to be authorized under this floodplain use permit. Engineering study review fees of $150.00 may be imposed based upon the fee schedule in the current floodplain ordinance. 9) The associated improvements are with permit activity number T10CM01512. 10) The applicant attests to the fact that the plans and documents submitted represent all of the improvements that will be done to the existing building, and that all addition, improvements or repairs to the building are included in the construction plans and/or documents herewith. No other improvements, repairs, reconstruction, additions or remodeling have been made to the structure that is not indicated in the attached plans and/or documents. 11) Renewal of this permit will require a new application, review and approval of that application by the City of Tucson, Development Services Department Engineering Division. This permit may be renewed for up to one year, in the absence of Registered Plant authorization, at the sole discretion of the City Engineer or designated representatives. 12) This permit is specific to the improvements for 2106 W Grant Road, as indicated on the approved plans. It shall not apply to any other structure or property, whether attached or unattached, not specified under this permit. This Floodplain Use Permit will be automatically revoked and becomes invalid if conditions are not complied with, as set forth in this permit. APPLICANT NAME: Jon McDonald ADDRESS: 1101 E Arapho, Richardson, TX 75081 PHONE: (520) 743-1337 OWNER: Massapequa Associates LLC ADDRESS: 6326 E Paseo San Andres, Tucson, AZ 85710 PHONE: (EXPIRATION DATE) Month: 6 Day: 21 Year: 2011 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE The applicant is authorized by the City Engineer to receive a floodplain use permit subject to the above referenced conditions and restrictions. |
| 06/22/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Provide legible structural calculations (sheet M5).Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Provide structural calculations to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 4. Clarify the type of grease duct to be installed; per the mechanical specifications and detail 7/M3 or the manufactured single-walled grease duct shown on sheet H2. Provide the listing information for the proposed single-wall grease duct. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 506.3.1.1, IMC 2006. 5. Grease duct clearances to combustibles shall be per Section 506.3.6, IMC 2006 or as per listing of manufactured grease ducts. 6. Verify the construction of the wall behind the Type I grease hood and show that the clearances required by Section 507.9, IMC 2006 are being maintained. 7. The section view of the hood on sheet H1 indicates a backsplash that is the same length as the proposed hood. Verify that a non-combustible, nonabsorbent, and cleanable material will extend at least 18" beyond the hood if the clearances are being reduced per Section 507.9, IMC 2006. |
| 06/25/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: T10CM01512, Wingstop Restaurant 2106 W Grant Rd The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following: As required per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal requirements, 1. Show location of service. 2. Provide total Tennant and building load. 3. Provide fault current analysis at service to panel. 4. If a new meter is to be installed, show size of conductors from gutter to meter. Ray T Majuta, Elect Pln Ck, PDSD, City of Tucson, 6/26/10, Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov PDSD, Elec |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/16/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |