Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T10CM01432
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1.1; PLAN NOTES: PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3/32" HIGH LETTERING PER CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS. 2. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: REVISE THE LEVEL OF WALL SHADING SO INFORMATION ON THE PLAN IS NOT HIDDEN. 3. SHEET S3.1; PLAN NOTES AND WALL SCHEDULE: PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3/32" HIGH LETTERING PER CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS. 4. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (B17 ON SHEET 8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B17 TO BE 2-2X8, WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES 2-2X6. CLARIFY. 5. SHEETS S3.1 AND S3.2 (PLAN NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 9): THE TABLE IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES ALL WALL STUDS TO BE 2X6 AT 16" O.C., WHILE THE PLAN NOTES INDICATE 2X4 AT 16" O.C. OR 24" O.C. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET S4.1; DETAILS 2 AND 3: REVISE THE LEVEL OF WALL SHADING SO INFORMATION IS NOT HIDDEN. 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2010 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/26/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |