Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T10CM01447
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/27/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030. 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. 5.Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements. 6. Need stamp on plans no stickers. |
| 05/27/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | No TI's until WWM fees are paid No wastewater plumbing stub-outs need PCRWRD field engineering review & approval DSC/1st floor - 740-6369- 6" private sewer to 8" public sewer in vacinity of 30" public sewer- may need to connect to a manhole, either new or exsisting. |
| 06/07/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Architect's seal is non compliant. a. A "Stick On Seal" is not acceptable. Reference ASBTR requirements attached. b. Registrant registration expiration date is missing 2. Please provide a summary letter for all deferred submittals in care of Mr. LeeRay Hanly. 3. Please provide a wall section through the two hour rated wall adjacent to the existing Fry's store and specify Ul assembly number. 4. Several sheets have fonts smaller than the reuired minimum size of 3/32" both upper and lower case. 5. Please provide roof top mounted HVAC details and structural calculations. 6. Please provide two sets of structural calculations. There is one one set available in the submittal package. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/07/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/09/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Scott Jackson DATE: June 10, 2010 4527 N. 16th St., Ste. 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Subject: Fry's Shops, 4036 N. 1st Ave Building Plan T10CM01447 (First Review) T19S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Building Plan. The Building Plan (BP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Building Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the bldg plans. 2. The reference site plan and site details in the BP set shall match the approved Development Plan and its details. However the Development Plan (D09-040) submitted for this project has not been reviewed and judging from the reference site plan in the BP it will need many corrections. Replace the reference site plan with the approved Development Plan before the next submittal or when the DP has been approved. 3. Show BP activity number (T10CM01447) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 4. Sidewalk scuppers are required when necessary, however explain where the "Roof Drain Thru Curb" detail, 11/AO.60 is used. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/4036 N. 1st Ave Bldg |
| 06/16/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. 2. Permission to use a single gravity grease interceptor to serve multiple business establishments requires an appeal to the building official. Reference: sections 301.2 and 1014.3.4.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. The 2-way cleanout shown in Detail 3/P2.1 is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 2006. 5. Verify the size of the roof drain/overflow drain located at column D-1. 6. Coordinate the size of the downspouts located along the east side of the new shell building; they are called out as 6" round on sheet P1.1 and 4"x 6" on sheet P1.1. 7. Clarify the installation of the scuppers on the east side of the new shell building; is the height of the secondary scupper higher than the primary scupper and if so, by how much? 8. Clarify the installation of the overflow roof drains. The overflow roof drain is specified as having a 2" dam but the plans (Detail 3/P2.1 and P1.1) also show the overflow roof drain being installed 2" higher than the roof drain, resulting in a 4" water depth before draining water through the overflow. Reference: Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.2, UPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. 9. Clarify the "LEAVING INVERT…" note located near column A4; to what does it pertain? |
| 06/16/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/16/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the water service to the shell addition. Keynote #2/P1.1 states that a new 2" water meter will be used to supply the water but keynote #31/DP03 calls out a new 1-1/2" water meter and the water calculations on sheet P2.1 also call out a new 1-1/2" water meter. |
| 06/21/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT: T10CM01447, 4036 N1ST AV Electrical plans denied for the following: 1. Provide individual unit numbers for each space per Pima County Addressing, 2. All plans to be min 3/32" upper and lower case per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements, some electrical in smaller than 3/32". Ray T Majuta PDSD, City of Tucson, Elect Pln Ck 7/20/10 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/21/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/21/2010 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/09/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |