Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T10CM01509
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEETS S001, S002, AND S003; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: REMOVE NOTES THAT DO NOT SPECIFICALLY PERTAIN TO THIS PROJECT. 2. SHEET S001; REINFORCING STEEL: NOTE 3 INDICATES THE REINFORCING STEEL IS TO BE DETAILED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF ACI 318 AND CRSI. DETAIL DRAWINGS ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, THEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO THE FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION. VERIFY. 3. SHEET S004; DETAIL 13: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE AT THE JOINT. 4. SHEET S005; DETAIL 033: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE PT TENDON DETAIL. WILL THIS SHEET BE ADDED LATER? 5. SHEET S005; DETAIL 029: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE IN NOTE 1. 6. SHEET S005; DETAIL 035: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE SLAB DEPRESSION DETAIL. WILL THIS SHEET BE ADDED LATER? 7. SHEET S005; DETAIL 027: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE REINFORCING SCHEDULE DETAIL. 8. SHEET S005; DETAIL 036: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE POUR STRIP DETAIL AND THE PT BOXED NOTE. 9. SHEET S201AB; PLAN: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE ON GRID A CONCERNING OPENINGS AND A PILASTER DETAIL. 10. SHEETS S201AB/AT; PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS B AND C AND GRIDS 6 AND 7, THERE IS A SWALE DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS INCOMPLETE. IF THIS DETAIL IS PERTINENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOUNDATION, PLEASE IDENTIFY. 11. SHEETS S201BB/BT; PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS H AND I AND GRIDS 14 AND 15, THERE IS A SWALE DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS INCOMPLETE. IF THIS DETAIL IS PERTINENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOUNDATION, PLEASE IDENTIFY. 12. SHEETS S201BB/BT; PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS E AND F AND GRIDS 11 AND 12, THERE IS AN INCOMPLETE SECTION CUT. REVISE. 13. SHEETS S201BB/BT; PLAN: COMPLETE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 4. 14. SHEET S201BB; PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS H AND I AND SOUTH OF GRID 16, THERE IS AN INCOMPLETE DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE RAMP SLAB. REVISE. 15. SHEET S302 (ELEVATION); SHEET S310 (SECTION 301): THE SECTION CUT 301 IS SHOWN ON SHEET S302 ABOVE LEVEL 02, BUT SECTION 301 ON SHEET S310 INDICATES IT SHOULD BE BELOW LEVEL 02. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET S302 (ELEVATION); SHEET S310 (SECTIONS 302/304/305): THE SECTION CUTS ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE ELEVATION. CLARIFY. 17. SHEET S303 (ELEVATION); SHEET S312 (SECTIONS 311/313/314): THE SECTION CUTS ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE ELEVATION. CLARIFY. 18. SHEET S303 (ELEVATION); SHEET S310 (SECTION 303): IS THE SECTION CUT 303 CORRECT ON THIS ELEVATION? VERIFY. 19. SHEET S303 (ELEVATION): THERE IS AN UNREFERENCED SECTION CUT ON GRID C. CLARIFY. 20. SHEET S304 (ELEVATION); SHEET S310 (ALL SECTIONS): VERIFY THE SECTION CUTS ON SHEET S310 ARE RELEVANT TO SHEAR WALL SWC (USED ON SW8). 21. SHEET S305 (ELEVATION); SHEET S312 (SECTIONS 310 AND 311): THE SECTION CUT 311 IS SHOWN ON SHEET S305 BELOW LEVEL 02, BUT SECTION 311 ON SHEET S312 INDICATES IT SHOULD BE ABOVE LEVEL 02. CLARIFY. 22. GENERAL: SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED FOR SITE PREPARATION, FOUNDATION AND EXCAVATION, AND CAISSONS. 23. GENERAL: SOME REVIEW COMMENTS ARE RELEVANT ONLY OUTSIDE THIS "FOUNDATION ONLY" REVIEW. THESE MAY BE ADDRESSED DURING SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS. MAKE THAT STATEMENT IN YOUR WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR THIS REVIEW. 24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/03/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2010 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 06/09/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/09/2010, The subject submittal is conditionally approved subject to approval by all reviewers. Engineering needs to see the approved plans for Engineering stamp. |
| 06/09/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: UNISOURCE ENERGY CORP T10CM01509 Foundation Only Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 9, 2010 1. The foundation plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the foundation plan was in compliance with the approved Development Package. 3. Zoning will re-review the foundation plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Development Package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm01509.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 06/15/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a design for the subsoil drainage system. Reference: Section 1807, IBC 2006 and Section 1111.1, IPC 2006. 2. Clarify the destination of the rainwater sump pump discharge and verify that the discharge of the elevator sump pumps may terminate in the same location. |
| 06/16/2010 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/29/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |