Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T10CM01452
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/01/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/01/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
06/11/2010 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/11/2010 | RMYERS1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/16/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G1.0; BUILDING CODES: THIS TENANT IMPROVEMENT IS FOR THE R-2 PORTION ONLY. PROVIDE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS PROJECT ON SHEET G1.0. 2. SHEET A1.0; BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN: REVISE OR REMOVE NOTE 11 AT THE STAIR. 3. SHEET A1.0 (MEZZANINE PLAN); SHEET A3.0 (DETAIL 5): THE MEZZANINE PLAN INDICATES THE NEW WATER HEATER IS SUPPORTED AT THE MEZZANINE FLOOR, AND DETAIL 5 INDICATES IT IS SUPPORTED BELOW THE FLOOR (AS DOES DETAIL 1/P1.0). IS THERE ADEQUATE ROOM BELOW THE MEZZANINE FLOOR TO SUPPORT THE WATER HEATER? CLARIFY. 4. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 2): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE NEW WATER HEATER IS SUPPORTED BY THE EXISTING MEZZANINE FLOOR FRAMING. IS IT HANGING BELOW THE FLOOR PER DETAILS 5/A3.0 AND 1/P1.0, OR IS IT ON TOP OF THE FLOOR? CLARIFY. 5. GENERAL: IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO RECEIVE A LETTER OF COMPLETION FOR THIS PROJECT. WHEN CONSTRUCTION ON THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED, AND THE LETTER OF COMPLETION IS ISSUED, THE ENTIRE JULIAN DREW STUDIO (R-2 AND B OCCUPANCIES COMBINED) SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
06/16/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/17/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how the fan coil is being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 2. Verify that the condensate drain terminates in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
06/21/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need 5th floor credit evaluation need to show location/method of connection to public sewer need 3rd floor PCRWRD review of easement/jt use agreements, etc- Chad Amateau- 740-6547 |
06/25/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
06/25/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
06/25/2010 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |